|
1) Yes you ignore any damage beyond what's in your hand. It may seem like you're getting off easy, but remember -- you lost your hand, you have little to nothing to contribute till you get that back.
2) Deck is just the pile you draw from. Deck, discard, and hand are three very distinct groups of cards.
3) You can choose not play a card on a combat check, and instead use Strength or Melee. The amulet is best for Sajan, because he uses his Dex instead when he doesn't use a card to define his check, and can add 1d4 to that.
I took enough damage to reduce my hand to zero and on the next players turn a monster was summoned for each player to fight. I lost that fight as well so I took some damage. I had no cards in my hand, all are in either my deck or discard pile.
If you mean you took the first damage on your turn, then by the next player's turn you should have had a full hand of cards to lose again, since you reset your hand at the end of your turn (if it was a different player's turn both times then what you've said would be right).
Taking damage on another player's turns is particularly bad since you start your own turn with no cards left (and don't draw back until the end of the turn). Of course you can explore with no cards in hand but you're taking a bit of a risk, many cards penalise you for failing in other ways.
Even better than one lot of damage protecting you from more damage is finding other ways to get rid of cards out of your hand in preparation for taking a lot of damage. This is where only being able to play cards relevant to a check is important though, once you've seen a monster you can't beat it's already too late to cast a cure in your hand for instance.
3) You can choose not play a card on a combat check, and instead use Strength or Melee. The amulet is best for Sajan, because he uses his Dex instead when he doesn't use a card to define his check, and can add 1d4 to that.
I think Balazar/Padrig would like this too.
3) You can choose not play a card on a combat check, and instead use Strength or Melee. The amulet is best for Sajan, because he uses his Dex instead when he doesn't use a card to define his check, and can add 1d4 to that.I think Balazar/Padrig would like this too.
Indeed. Lini is often mentioned as benefiting from the Amulet as well. I think WotR Kyra's Demon/Undead defeating power would also benefit.
1) Yes you ignore any damage beyond what's in your hand. It may seem like you're getting off easy, but remember -- you lost your hand, you have little to nothing to contribute till you get that back.
But you're INVINCIBLE! Just remember that your friends aren't, and aren't going to be happy when you run into a bane that deals damage to everyone.
