
Monkeykibble |
GM is allowing some of us in the party to change to another class/make modifications. I did have a fighter, but might change to a class thats useful in and out of combat.
I was considering Skald, Summoner or Bard. I know Summoner may take extra work (Summon Monster Stats/etc) but I'd be willing to put the effort in.
I have a knack for being a wordsmith, and the GM wanted me to have the option to play it out in-game.
My concern was being able to have the "WOW I'm a bad-ass!" in-combat moments that I did with the fighter, but not be useless out of combat either.
Any suggestions/builds/pointers are extremely appreciated~!
Extra info: Party consists of a War Priest(former cleric), Rogue, and two sorcerers, 1 is a MC'd barb and draconic bloodline sorc, other I believe is a nature sorc (has a bear companion)

caddmus |
GM is allowing some of us in the party to change to another class/make modifications. I did have a fighter, but might change to a class thats useful in and out of combat.
I was considering Skald, Summoner or Bard. I know Summoner may take extra work (Summon Monster Stats/etc) but I'd be willing to put the effort in.
I have a knack for being a wordsmith, and the GM wanted me to have the option to play it out in-game.
My concern was being able to have the "WOW I'm a bad-ass!" in-combat moments that I did with the fighter, but not be useless out of combat either.
Any suggestions/builds/pointers are extremely appreciated~!
Extra info: Party consists of a War Priest(former cleric), Rogue, and two sorcerers, 1 is a MC'd barb and draconic bloodline sorc, other I believe is a nature sorc (has a bear companion)
How about a paly? With that party build you really should have some one to take a hit, maybe an inquisitor? Both are good me lees if built right and might give you your I'm the face moments.