Free College in USA - Take 2


Off-Topic Discussions

351 to 378 of 378 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | next > last >>

Personally, I had to look up "ostensive." Still not sure what that sentence means. Of course I did drop out of college. Three times.

School sucks!


Coriat wrote:

Well look, if you're using a different definition of diploma mill than the rest of us, I'm not going to argue that it isn't a diploma mill by your definition. In fact if I had understood that that was the kind of debate that I was going to be drawn into I never would have entered it. I will voice a complaint that you in no way indicated prior to my discovering it that you were using a definition of 'diploma mill' so different from the commonly available one, though.

I feel mildly disgruntled that you weren't clear about any of this to start and that it's only after a page and a half of discussing all this that that it emerges, "Oh, I didn't mean it was THAT kind of diploma mill, you know, the kind indicated by ordinary usage of the phrase."

:/

Actually, until you brought it up, his definition of diploma mill was pretty much the only one I have been familiar with. University of Pheonix, DeVry, ITT Tech are more or less the standard-bearers of the title from what I understand.


Hm. Perhaps I should ease my mild disgruntlement. But I'll still point out that - an hour later now - every single resource I have located so far outside of this thread still is more in line with the stuff I used here, and not the definition that makes possessing a non regional accreditation automatically equivalent to being a diploma mill.

Although Wiki did have a line about how in addition to the primary use there was also a pejorative use of any school that the phrase-user thought had low quality, which is partway there.

So, it's my understanding that those universities might be pejoratively described as diploma mills, but that they actually aren't, they're just bad universities? And that non regionally accredited schools are also not automatically diploma mills, that is something reserved for the more fraudulent ones? And Orfamay disagrees with the latter?


As for actual use of a degree from University of the People, I'm not really sure how I feel about them. I could see a lot of people with the CS degrees stuck in the same position as people graduating from ITT tech, where they are in a hard spot to get a position outside of basic tech support. Business Administration degrees are not really valuable on their own for getting you a job past administrative assistant. That being said, for someone who is on a limited budget, those jobs could very well be a solid step up.
I could also see both of these being useful for professionals looking to expand their education inexpensively. CS knowledge is becoming more important for other engineering disiplines and BAs will definitely help small business owners, even if those degrees will not lead to immediate employment.

Liberty's Edge

Comrade Anklebiter wrote:

Personally, I had to look up "ostensive." Still not sure what that sentence means. Of course I did drop out of college. Three times.

School sucks!

That's alright Gobbo. Based on usage I don't think OQ knows what it means either.


Caineach wrote:

BAs will definitely help small business owners, even if those degrees will not lead to immediate employment.

I know my boss never did anything with his other than use what he learned to start a business. I was going to say that he wouldn't likely have been interested in UotP because of money (he was a high altitude guide in Nepal, which paid relatively better than most Nepali jobs), but on second thought I might be wrong. He does occasionally tell horror stories of going from work to school to work to school to work etc without sleep, eating in the car on the way in between, and such. Maybe he would have taken a cheaper option, since he was never going to use the thing academically.


Krensky wrote:
Comrade Anklebiter wrote:

Personally, I had to look up "ostensive." Still not sure what that sentence means. Of course I did drop out of college. Three times.

School sucks!

That's alright Gobbo. Based on usage I don't think OQ knows what it means either.

I thought it was a weird tyope for "extensive". Or an even weirder one for "expansive".


Orfamay Quest wrote:
So what does that say about colleges that can't even meet the necessary hurdles for regional accreditation?

Um, are we assuming that the school has sought and failed regional accreditation? It seems to be pretty much brand new, only taking off in the last year or two, and regional accreditation appears to be a years long process.

But. I still think if you're going to brand something a 'card carrying diploma mill' then I shouldn't be able to go looking for lists of warning signs that a school is a diploma mill, and find that the school in question fulfils 0% of them. Or at very least, if you're going to say that in a case where I will be able to do that, you should be clear beforehand that you're working under a (still uncited, despite multiple requests) definition very different from the one I will get in a dictionary , from authoritative institutions, from websites talking about diploma mills, from Wikipedia, etc, etc, etc.


In other news (anecdote warning), I was talking to my high school teacher sister about this whole idea of free community college, and she felt fairly ambivalent about it and also advanced the idea that a focus on early childhood education might deliver the best results.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Coriat wrote:
In other news (anecdote warning), I was talking to my high school teacher sister about this whole idea of free community college, and she felt fairly ambivalent about it and also advanced the idea that a focus on early childhood education might deliver the best results.

Point out to your sister that the western nations which ALREADY HAVE free higher education are on the whole better educated per capita than the average American.

It's also not a this or that question. Early childhood education DOES need a revamp, but it shouldn't be that or better access to higher education;

Americans used to be the best educated people on the planet, we've fallen far from that standard, and the bloody shame of it all is that it did not need to happen, there simply is no excuse. outside of Americans' willful love of ignorance.


Coriat wrote:
In other news (anecdote warning), I was talking to my high school teacher sister about this whole idea of free community college, and she felt fairly ambivalent about it and also advanced the idea that a focus on early childhood education might deliver the best results.

As a high school teacher, I would be curious to know how she feels about the idea of high school as a vocational/associates system rather than the current paradigm.

Essentially, any course taken after 11th grade should have the rigor and requirements to fulfill course requisites for an equivilantly named/numbered course that would apply toward an academic or vocational credential.

And then, obviously, put high schools in a position to grant that credential or facilitate transfer to a local community college where it could be obtained in less than a year.

Basically, I think that the Obama strategy could be implemented for little to no cost if we work to remove the redundant and superfluous courses being taught at high schools today.


Coriat wrote:
In other news (anecdote warning), I was talking to my high school teacher sister about this whole idea of free community college, and she felt fairly ambivalent about it and also advanced the idea that a focus on early childhood education might deliver the best results.

The exra boost on early childhood seems to level off after a few years. I don't know if its because later years don't pick up the pace, or if its because they can only go as fast as the slowest kids, some of whom did not get the same early childhood education, or if kids brains just aren't ready for information until a certain point.


BigDTBone wrote:
Coriat wrote:
In other news (anecdote warning), I was talking to my high school teacher sister about this whole idea of free community college, and she felt fairly ambivalent about it and also advanced the idea that a focus on early childhood education might deliver the best results.
As a high school teacher, I would be curious to know how she feels about the idea of high school as a vocational/associates system rather than the current paradigm.

I don't know, but I'll ask sometime.


Gendo wrote:

Here's my take on school in general:

K - 8th grade, everyone taught same thing. In 8th grade you decide whether or not you want to go onto College.
If Yes, then you are sent to High School for 9 - 12th grade and begin College Prep and some College Courses toward the career and degree of your choosing.
If No, then you are sent to a Votech to learn a trade, have an apprenticeship, and learn life skills for 2 or 3 years. At the end of which you are ready to employed in the "real world".

This would free up money so that Colleges would not have to be tuition based.

Would require a much larger societal shift though than just restructuring the education system. How many people have decided what they want to do in life at 9th grade? And how many of those people, even if they are not really interested in college, would get the parental/peer pressure to take the college option?

I feel like a lot of kids don't really get what college really is. Even decent students can flunk out when presented with the absent of parental oversight and being placed in charge of their own education.

I don't disagree with your proposal, just think it might be difficult to apply now


MMCJawa wrote:
Gendo wrote:

Here's my take on school in general:

K - 8th grade, everyone taught same thing. In 8th grade you decide whether or not you want to go onto College.
If Yes, then you are sent to High School for 9 - 12th grade and begin College Prep and some College Courses toward the career and degree of your choosing.
If No, then you are sent to a Votech to learn a trade, have an apprenticeship, and learn life skills for 2 or 3 years. At the end of which you are ready to employed in the "real world".

This would free up money so that Colleges would not have to be tuition based.

Would require a much larger societal shift though than just restructuring the education system. How many people have decided what they want to do in life at 9th grade? And how many of those people, even if they are not really interested in college, would get the parental/peer pressure to take the college option?

I feel like a lot of kids don't really get what college really is. Even decent students can flunk out when presented with the absent of parental oversight and being placed in charge of their own education.

I don't disagree with your proposal, just think it might be difficult to apply now

Hell, I think the majority of college students change major.


Yeah, I've got to say committing yourself to major life roles at 14 really isn't a good idea. Not in our society, with no job security and long education required for most things.
If you went Votech, you're not even in a good position to go back to college as an adult, should you change your mind.

Unlike in the past when you basically took up your father's trade, which was probably farming, like most peoples. Or maybe got apprenticed out to a local craftsman.


IIRC the Prussian -> Imperial German educational system had a pretty strong divide between technical and university paths starting fairly young. I can't comment in any detail, I don't even remember where I read that, but it might be a case study for how it would work.

On the other hand, the economy has changed a lot since those days, and I'm not sure whether the technical path would have mapped closely to the vocational classes of today or not.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'm 38 and I still don't know what I wanna be when I grow up.


Boston School Bus Union Wins Huge Victory

Huzzah!

Forward to communism!

EDIT: Only available to Facebook users?!? Wtf?!? [Goes to gooogle]

[Comes back]

Well, Red Steve got off.

Huzzah!!


Facebooks evil is taking away from my beloved goblin communists victory -more proof of Zuckerbergs perfidity!


Non-Facebookicized


Gendo wrote:

Here's my take on school in general:

K - 8th grade, everyone taught same thing. In 8th grade you decide whether or not you want to go onto College.
If Yes, then you are sent to High School for 9 - 12th grade and begin College Prep and some College Courses toward the career and degree of your choosing.
If No, then you are sent to a Votech to learn a trade, have an apprenticeship, and learn life skills for 2 or 3 years. At the end of which you are ready to employed in the "real world".

This would free up money so that Colleges would not have to be tuition based.

That's pretty much the sum of my positive argument on the first Free Education thread.

Quote:
Next

As for all the discussion around what is and isn't a Diploma Mill. Well, what I said up-thread:

I never said the University of the People was a Diploma Mill. Just strongly implied it's not that much better.

- Touting a bunch of big names (Yale, City University of NY, Clinton, etc).
- Been in existence for 6 years but only offering two very pedestrian degrees.
- "National Accreditation"... for what it's worth, and apparently that's not much.
- THIS place has more accreditation and academic respect.
- Even the University of Phoenix seems to have a stronger reputation!

So no, the Crow is technically (if pedantically) right. It's not a Diploma Mill but, to date, it might as well be for all the good it will do it's students.

Quote:
Next

I tried to get the discussion to give us some ideas on what would work in lieu of education. Since, as was stated by others up thread, simply applying more education won't do the trick.

That effort fell to nothing however. Perhaps it's because I "argue with a cudgel" as Irontruth so helpfully pointed out (no sarcasm here, I think Irontruth is largely correct on this one point). Perhaps not.

I managed to find two groups of national prominence, Boys and Girls Club and Big Brothers Big Sisters, that seem to fill in the gaps noted by others recently - namely that earlier intervention will obviate the need for a more concerted (and generally wasted) effort on kids in their teens.

Otherwise all I've found are penny-ante efforts like The Door Campaign, which, while commendable, really amount to buffing a rusting junker when compared to the need nationally.

So I was hoping there were other stories from those who so vehemently disagree with my person that could enlighten us on what might effectively be done for people who need so much more than Free Tuition. Since, as we all seem to agree, by the time they need free tuition so much else that is foundational to a whole and healthy person has been woefully neglected.

Alas, no one has offered anything. A shame really but not surprising.

And yes, chalk up yet another "victory" for my cynicism!

Alas, were I actually joyful about "winning" my arguments in this way my detractors might actually have something worth picking on when they level their ad hominem posts at me.

Quote:
Next

As for the whole ad hominem issue:

Mostly what's been said doesn't bother me as I take it for what it's worth. Which is to say nothing.

However, I need to point out that after paging through the thread there is a certain person, who I'll cryptically call Laim Larkwynd, that hasn't provided a single positive argument to this entire discussion. Not -- a -- single -- one.

Lame indeed.


Here's my argument: School sucks!


Comrade Anklebiter wrote:
Here's my argument: School sucks!

Does it suck worse than no school?


Went to a birthday party for a UFT member with a buncha educators last night. Was disappointed to discover that it was less Teacher Snow Day, more Frat Kid Binge Drinking.


There's a difference?


Not as much "Fifty Shades sex."

Anyway, article La Principessa was sharing on Facebook:

Forget Education Saviors – They Aren’t Coming


Watched this: Coding Academies.

Seems like more of an Infomercial than actual reporting. On the face of it it's uplifting but looking a little closer we see that, as mentioned, the acceptance rate is more selective than Harvard (yes that Harvard) and so we see another great idea that really only helps those who were on their way to a successful career already. Except the one guy who got in because of some sort of affirmative action scholarship and who took good advantage of his situation because = smart.

sigh

351 to 378 of 378 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / Free College in USA - Take 2 All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Off-Topic Discussions
Deep 6 FaWtL
Quotes Thread
Weird News Stories
Good New Stories
Did you know...?
Ramblin' Man