Summoning, polymorph, and books needed.


Pathfinder Society

301 to 350 of 380 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | next > last >>
Grand Lodge 5/5

Marthkus wrote:

@Seth

1. Right you are. Sorry

2. Of course the player would still need to own the bestiary, but they should still be able to have their NPC friend pick feats that the CRB says they can take. Just because the a player can't pick these choices for their PC, doesn't mean that their NPC pet can't.

1. Meh, no problem. I've been called worse. ;)

2.

Additional Resource Page wrote:

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game: Bestiary

Animal Companions: ankylosaurus, aurochs, brachiosaurus, dire bat, dire rat, dolphin, elasmosaurus, electric eel, elephant/mastodon, frog, goblin dog, hyena, monitor lizard, moray eel, octopus, orca, pteranodon, rhinoceros, roc, squid, stegosaurus, triceratops, and tyrannosaurus; Familiars: all familiars listed on pages 131–133; Feats: none of the feats are legal for play for PCs, animal companions, or familiars unless specifically granted by another legal source. Other: all creatures in this book are legal for polymorph effects (including a druid's wild shape ability) within the boundaries of each spell or ability's parameters.

Emphasis mine. And the Bestiary 2 and 3 have similar entries.

1/5

Even though ACs are controlled by the GM you must own any additional resources you are using with them. You cant cop out by saying they are gm controlled. Improved natural armor and improved natural attack are in the bestiary not CRB so you must have the bestiary to use them. You are complaining about the cost of printing paper that costs pennies per page. Pens and pencils are required to play too. So are dice. Your character sheets are required to play too. You're just arguing for the sake of arguing so I'm just gonna leave you be. There are plenty of cheaper hobbies to try. If your post history is indicative of your total time playing PFS, I've been playing about as long as you in that I started playing PFS in march 2013. Before that, in my home games, I only owned the core book and used d20pfsrd for everything. PFS gives you more consistent gaming sessions that don't depend on the schedule of your friends. The drawback is that you have to buy books to play. I see it as a fair trade. I am sorry that you don't.


Seth Gipson wrote:
Marthkus wrote:

@Seth

1. Right you are. Sorry

2. Of course the player would still need to own the bestiary, but they should still be able to have their NPC friend pick feats that the CRB says they can take. Just because the a player can't pick these choices for their PC, doesn't mean that their NPC pet can't.

1. Meh, no problem. I've been called worse. ;)

2.

Additional Resource Page wrote:

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game: Bestiary

Animal Companions: ankylosaurus, aurochs, brachiosaurus, dire bat, dire rat, dolphin, elasmosaurus, electric eel, elephant/mastodon, frog, goblin dog, hyena, monitor lizard, moray eel, octopus, orca, pteranodon, rhinoceros, roc, squid, stegosaurus, triceratops, and tyrannosaurus; Familiars: all familiars listed on pages 131–133; Feats: none of the feats are legal for play for PCs, animal companions, or familiars unless specifically granted by another legal source. Other: all creatures in this book are legal for polymorph effects (including a druid's wild shape ability) within the boundaries of each spell or ability's parameters.

Emphasis mine. And the Bestiary 2 and 3 have similar entries.

Unless granted by another legal source.

The CRB grants access. Do that not work?

Grand Lodge 5/5

Marthkus wrote:
Seth Gipson wrote:
Marthkus wrote:

@Seth

1. Right you are. Sorry

2. Of course the player would still need to own the bestiary, but they should still be able to have their NPC friend pick feats that the CRB says they can take. Just because the a player can't pick these choices for their PC, doesn't mean that their NPC pet can't.

1. Meh, no problem. I've been called worse. ;)

2.

Additional Resource Page wrote:

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game: Bestiary

Animal Companions: ankylosaurus, aurochs, brachiosaurus, dire bat, dire rat, dolphin, elasmosaurus, electric eel, elephant/mastodon, frog, goblin dog, hyena, monitor lizard, moray eel, octopus, orca, pteranodon, rhinoceros, roc, squid, stegosaurus, triceratops, and tyrannosaurus; Familiars: all familiars listed on pages 131–133; Feats: none of the feats are legal for play for PCs, animal companions, or familiars unless specifically granted by another legal source. Other: all creatures in this book are legal for polymorph effects (including a druid's wild shape ability) within the boundaries of each spell or ability's parameters.

Emphasis mine. And the Bestiary 2 and 3 have similar entries.

Unless granted by another legal source.

The CRB grants access. Do that not work?

You could argue it that way if you wanted to, but I believe the intention is that the feat needs to be printed in another source and then the feat in THAT source is listed on the Additional Resource page as being legal for PFS.

I see what you mean by your question, but if you sat at a table and argued it that way, I think youd be disappointed. :/

5/5

Seth Gipson wrote:
Marthkus wrote:
Seth Gipson wrote:
Marthkus wrote:

@Seth

1. Right you are. Sorry

2. Of course the player would still need to own the bestiary, but they should still be able to have their NPC friend pick feats that the CRB says they can take. Just because the a player can't pick these choices for their PC, doesn't mean that their NPC pet can't.

1. Meh, no problem. I've been called worse. ;)

2.

Additional Resource Page wrote:

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game: Bestiary

Animal Companions: ankylosaurus, aurochs, brachiosaurus, dire bat, dire rat, dolphin, elasmosaurus, electric eel, elephant/mastodon, frog, goblin dog, hyena, monitor lizard, moray eel, octopus, orca, pteranodon, rhinoceros, roc, squid, stegosaurus, triceratops, and tyrannosaurus; Familiars: all familiars listed on pages 131–133; Feats: none of the feats are legal for play for PCs, animal companions, or familiars unless specifically granted by another legal source. Other: all creatures in this book are legal for polymorph effects (including a druid's wild shape ability) within the boundaries of each spell or ability's parameters.

Emphasis mine. And the Bestiary 2 and 3 have similar entries.

Unless granted by another legal source.

The CRB grants access. Do that not work?

You could argue it that way if you wanted to, but I believe the intention is that the feat needs to be printed in another source and then the feat in THAT source is listed on the Additional Resource page as being legal for PFS.

I see what you mean by your question, but if you sat at a table and argued it that way, I think youd be disappointed. :/

I'd have to disagree with you on this one Seth. It's the same reasoning that a natural weapon ranger from the APG can gain access to multiattack and imp natural attack. The CRB is specifically granting access to those feats for animal companions. The feat doesn't have to be reprinted, you just have to be specifically granted the right to use them.

5/5

Marthkus wrote:

@Seth

1. Right you are. Sorry

2. Of course the player would still need to own the bestiary, but they should still be able to have their NPC friend pick feats that the CRB says they can take. Just because the a player can't pick these choices for their PC, doesn't mean that their NPC pet can't.

The Animal Companion doesn't have the intelligence to pick the feat, the PC/Player does... so therefore.... no.

The Exchange 5/5 RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16

Or the animal companion chooses some other feat. Skill Focus (Perform ( cute tricks)). After all, if it isn't the player's choice ...

5/5

Purple Fluffy CatBunnyGnome wrote:
Marthkus wrote:

@Seth

1. Right you are. Sorry

2. Of course the player would still need to own the bestiary, but they should still be able to have their NPC friend pick feats that the CRB says they can take. Just because the a player can't pick these choices for their PC, doesn't mean that their NPC pet can't.

The Animal Companion doesn't have the intelligence to pick the feat, the PC/Player does... so therefore.... no.

The Animal Companion only needs an int of 3 or better take take a feat not specifically called out in the CRB as an "Animal Feat". Improved Natural Armor and Improved Natural Attack are called in that section as available to companions.

IMO, that also fulfills the being granted by another legal source(the CRB) to take a Bestiary feat.

Scarab Sages

Seth Gipson wrote:
Robert A Matthews wrote:
CRB says Animal Companions can take Improved Natural Armor and Improved Natural attack. Those feats are also in the Bestiary. If you don't have the Bestiary you can always choose a different character option.

This will likely just make the thread go longer, but in PFS, unless a feat from the Bestiary (like the two you name in the quote) is also printed in another PFS-legal source, you cannot take feats from the Bestiary.

To my knowledge, none of them are re-printed in another legal source, so Improved Nat Armor, Improved Nat Attack, Hover, Flyby Attack, etc cant be taken by animal companions, eidolons, familiars, mounts, or anything else.

I'll have to check out the latest Guide when I get home, to see what's been explicitly allowed in. Not that it affects anything I've already taken, but for future planning.

I thought the intent of the rule was to prevent PCs from taking inappropriate feats from the Bestiary, not their animals.
The Bestiary feats ought to be more appropriate to animals, than some of the CRB feats, frankly.
But they don't want Fly-By Alchemists playing Dambusters, or Monks confusing everyone applying Improved Natural Attack to their fists. Half-Orcs with a bite attack that 'counts as Large bite'. etc.
Which I can understand.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

Seth Gipson wrote:
Robert A Matthews wrote:
CRB says Animal Companions can take Improved Natural Armor and Improved Natural attack. Those feats are also in the Bestiary. If you don't have the Bestiary you can always choose a different character option.

This will likely just make the thread go longer, but in PFS, unless a feat from the Bestiary (like the two you name in the quote) is also printed in another PFS-legal source, you cannot take feats from the Bestiary.

To my knowledge, none of them are re-printed in another legal source, so Improved Nat Armor, Improved Nat Attack, Hover, Flyby Attack, etc cant be taken by animal companions, eidolons, familiars, mounts, or anything else.

It is the access that needs to be printed in another source, not the entire feat.

Since the animal companion entry for Druid says they can take these feats, they can take those feats.

Because the Ranger Natural Attack specialist from either APG or UC (forget which) grants access to some Bestiary feats, they can take those feats.

5/5

Sniggevert wrote:
Purple Fluffy CatBunnyGnome wrote:
Marthkus wrote:

@Seth

1. Right you are. Sorry

2. Of course the player would still need to own the bestiary, but they should still be able to have their NPC friend pick feats that the CRB says they can take. Just because the a player can't pick these choices for their PC, doesn't mean that their NPC pet can't.

The Animal Companion doesn't have the intelligence to pick the feat, the PC/Player does... so therefore.... no.

The Animal Companion only needs an int of 3 or better take take a feat not specifically called out in the CRB as an "Animal Feat". Improved Natural Armor and Improved Natural Attack are called in that section as available to companions.

IMO, that also fulfills the being granted by another legal source(the CRB) to take a Bestiary feat.

The way I interpreted his post (because that's all this thread is really about) is that the AC was the one that picked the feat not the PC and since the AC is an NPC therefore the AC could pick the feat out of the bestiary.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

Marthkus wrote:

@Step

Animal companions are NPCs so it is not the player taking a feat from the Bestiary.

Animal Companions are not NPCs. They are a class feature that sometimes are controlled by the GM, and sometimes by the player.

Per Ultimate Campaign: If they are non-sentient (Int 1 or 2) they are technically GM controlled. The character can try to direct the creature with Handle Animal, but the GM has final say on what the animal does.

If the Animal has a 3+ Int, it becomes fully Character controlled. So after level 4, it is likely that the animal will no longer be GM controlled at all.

Sovereign Court 5/5 RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Chris Mortika wrote:
Or the animal companion chooses some other feat. Skill Focus (Perform ( cute tricks)). After all, if it isn't the player's choice ...

I prefer Perform (Mime).

"Your bear would attack, but he appears to be trapped in an invisible box..."

Grand Lodge 5/5

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Matthew Morris wrote:
Chris Mortika wrote:
Or the animal companion chooses some other feat. Skill Focus (Perform ( cute tricks)). After all, if it isn't the player's choice ...

I prefer Perform (Mime).

"Your bear would attack, but he appears to be trapped in an invisible box..."

Step 1: Cut a hole in the box

2: Put yo bear in that box
3: Make her open the box

Lantern Lodge 4/5

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Seth Gipson wrote:
Matthew Morris wrote:
Chris Mortika wrote:
Or the animal companion chooses some other feat. Skill Focus (Perform ( cute tricks)). After all, if it isn't the player's choice ...

I prefer Perform (Mime).

"Your bear would attack, but he appears to be trapped in an invisible box..."

Step 1: Cut a hole in the box

2: Put yo bear in that box
3: Make her open the box

Crystalhue, bear in a box.

Evoking Day, bear in a box.
Jestercap, bear in a box.
Every single holiday a bear in a box.

Silver Crusade 4/5

3 people marked this as a favorite.

So, seeing how long this thread was, I skipped from the first page to the last page without reading most of the thread. I'm having a hard time deciding which is sillier - the claim that you can use monster stats in PFS without owning the book that those stats come from, the claim that a player can force the GM to run their summoned critters, or the jokes about a bear with mime skills. Given the context, the mime bears just don't seem that silly.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

Amanda Holdridge wrote:
Seth Gipson wrote:
Matthew Morris wrote:
Chris Mortika wrote:
Or the animal companion chooses some other feat. Skill Focus (Perform ( cute tricks)). After all, if it isn't the player's choice ...

I prefer Perform (Mime).

"Your bear would attack, but he appears to be trapped in an invisible box..."

Step 1: Cut a hole in the box

2: Put yo bear in that box
3: Make her open the box

Crystalhue, bear in a box.

Evoking Day, bear in a box.
Jestercap, bear in a box.
Every single holiday a bear in a box.

Woo! I can barely contain my excitement at this prospect!

Lantern Lodge 3/5

Andrew Christian wrote:
Amanda Holdridge wrote:
Seth Gipson wrote:
Matthew Morris wrote:
Chris Mortika wrote:
Or the animal companion chooses some other feat. Skill Focus (Perform ( cute tricks)). After all, if it isn't the player's choice ...

I prefer Perform (Mime).

"Your bear would attack, but he appears to be trapped in an invisible box..."

Step 1: Cut a hole in the box

2: Put yo bear in that box
3: Make her open the box

Crystalhue, bear in a box.

Evoking Day, bear in a box.
Jestercap, bear in a box.
Every single holiday a bear in a box.
Woo! I can barely contain my excitement at this prospect!

Hah! That was bad, Andrew, just bad. Way to be the bearer of bad jokes.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

Lormyr wrote:
Andrew Christian wrote:
Amanda Holdridge wrote:
Seth Gipson wrote:
Matthew Morris wrote:
Chris Mortika wrote:
Or the animal companion chooses some other feat. Skill Focus (Perform ( cute tricks)). After all, if it isn't the player's choice ...

I prefer Perform (Mime).

"Your bear would attack, but he appears to be trapped in an invisible box..."

Step 1: Cut a hole in the box

2: Put yo bear in that box
3: Make her open the box

Crystalhue, bear in a box.

Evoking Day, bear in a box.
Jestercap, bear in a box.
Every single holiday a bear in a box.
Woo! I can barely contain my excitement at this prospect!
Hah! That was bad, Andrew, just bad. Way to be the bearer of bad jokes.

I get them from staring at the stars, specifically Ursa Major.

Sovereign Court 5/5 RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

Picture a bear in an invisible box.

It's a real Kodiak moment.

Grand Lodge 5/5

These jokes are getting unbearable.

The Exchange 5/5 RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16

Or the bear getting caught in a roll of Reynolds wrap.

"Ursus! Foiled again!'

Liberty's Edge 5/5

Seth Gipson wrote:
These jokes are getting unbearable.

Yes, and very polar-izing.

Sovereign Court 5/5 RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

*slow clap*

I was trying to think of an Ursus pun, and couldn't.

5/5

stops to catch her breath from giggling... bear with me

Sovereign Court 5/5 RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

Seth Gipson wrote:
These jokes are getting unbearable.

So you want us to Koala them off?

(Yes, I know not a bear)

Liberty's Edge 5/5

ok, ok... sorry I started this... now these jokes are just getting...

wait for it...

teddy-ous.

The Exchange 5/5 RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16

From the Omnificent English Dictionary in Limerick Form, a definition:

When a bearing is bearing a weight,
Then its bearing may not be quite straight.
In straits dire we're daring,
'Cause I think that we're bearing
Straightaway towards the great Bering Strait.

Grand Lodge 5/5

Andrew Christian wrote:

ok, ok... sorry I started this... now these jokes are just getting...

wait for it...

teddy-ous.

I think Kyle Baird would enjoy that pun very much.

:P

5/5

awww

When I go to the beach, I feel fine,
'Cause my two-piece looks really divine!
Though it bares lots of skin,
It makes me look thin,
So I bear with its daring design

Sovereign Court 5/5 RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

I think we're in fur a long line of bear puns.

Inevitable claws and effect of long threads.

5/5

Be patient, bear with me, my friend.
The secrecy's here to defend.
Information will flow
When you have need to know.
You'll be told every thing in the end.

Sovereign Court 5/5 RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

Bears go in the woods
Additional resources
Or just the core book?

1/5

BACON!

If a thread on this forum goes seriously off-track, it should be bacon related

Grand Lodge 5/5

Lab_Rat wrote:

BACON!

If a thread on this forum goes seriously off-track, it should be bacon related

C-C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER!!!

Beclaws of you, our run on bear jokes is ruined!

5/5

I wonder if there is such a thing as bear bacon?

mmmmmmm now I'm in the mood for some candied yogi... dang it

Liberty's Edge 5/5

barely Seth.

I think bear bacon would be tasty.

Silver Crusade 4/5

This thread is getting unbearable. These are some truly grisly puns. At this point, we're really scraping the bottom of the bear-el.

Grand Lodge 5/5

Fromper wrote:

This thread is getting unbearable. These are some truly grisly puns. At this point, we're really scraping the bottom of the bear-el.

Be careful with that scraping. You wouldnt want to get a Boo Boo.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

Seth Gipson wrote:
Fromper wrote:

This thread is getting unbearable. These are some truly grisly puns. At this point, we're really scraping the bottom of the bear-el.

Be careful with that scraping. You wouldnt want to get a Boo Boo.

Hey, hey... we're smarter than the average Bear!

Sovereign Court 5/5 RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

But what about the ranger Yogi?

Hey hey Boo Boo, let him bond with his companions instead!

Grand Lodge 4/5

I reserve the right to arm bears.

I also reserve the right to crash that Teddy Bear picnic in the woods.

Of course, if I armed the teddies, it might hurt...

What do you call a bear with a razor?

Spoiler:
Fuzzy Wuzzy, of course!

Sort of back on track (bacon is too fat, give me good BBQ ribs every time), the CRB gives ACs access to certain feats from the Bestiary. However, for the AC to be able to take any of those feats, the player who has the AC needs to have a copy of the Bestiary available in case the GM needs to verify the exact wording of any of those feats taken.

Now, it may be possible that the GM has that available, but, sometimes, she won't. I ran a sanctioned game the other day that only used the CRB and Bestiary 2 as sources for almost all the NPCs and critters. No need for the Bestiary then, huh...

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

Fromper wrote:
So, seeing how long this thread was, I skipped from the first page to the last page without reading most of the thread.

I did basically the same. Read through the first 100 posts then fast forwarded to now.

How about some dinosaur puns for my Saurian Shaman?

Grand Lodge 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Nefreet wrote:
Fromper wrote:
So, seeing how long this thread was, I skipped from the first page to the last page without reading most of the thread.

I did basically the same. Read through the first 100 posts then fast forwarded to now.

How about some dinosaur puns for my Saurian Shaman?

Dinosaur jokes? Really? Those are SO last period.

Scarab Sages

1 person marked this as a favorite.

About those bear arms...

Scarab Sages

Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bear.
Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair.
Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn't fuzzy, wus he?

Scarab Sages

Fuzzy Wuzzy Bear was shaved,
By a man who was depraved.
Fuzzy Wuzzy, roared and raved,
And took the barber to his grave.

Scarab Sages

Fuzzy Wuzzy's hair was black,
But it never did grow back.
Fuzzy hid his exposed crack
Underneath a plastic mac.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

Bear cavalry

Silver Crusade 4/5

kinevon wrote:


Sort of back on track (bacon is too fat, give me good BBQ ribs every time), the CRB gives ACs access to certain feats from the Bestiary. However, for the AC to be able to take any of those feats, the player who has the AC needs to have a copy of the Bestiary available in case the GM needs to verify the exact wording of any of those feats taken.

Now, it may be possible that the GM has that available, but, sometimes, she won't. I ran a sanctioned game the other day that only used the CRB and Bestiary 2 as sources for almost all the NPCs and critters. No need for the Bestiary then, huh...

Oh, are we going back on topic?

The Bestiary isn't actually required for every GM to bring to the table. It's just that the prd is core assumption for GMs, so they can prepare the specific adventure they're running that day. I almost always bring the scenario with printouts of the relevant Bestiary pages, but not the whole Bestiary.

So yes, anyone who wants to use monster stats that are found in the Bestiary must actually own the Bestiary, per PFS rules. I'm not the type to enforce ownership rules at the table, but you'd better be prepared in case you meet a GM who does. I know I always carry the relevant Bestiary pages, with correct pdf watermark, for my summoning focused PC.

301 to 350 of 380 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Summoning, polymorph, and books needed. All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.