didn't see it, and it was just updated...:(
well...that's a first
.... Wut?
I will apologize for the derail.
so now that I see fresh blood on the forums, anybody else want to weigh in?
Faq updated again...
design teams on a roll, lets get those FAQs people so that this will be settled once and for all. by the by this also determines what is misprinted in the NPC codex.
I'm actually surprised by the ruling on retraining (even though I posted that the nearest precedent (Fighter retraining) allowed you to retrain to a feat you didn't qualify for originally.
So who knows what direction a ruling on this one will go. :P
I'm actually surprised by the ruling on retraining (even though I posted that the nearest precedent (Fighter retraining) allowed you to retrain to a feat you didn't qualify for originally.
So who knows what direction a ruling on this one will go. :P
half of me hopes I am wrong for some decent EK builds, the other half worries about what early level cheese combined with such a ruling could push the MT into synergy territory. either way I don't expect them to go for it.
no takers on the Faq huh...
and now weapon cords got FAQ'd, come on people it should only take a few more FAQ clicks.
It did? I'm not seeing any new posts by the PDT...
they are move actions now, it's being changed in upcoming printings. They removed the recommended amount of free actions as well. no more gunslinger cheese.
edit:link
Owner - D20 Hobbies
|
and now weapon cords got FAQ'd, come on people it should only take a few more FAQ clicks.
There are other threads with more FAQ clicks, so they don't always answer the highest FAQ click first.
I imagine there will be some that get clicks they don't feel the need to answer because the confusion comes from some of us being overly pedantic.
and now weapon cords got FAQ'd, come on people it should only take a few more FAQ clicks.There are other threads with more FAQ clicks, so they don't always answer the highest FAQ click first.
I imagine there will be some that get clicks they don't feel the need to answer because the confusion comes from some of us being overly pedantic.
They have a status for that actually - it's "No response required".
My guess is that there's either a split within the design staff on how this should work, or they're planning on answering the question in an upcoming release.
|
they are move actions now, it's being changed in upcoming printings. They removed the recommended amount of free actions as well. no more gunslinger cheese.
edit:link
No more cheap cheese. Now they have to wait until they can afford a Glove of Storing.
And FAQ updated yet again.
:'(
Do you think if I baked a cake and sent it to them, then this might be moved up on the docket? Or will sucking up make them mad...
You can bake a cake and send it to me. I like cake.
Unfortunately, I have no power to move this up on the docket.
But still, I like cake. mmm mmm good
Looking at the most recent FAQs I'm shocked there aren't more threads about the weapon cord nerf.
Looking at the most recent FAQs I'm shocked there aren't more threads about the weapon cord nerf.The weapon cord nerf was a suggestion to fix the gunslinger in lieu of the free action faq.
I'm guessing that the folks most likely to have complained - the dual-wielding double-barreled pistoleros - were probably too busy retraining their characters to complain... ;)
Looking at the most recent FAQs I'm shocked there aren't more threads about the weapon cord nerf.
No complaints for me. I've been on the "ban weapon cords entirely" bandwagon since I first read the item. They're ridiculous on their own, without any pistol-juggling free action reloading nonsense. Having a caster supposedly making precise somatic gestures with his "free" hand that has a four foot sword tied to it has never seemed reasonable to me.
Now that weapon cords are nerfed, please use that Swift Action to hit FAQ on this thread, people.
Do you think if I baked a cake and sent it to them, then this might be moved up on the docket? Or will sucking up make them mad...
Where's my cake?
Do you think if I baked a cake and sent it to them, then this might be moved up on the docket? Or will sucking up make them mad...Where's my cake?
the cake is a lie
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Do you think if I baked a cake and sent it to them, then this might be moved up on the docket? Or will sucking up make them mad...Where's my cake?
Never mind the cake; I'm still waiting for my promised Modest Mouse Bloodline.
I heard them, but the plain text of the PrC goes against it.
The existence of the thread proves this statement patently false, James. If the plain text had one and only one possible meaning, then this thread wouldn't exist. That's what you keep refusing to notice\accept.
Regardless of whether I agree with you or not, I recognize that what you claim to be explicitly clear simply cannot be explicitly clear, because if it were, there wouldn't be any disagreement on the matter. The existence of the thread, and the plethora of different opinions, proves that your statement is flat invalid.