Profession: Assassin?


Pathfinder Society

151 to 168 of 168 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>
The Exchange 5/5

Chris Mortika wrote:

I agree with BNW that it would get a warning. I would be a little harder-nosed.

"I'd like to roll my profession (assassin) day job.

"Fantastic. What do you get. and oh, by the way, who's your target?"

"I get a 23. And I dunno. Just some guy."

"Killing just some guy for 20 gold would be an evil act, requiring an atonement. Did you want to follow through with that assignment?"

"Do I get to pick another attempt? Or maybe roll my craft (pottery) skill instead?

Nope. But you do get to be edgy, which I imagine is the point.

Sigfred, The Day Job is a net gain sort of roll. So I imagine someone spending 9980 gp for equipment and informants and bribes to off the Governor of a Razmiran town, to earn the 10,000 gp reward.

Do you do the same for any other professions?

Pirate? Slaver? Tax auditor? Lawyer? Pathfinder?

Why are you treating this one special?

And why are you trying to entrap a player? If you object to the Profession, why not just tell the player so he can adjust for the "special circumstances" of playing at your table?

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

Earl Gendron wrote:
I'm pretty sure there's a season 5 or 6 scenario that has a profession:assassin skill check which PCs could make in it.

Having the skill is not a problem. Making a living with it probably is.

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

nosig wrote:
Chris Mortika wrote:

I agree with BNW that it would get a warning. I would be a little harder-nosed.

"I'd like to roll my profession (assassin) day job.

"Fantastic. What do you get. and oh, by the way, who's your target?"

"I get a 23. And I dunno. Just some guy."

"Killing just some guy for 20 gold would be an evil act, requiring an atonement. Did you want to follow through with that assignment?"

"Do I get to pick another attempt? Or maybe roll my craft (pottery) skill instead?

Nope. But you do get to be edgy, which I imagine is the point.

Sigfred, The Day Job is a net gain sort of roll. So I imagine someone spending 9980 gp for equipment and informants and bribes to off the Governor of a Razmiran town, to earn the 10,000 gp reward.

Do you do the same for any other professions?

Sure. See profession Torturer

nosig wrote:
Pirate?

Unless you are a privateer, yeah, certainly at least chaotic, probably evil.

nosig wrote:
Slaver?

Depends. As pointed out elsewhere some slavery in Pathfinder is debt slavery, other is criminal punishment.

nosig wrote:
Tax auditor? Lawyer? Pathfinder?

Not actually evil. In fact, in the last scenario I ran, the players didn't kill anyone who was not already dead.

nosig wrote:
"special circumstances" of playing at your table?

No evil PCs is not a special circumstance

The Exchange 5/5 RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16

Andy, you're right.

--

Chris Mortika wrote:

I agree with BNW that it would get a warning. I would be a little harder-nosed.

"I'd like to roll my profession (assassin) day job.

"Fantastic. What do you get. and oh, by the way, who's your target?"

"I get a 23. And I dunno. Just some guy."

"Killing just some guy for 20 gold would be an evil act, requiring an atonement. Did you want to follow through with that assignment?"

"Do I get to pick another attempt? Or maybe roll my craft (pottery) skill instead?

Nope. But you do get to be edgy, which I imagine is the point.

nosig wrote:
Do you do the same for any other professions? Pirate? Slaver? Tax auditor? Lawyer? Pathfinder?

Yes, nosig. If someone says they are making a Day Job roll for profession lawyer or Pathfinder, I mark their Chronicle as evil.

Quote:
Why are you treating this one special?

Because assassins kill people for money. If I recall correctly,you see the Day job roll as a mechanic while I see the Day Job as something the character does. So I really don't think we are going to sway each other on this.

Quote:
And why are you trying to entrap a player? If you object to the Profession, why not just tell the player so he can adjust for the "special circumstances" of playing at your table?

I do warn the player. "Do you want to follow through with that assignment?"

"If you object to the profession [of assassin-for-hire in Paizo's public-facing organized play campaign] ..." Of course I object to players going around killing innocents for money. If the player wants to walk the edge of what's allowable, I'll be happy to assist. Assassinating wicked people, okay. Assassinating residents of Khatapesh who've gotten on the wrong side of a business rival? Not okay.

And look at what you're objecting to. A player deciding not to take a day job roll that would cost the PC more for clearing the consequences. A lost day job roll. I'm not sending the constables after the assassin. I'm not marking him evil and out of the campaign. The player wants a grimdark PC. Okay. Those can be fun. But here's the line, think twice before you cross it.

To the extent that I have a responsibility to Paizo, as a table judge for the campaign, I want to put the company in a positive light. Decisions like "I assassinate people for money" should have consequences.

5/5 5/55/55/5

The idea that killing people for money is automatically evil is kind of silly in an adventuring game. I would just assume they're killing people that have it coming anyway. Explains the paltry pay...

The Exchange 5/5

Chris Mortika wrote:

Andy, you're right.

--

Chris Mortika wrote:

I agree with BNW that it would get a warning. I would be a little harder-nosed.

"I'd like to roll my profession (assassin) day job.

"Fantastic. What do you get. and oh, by the way, who's your target?"

"I get a 23. And I dunno. Just some guy."

"Killing just some guy for 20 gold would be an evil act, requiring an atonement. Did you want to follow through with that assignment?"

"Do I get to pick another attempt? Or maybe roll my craft (pottery) skill instead?

Nope. But you do get to be edgy, which I imagine is the point.

nosig wrote:
Do you do the same for any other professions? Pirate? Slaver? Tax auditor? Lawyer? Pathfinder?

Yes, nosig. If someone says they are making a Day Job roll for profession lawyer or Pathfinder, I mark their Chronicle as evil.

Quote:
Why are you treating this one special?

Because assassins kill people for money. If I recall correctly, you were fine with PCs earning money from profession (torturer) too, because you see the Day job roll as a mechanic while I see the Day Job as something the character does. So I really don't think we are going to sway each other on this.

Quote:
And why are you trying to entrap a player? If you object to the Profession, why not just tell the player so he can adjust for the "special circumstances" of playing at your table?

I do warn the player. "Do you want to follow through with that assignment?"

"If you object to the profession [of assassin-for-hire in Paizo's public-facing organized play campaign] ..." Of course I object to players going around killing innocents for money. If the player wants to walk the edge of what's allowable, I'll be happy to assist. Assassinating wicked people, okay. Assassinating residents of Khatapesh who've gotten on the wrong side of a business rival? Not okay.

And look at what you're objecting to. A player deciding not to take a day job roll that would cost the PC more for...

What about pirate? Or slaver? (Both of which I object to more than assassin- especially In a world were death is so reversible.)

Do they receive the same warning? The automatic "if you have idea how to NOT do this evil, I am going to assume the worst and punish you for it."

Players/PCs do many things I find objectionable. I don't try to force them into "playing my way" and it feels like we are doing that with this approach.

I have encountered only one player who listed a profession Assassin, and she was not trolling for a negitive response. The response she received was "this is prohibited."
Not a warning, she was told it was outlawed, like profession Torturer?

So I came to the only thread I could find and asked "where is it prohibited?" As I could find none...

So...

What other professions are prohibited? So that I can enforce the rules we have all agreed to play under. (I assume your comment about marking Lawyer PCs as Evil was in jest, it was wasn't it?)

The Exchange 5/5

BigNorseWolf wrote:
The idea that killing people for money is automatically evil is kind of silly in an adventuring game.

The lady with the PC with a rank in Profession Assassion is a retired Army officer.

She compared the to a rank in Profession Soldier,with a specialty of Sniper.

5/5 5/55/55/5

nosig wrote:
BigNorseWolf wrote:
The idea that killing people for money is automatically evil is kind of silly in an adventuring game.

The lady with the PC with a rank in Profession Assassion is a retired Army officer.

She compared the to a rank in Profession Soldier,with a specialty of Sniper.

Lawful types tend to confuse law with good.

Dark Archive 4/5

Hey guys, we got a report of a dead horse, a necromancer, and pharasmite inquisitor walking into the bar here.
What that means, I don't know however. /barstool
Go!

5/5

nosig wrote:


edit: If I am running a cleric of Asmodaus, can I put down as my day job: Profession: Orphanage Day Care Worker? (working for the Cheliaxian goverment in their outreach program) or am I going to have some judge revoke my cleric status for doing "Good Deeds" if I get a "35" on my day job?

Why would it be revoked, thats at least 4 more orpans converted to the one true faith, their souls saved from the chaos in the world

The Exchange 5/5

tlotig wrote:
nosig wrote:


edit: If I am running a cleric of Asmodaus, can I put down as my day job: Profession: Orphanage Day Care Worker? (working for the Cheliaxian goverment in their outreach program) or am I going to have some judge revoke my cleric status for doing "Good Deeds" if I get a "35" on my day job?

Why would it be revoked, thats at least 4 more orpans converted to the one true faith, their souls saved from the chaos in the world

That was my point.

It could, in the opinion of that just, shift my alignment, making me unable to be a cleric of my PCs dirty.... Because of rolling well on a day job check.

Silver Crusade 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Ha!
Profession Orphanage Worker....
It'll drive you to drink!

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
nosig wrote:
tlotig wrote:
nosig wrote:


edit: If I am running a cleric of Asmodaus, can I put down as my day job: Profession: Orphanage Day Care Worker? (working for the Cheliaxian goverment in their outreach program) or am I going to have some judge revoke my cleric status for doing "Good Deeds" if I get a "35" on my day job?

Why would it be revoked, thats at least 4 more orpans converted to the one true faith, their souls saved from the chaos in the world

That was my point.

It could, in the opinion of that just, shift my alignment, making me unable to be a cleric of my PCs dirty.... Because of rolling well on a day job check.

No... because of rolling on that day job check at all.

Silver Crusade 5/5

nosig wrote:
BigNorseWolf wrote:
The idea that killing people for money is automatically evil is kind of silly in an adventuring game.

The lady with the PC with a rank in Profession Assassion is a retired Army officer.

She compared the to a rank in Profession Soldier,with a specialty of Sniper.

Nosig, your player is fine. I've searched for posts from management regarding the matter, and the only outlawed profession I could find was Torturer (resulting in a hilariously uncomfortable search history). Just advise your player that the choice might be looked down on by others, and to be prepared to change it for a session or two if it becomes an issue.

The Exchange 5/5

UndeadMitch wrote:
nosig wrote:
BigNorseWolf wrote:
The idea that killing people for money is automatically evil is kind of silly in an adventuring game.

The lady with the PC with a rank in Profession Assassion is a retired Army officer.

She compared the to a rank in Profession Soldier,with a specialty of Sniper.
Nosig, your player is fine. I've searched for posts from management regarding the matter, and the only outlawed profession I could find was Torturer (resulting in a hilariously uncomfortable search history). Just advise your player that the choice might be looked down on by others, and to be prepared to change it for a session or two if it becomes an issue.

Thank you. Will do (have done so actually).

And thanks.

The Exchange 5/5 RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16

nosig wrote:


It could, in the opinion of that just, shift my alignment, making me unable to be a cleric of my PCs dirty.... Because of rolling well on a day job check.

nosig, you might very well. I wouldn't know, but there are a lot of GMs out there, and some of them make weird calls. If someone decides that your Day Job is in conflict with your character's deity, and you disagree, you should probably discuss that with the event organizer, venture officer, etc. That's standard operating procedure.

I guess I'm not sure what your point is. Right now, alignment penalties for profession (assassin) are a table GM's judgement call. Are you asserting that, because some judgement calls are pretty weird, Day Job activities should not be subject to any judgement calls at all?

Trigger Language:
I keep coming back to it, but on Day One of the campaign switching over to the Pathfinder rules, I had a player at Gen Con who wanted a Day Job for Perform (rape).

Whenever anybody suggests that Day Job checks shouldn't ever have consequences, other than gold rewards -- when, in UndeadMitch's terms, "the only outlawed profession...[is] Torturer" -- that's the example I use as a touchstone, and I simply cannot agree.


nosig, if you cannot see a difference between Profession (lawyer) and Profession (assassin), I don't know how I can explain it.

EDIT: Withdrew an off-topic remark.

5/5

Chris Mortika wrote:
nosig wrote:


It could, in the opinion of that just, shift my alignment, making me unable to be a cleric of my PCs dirty.... Because of rolling well on a day job check.

nosig, you might very well. I wouldn't know, but there are a lot of GMs out there, and some of them make weird calls. If someone decides that your Day Job is in conflict with your character's deity, and you disagree, you should probably discuss that with the event organizer, venture officer, etc. That's standard operating procedure.

I guess I'm not sure what your point is. Right now, alignment penalties for profession (assassin) are a table GM's judgement call. Are you asserting that, because some judgement calls are pretty weird, Day Job activities should not be subject to any judgement calls at all?
** spoiler omitted **
nosig, if you cannot see a difference between Profession (lawyer) and Profession (assassin), I don't know how I can explain it.*

** spoiler omitted **

Hey, buddy! Get off of me!

Dark Archive

Sin of Asmodeus wrote:

Hey guys, we got a report of a dead horse, a necromancer, and pharasmite inquisitor walking into the bar here.

What that means, I don't know however. /barstool
Go!

So my dwarven paladin of Torag isnt allowed to be an orcish (meaning targeter of orcs) assassin, gosh :-)

101 to 150 of 168 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Profession: Assassin? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.