| 1 person marked this as FAQ candidate. |
Rage Powers: At 5th level, a wild stalker ranger gains a single rage power, as the barbarian class feature. He gains another rage power each five levels after 5th (to a maximum of four rage powers at 20th level). This ability replaces the ranger's second, third, fourth, and fifth favored enemy abilities.
Wild Talents (Ex): At 6th level, a wild stalker can either take a rage power, or gains a +2 insight bonus into any one of the following skills: Acrobatics, Climb, Perception, Stealth, Survival, or Swim. The wild stalker can gain one of these two benefits again every five levels after 6th (to a maximum of 4 times at 20th level). This ability replaces the ranger's second, third, fourth, and fifth favored enemy abilities.
Got 8 things here replacing 4 things. At different times. This quote is directly from the PRD.
Hi! Welcome to the wild and wooly world of reporting errata! It's a hobby that I enjoy very much, and so I hope that you will accept me as a tour guide, even though I'm no Strife2002 (but then who is).
If so, then I would like to direct you to the Ultimate Combat errata thread. (The navigation menu on the left of the PRD shows which book wild stalker is from.) Each RPG hardcover generally has a thread like that -- it's inevitable, given the size of those books -- and some other products do too, in their proper fora.
The reason for these threads is that... umm... well, this particular example is up to 549 posts. Some of those posts are replies to others, but not as many as you might think; unlike in the Rules Questions forum, debate is discouraged in errata threads, since that would degrade their usefulness for bringing FAQ candidates to the developers' attention.
Just imagine what it would do these messageboards if EVERY SINGLE ONE of those reports were in different threads. (Possibly even in more than one forum, like yours.) And that's just one book! So when you think you see an error, I earnestly request that you find the FAQ candidate thread (if it exists), and look to see if the typo or errata has already been reported.
In this case, you wouldn't even have to use the thread search function. It's right there in the second post, so all you have to do is hit the FAQ link and move on. The mysterious magic of the editing process will take care of the rest.
If you read this far, then thank you and good luck! :)
