Is masterwork sufficient to add magical qualities to an item?

[blackbloodtroll]

I am glad you have come to your senses. By your original logic, a simple casting of Magic Weapon meets the qualifications to be able to enchant a weapon with +1 abilities.

You are not a fool, or a trickster, but simply one who misunderstood some rules.

This requires no FAQ. It is a given.

[Grammar Nazi]

Pendin Fust wrote:

there are ALWAYS exceptions to absolutes

*dies from a feedback loop*

[Pendin Fust]

Grammar Nazi wrote:

Pendin Fust wrote:

there are ALWAYS exceptions to absolutes

*dies from a feedback loop*

That was just for you :)

[Heaven's Agent]

Pendin Fust wrote:

Jiggy's link. This is SKR's response to iteratively attacking with a single weapon (or fist) on FoB.

Thank you. Without knowing what was said as part of the discussion, the Search Box is almost useless for finding a specific post or thread.

[Buri]

blackbloodtroll wrote:

I am glad you have come to your senses. By your original logic, a simple casting of Magic Weapon meets the qualifications to be able to enchant a weapon with +1 abilities.

You are not a fool, or a trickster, but simply one who misunderstood some rules.

This requires no FAQ. It is a given.

I don't think that at all for reasons of developer quips by SKR where he and James went back and forth about qualifying for feats. Masterwork is a permanent quality. A spell effect is not permanent, unless it says so, of course. Now, if it's on the permanency list or a GM lets you put it there then maybe. If the text of Magic Weapon says no explicitly then it's no as well, obviously.