
Monkeygod |

Normally, I wouldn't do this, asking for somebody else to run a game for me. I'm in plenty of PbPs here, so I see the recruitment threads all the time.
However, I have this concept in mind, that I really want to try very badly, and while it could work in a normal game, would truly shine in a Gestalt.
Just so any prospective GMs aren't caught off guard, the concept is a Tiefling Rogue(or Ninja if allowed)/Inquisitor, with the Heretic archetype and Night subdomain.
Don't really care what level or setting. If I had my choice, I'd say around 3rd or so and in Golarion, but it doesn't really matter...

Nepherti |

This is weird, because I have an Aasimar Ranger/Paladin of Saranae. I could just take away the Ranger part of him and make him a Divine Hunter for a normal game, but he'd really work well as Gestalt. Don't know of he could handle being with your concept though...I could come up with something else. I love Gestalt, but having never done PbP before, I would want to play in it rather than run it.

Monkeygod |

I am well aware of the problems of a gestalt game, as I've played and run a few IRL.
The concept could work fine non gestalt, but I really want to explore it using gestalt rules.
@ Lynora, if u desire to run a gestalt game, I can wait a few weeks if that's what's needed.
I would hope that the group would not go overboard with trying to break the game and go all super munchkiny.

Doomed Hero |

In my experience Gestalt characters are really only about a +1 or +2 over normal CR. They're glass cannons. It's the increase in versatility that can make them challenging to run games for.
The real issue with them is that you can get a lot of party-role overlap, which is why they work best in games with smaller numbers.
That being said, I'd love to play a Wizard/Cleric necromancer. Would fit right in with Monkeygod's Tiefling Heretic :)

![]() |

I'd love to play a gestalt game. I love gestalt. And if Lyn was GMing, It'd be even better. Hi Lyn.
I'm not sure how I missed this, now that I think about it.
I'd have to really think about class combination, though. I've played several gestalt games (the most fun of which has been Avalon, Lyn), so I've got a little experience under my belt, but I don't even have a concept at this point. Maybe a Whip-based.... something. I dunno.

lynora |

Thanks for the recommendation, Edgar. ^.^
Anyhow, if I run another game, and it's currently a big if since I'm determining if I'm going to have enough time to devote to it, I would not want anyone to worry about stepping on anyone else's toes. I usually separate people into smaller groups within the bigger game for missions and if a group doesn't have something covered there will be resources available to help make up for the lack. Those resources might not always be desirable but they are available. :)
I'll be able to tell you guys for sure within the next day or so. I'm leaning towards doing it, but that depends on how much of the prep work for it I can get done this week.

lynora |

I'm also considering running a gestalt game.
I currently have a standard Carrion Crown going, and the only other AP I own is Jade Regent.
I have the new RotRL on order (through Amazon due to money issues) and that's actually what I was considering using once I have it.
That would be a good fit. RotRL gets a bit dicey for the players at times and they could use the extra boost from gestalt....or the GM who ran us through that was just being brutal, I'm not sure which. :)

Spiral_Ninja |

Spiral_Ninja wrote:I'm also considering running a gestalt game.
I currently have a standard Carrion Crown going, and the only other AP I own is Jade Regent.
I have the new RotRL on order (through Amazon due to money issues) and that's actually what I was considering using once I have it.
That would be a good fit. RotRL gets a bit dicey for the players at times and they could use the extra boost from gestalt....or the GM who ran us through that was just being brutal, I'm not sure which. :)
From all I've heard of it...why not both? ;)

Monkeygod |

As I said in my OP, if I had my say, lvl 3 would be my choice.
BUT, I am not running the game, just pestering people into giving me a chance to try out a concept that's become a slightly burning obsession with me.
Thus, I care not if we start at lvl 1. Id actually love to play RotRL. Been wanting to play that for a long time now. Was even a game, but it died very early. I just wonder if my sneaky, infiltrator type would fit in such a game.

lynora |

A gestalt RotRL? Run by Lyn?
So tempting to bring Ignatius Highhill, halfling Druid, back to life... but RL restrictions coming soon say no.
No, I'm not running RotRL. Already sold my books and everything. (Since when do I work off a script?)I'd be running a homebrew game. Someone else was thinking about RotRL. :)
Ninja'd by Eben. *waves*

Sayane Zelpher |

sign me up for both :)
again the idea is for a white-hair witch/monk of the lotus/Wall Climbing
also if both of you don't mind approving of this feat Spell Finesse pretty allows me to kill off some the MAD.

Spiral_Ninja |

Point buy is fairest, I feel. Probably 20 to allow for stats to fit the concept.
I usually allow 3 traits, the normal two plus the campaign trait.
As for combos...follow the normal rules for multiclassing. If you can't multiclass the parts, you can't gestalt them.
The only major alternate/house rule I insist on is that you must take at least one of the major 4 [BaB, Fort, Reflex, Will] from each class. Not really a problem as the best of them usually stays best all the way through.
As for avaliable classes...I'm very open. In our RL games we use Bo9S and Psionics (use Dreamscarred's versions). As long as I have a copy of the class I'm OK with it. If I don't have a copy or it's not on d20pfsrd I'll ask for a copy before I OK it.