Attempting to demonstrate evolution with a line.


Off-Topic Discussions


I find this fellow's argument to be very linear.

One would imagine he could think of other dimensions to
add to his line of reasoning.

.

> Attempting to demonstrate evolution with a line. <

.


For its target audience, it's actually a clever demonstration of the main point that the fellow is trying to convey.

Also, *Boom-tish* for your play upon words etc. :)

Much cheers to you and yours.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Intelligent design (ID) is the proposition that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." It is a form of creationism and a contemporary adaptation of the traditional teleological argument for the existence of God, presented by its advocates as "an evidence-based scientific theory about life's origins" rather than "a religious-based idea". The leading proponents of intelligent design are associated with the Discovery Institute, a politically conservative think tank, and believe the designer to be the Christian God. ~Wikipedia

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I got into a few arguments with a creationist on my campus. He pointed at a building and said "when you look at this building you assume it was created by a being with intelligence right?"

Me: Sure.

Him: "Okay - then why would you think differently when you look at something as complex as a human being?".

Me: Buildings do not reproduce.

Him: "What does that have to do with it?"

Me: Everything

Him: "Are you a scientist?"

Me: Yes.

He turns around and engages some students.

The following week he was back.

Him: "Did you know that evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics."

Me: Really? How so?

Him: "Well - it says that things tend toward disorder."

Me: Yes in a closed system.

Him: "err...right. So evolution leads to highly ordered lifeforms."

Me: sure.

Him: "So that violates the 2LOT."

Me: No that only applies to closed systems. If it didn't, you couldn't make ice cubes or babies. You can freeze ice in your freezer, lowering its entropy, because you are bringing in energy from somewhere else. The freezer isn't a closed system. We are just local negative entropy spikes in the increasing entropy curve of the universe. We are not closed systems, the Earth is not a closed system.

His Friend: "The Earth is closed."

Me: No. The Earth receives energy.

His Friend: "Okay..from where."

Me: The Sun.

Him: "Are you a homosexual?"

Me: What? What does that have to do with anything.

Him: "Just answer the question."

Me: \facepalm

Him: "Well?"

Me: No

Him: "I think you are."

Me: I am friends with a few folks who prefer men...is that what you are looking for? I could introduce you.

Him: Turns around and engages students.


Asphere wrote:


Him: "Are you a homosexual?"

Me: What? What does that have to do with anything.

Him: "Just answer the question."

Me: \facepalm

Him: "Well?"

Me: No

Him: "I think you are."

Me: I am friends with a few folks who prefer men...is that what you are looking for? I could introduce you.

Him: Turns around and engages students.

.

There is a lesson here:
Always attack your opponents sexuality. It is a tried and true attack method. It puts them permanently on the defensive.

Like the wiki-leaks guy found out.

.


Asphere wrote:
I got into a few arguments with a creationist on my campus.

Why bother?


Hudax wrote:
Asphere wrote:
I got into a few arguments with a creationist on my campus.
Why bother?

Nothing better to do?


I looked at the linked video, and kept seeing the word in the background as "BONG." It was too distracting for me to actually pay any attention to the people.

Shadow Lodge

Hudax wrote:
Asphere wrote:
I got into a few arguments with a creationist on my campus.
Why bother?

Not for his sake. I was bored. I learned my lesson.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I have absolute proof evolution is a lie! If evolution is true and the earth is 4.6 billion years old why is there no recorded history before 4000 BC. Obviously because there was no history! Researchers say 1 of the 7000 languages on earth disappear every 2 weeks. Clearly the mechanism that created these languages should still be working and the languages shouldnt disappear! Why is this happening? Humans went from writing on stones to computers in 4500 years, why then didn't humans invent computers 4.6 billion years ago?


Crocoducks!


Leafar the Lost wrote:

I have absolute proof evolution is a lie! If evolution is true and the earth is 4.6 billion years old why is there no recorded history before 4000 BC. Obviously because there was no history! Researchers say 1 of the 7000 languages on earth disappear every 2 weeks. Clearly the mechanism that created these languages should still be working and the languages shouldnt disappear! Why is this happening? Humans went from writing on stones to computers in 4500 years, why then didn't humans invent computers 4.6 billion years ago?

Plus, if evolution is true then why are there still monkeys??!

.


It's good to see that my Lord and Master is getting out more and visiting other threads.


Leafar the Lost wrote:

I have absolute proof evolution is a lie! If evolution is true and the earth is 4.6 billion years old why is there no recorded history before 4000 BC. Obviously because there was no history! Researchers say 1 of the 7000 languages on earth disappear every 2 weeks. Clearly the mechanism that created these languages should still be working and the languages shouldnt disappear! Why is this happening? Humans went from writing on stones to computers in 4500 years, why then didn't humans invent computers 4.6 billion years ago?

Cause we wouldn't let them.

Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / Attempting to demonstrate evolution with a line. All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.