Deep 6 FaWtL


Off-Topic Discussions

212,201 to 212,250 of 285,250 << first < prev | 4240 | 4241 | 4242 | 4243 | 4244 | 4245 | 4246 | 4247 | 4248 | 4249 | 4250 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.
baron arem heshvaun wrote:

I’m at the airport in Miami for Art Basel.

I was whistling to myself.

A sweet woman asked what the beautiful holiday tune I was doing.

I told her it was an old Germanic tune.

I didn’t have the heart to tell her it’s this song I was subconsciously whistling, I’m getting soft during the Holliday’s.

how do you subconsciously whistle these things?!?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

...

Uh...

You know what, I revoke that last question...

The Exchange

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Drejk wrote:
Drejk wrote:
Untouchable Fiery Beauty (Su)?
Look But Do Not Touch (Su)?

No touchie!

The Exchange

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Orthos wrote:
Jeez. Never before has "don't look at the comments" been more apt. The responses to that video are beyond disturbing.

If I were to post a video I think I would disable comments, save myself a lot of grief.

The Exchange

Vanykrye wrote:
Scintillae wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
Scintillae wrote:

Ugh.

The good news about reading a book about the Vietnam War is that the kids get more background on a really rough patch of history.

The bad news about reading a book about the Vietnam War is that it doesn't pull punches on how senseless and cruel war is. Ow.

I work with Vietnam vets regularly.

It was.

Book in question, if you were curious
Realistic depiction of war. Good. Show kids what war is really like and maybe as the generations churn we'll be in fewer of them. One can hope.

I think American culture is rather gung ho about wars.

Political:
Ahh this is not going to go well. But I'd like to ask does any nation have any right to interfere with another countries sovereignty by invading them?

On one hand, I don't think the talks with North Korea are getting many wheres.

And China is happily adding pieces of South East Asia to herself.

Again this could get political....


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Just a Mort wrote:
Vanykrye wrote:
Scintillae wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
Scintillae wrote:

Ugh.

The good news about reading a book about the Vietnam War is that the kids get more background on a really rough patch of history.

The bad news about reading a book about the Vietnam War is that it doesn't pull punches on how senseless and cruel war is. Ow.

I work with Vietnam vets regularly.

It was.

Book in question, if you were curious
Realistic depiction of war. Good. Show kids what war is really like and maybe as the generations churn we'll be in fewer of them. One can hope.

I think American culture is rather gung ho about wars.

** spoiler omitted **

You want to fight over that!


Just a Mort wrote:
Vanykrye wrote:


Realistic depiction of war. Good. Show kids what war is really like and maybe as the generations churn we'll be in fewer of them. One can hope.
I think American culture is rather gung ho about wars.

You're not wrong. It tends to be.

Just a Mort wrote:
But I'd like to ask does any nation have any right to interfere with another countries sovereignty by invading them?

A good question without good answers.

Dark Archive

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Freehold DM wrote:

...

Uh...

You know what, I revoke that last question...

It’s for the best.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Hi, Baron! Long time no see!


10 people marked this as a favorite.

So, more than any other single phenomenon of U.S. privileged culture (and it may extend to Western culture, or even worldwide culture), the concept that someone can be SO incompetent as to run a company/school district/congressional district into the ground in flaming, burning, spectacular fashion, alienating everyone they ever work with and abuse...

...and then move on to get offered another position doing the exact same thing at another company/school district/congressional district, typically for a raise, is beyond my comprehension.

Without going into excessive detail, the woman who personally drove GothBard's first company into the ground, alienated ALL of her employees in doing so, and other even worse things that I won't even go into...
...was about to get offered a senior position at GothBard's company.

I mean, seriously. WTF. She was the CEO of a company that went bankrupt. Could you, y'know, maybe call some of her former employees (there are only a couple of dozen) and ask them about her?


2 people marked this as a favorite.

O_o

Did GB get a chance to put in her 2cp?


5 people marked this as a favorite.

Okay, remember how I said this morning that I wanted to call in sick and lie on the couch with a pot of tea under a cozy afghan?

Well, I'm sick again. For the fourth time since school started. This time it waited four weeks instead of the usual three to hit me again. (Yes, I've been sick so often that I'm tracking it.)

So I dropped the kids off for their usual Thursday evening at Grandma's, slogged OVER AN HOUR to get home (twelve miles, but it's raining, so lots of accidents on the roads), made tea, climbed onto the couch under the seven-year afghan

seriously:
I was sick of couch afghans that only covered my shoulders OR my legs and feet but never both, so I came up with a pattern for a gorgeous synthetic mohair afghan in teal, navy, and purple. It's as thick and warm as a sweater, and it can comfortably cover two adults on a couch, or one adult and two small people. It took me seven years and I think thirteen skeins of yarn to knit (the first ten were a gift from an elderly resident of the elder care facility where I used to work who was unloading her stash, so I only had to buy three). Also, it can cover the top of a queen-size bed. Sometimes my projects go a bit overboard.
...
and discovered that the shady management company that owns our house is trying to cheat us out of the three days of motel stays from the recent electrical work, claiming that they had already credited us for it in August.
No, in fact, the credit in August was compensation for the fact that the house wasn't anything close to move-in ready and was, in fact, a stage setting for a minor scene in a modern film version of Dante's Purgatorio.
So I spent the evening on the couch under a cozy afghan with tea, working on financial projections from now through February.

And I CAN'T call in sick tomorrow because tomorrow I have to give parent-teacher conferences.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Clocking out. Good night, everyone. *Tags Vid in*


LM, I'm really sorry. I feel your pain.
Good night John, and good morning Vid!


Orthos wrote:
Tacs, I am morbidly curious about what conversation spawned your question(s) in Todd's thread. (And asking here seems less derailing than asking there.)

Uh... well... some people said that the Golarion/PF afterlife was intentionally designed as a "cosmic horror" (due to the idea that you "lose yourself" among other things) and I disagreed.

I pointed out that, within its own standards (with the caveat that it is less so when judged by most of what we prefer in real life; then again, see: everything), it's actually kind of okay. (Not the best, not the worst, just kind of okay.) This was not taken well.

After a series of back-and-forths, and a really long set of five (!) way-too-long posts on my part (that weren't the best, I gotta say), I abandoned the thread so as not to say something rude or callous.

I mean, if you really want, you can go through either my posting history or posts that others have favorited (that's probably shorter*) to find out more context about what the conversation was.

As I don't hold to the "it's intentionally cosmic horror" argument, it's hard for me to speak for other people.

(Clarification: I believe cosmic horror exists in the setting; I differentiate the setting from being "cosmic horror" in the same way that I suggest a dog is a poodle, but not all dogs are poodles. Though a poodle is kind of a cosmic horror on its own, so.)

* This is not the posts that I've favorited. Heaven help you if you try to sort through that page. No, I mean the posts I've made that other people have favorited.

The Exchange

1 person marked this as a favorite.
lisamarlene wrote:

Okay, remember how I said this morning that I wanted to call in sick and lie on the couch with a pot of tea under a cozy afghan?

Well, I'm sick again. For the fourth time since school started. This time it waited four weeks instead of the usual three to hit me again. (Yes, I've been sick so often that I'm tracking it.)

So I dropped the kids off for their usual Thursday evening at Grandma's, slogged OVER AN HOUR to get home (twelve miles, but it's raining, so lots of accidents on the roads), made tea, climbed onto the couch under the seven-year afghan ** spoiler omitted **...
and discovered that the shady management company that owns our house is trying to cheat us out of the three days of motel stays from the recent electrical work, claiming that they had already credited us for it in August.
No, in fact, the credit in August was compensation for the fact that the house wasn't anything close to move-in ready and was, in fact, a stage setting for a minor scene in a modern film version of Dante's Purgatorio.
So I spent the evening on the couch under a cozy afghan with tea, working on financial projections from now through February.

And I CAN'T call in sick tomorrow because tomorrow I have to give parent-teacher conferences.

Get well soon, LM, and winters a bad time for us all. I keep getting coughs and occasional sniffles myself.

The Exchange

Olde Timey Fisticuffs Yesterday wrote:
Just a Mort wrote:
Vanykrye wrote:
Scintillae wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
Scintillae wrote:

Ugh.

The good news about reading a book about the Vietnam War is that the kids get more background on a really rough patch of history.

The bad news about reading a book about the Vietnam War is that it doesn't pull punches on how senseless and cruel war is. Ow.

I work with Vietnam vets regularly.

It was.

Book in question, if you were curious
Realistic depiction of war. Good. Show kids what war is really like and maybe as the generations churn we'll be in fewer of them. One can hope.

I think American culture is rather gung ho about wars.

** spoiler omitted **

You want to fight over that!

See what I mean? ;)

*Maos and extends claws*


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Scintillae wrote:
Limeylongears wrote:
Scintillae wrote:

I hate getting stuck in the sunk-cost fallacy on a book. I've been ambivalent the whole time, but now I've only got 100 pages left and might as well...

But good lord are the Musketeers unlikable.

You're reading Dumas?
Yeah. I'm trying to make it a point to read more of the classics (job and all, should be familiar). I really liked The Count of Monte Cristo, but I just cannot make myself care about The Three Musketeers. They're just awful people.

I didn't find them unsympathetic, and I wasn't keen on 'The Count of Monte Cristo', which I found to be a little far-fetched and baroque.

Better sword-fights in 'The Three Musketeers' 'n' all.

LisaMarlene is right about 'The Phoenix Guards', though - it's a smasher.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
baron arem heshvaun wrote:

I’m at the airport in Miami for Art Basel.

I was whistling to myself.

A sweet woman asked what the beautiful holiday tune I was doing.

I told her it was an old Germanic tune.

I didn’t have the heart to tell her it’s this song I was subconsciously whistling, I’m getting soft during the Holliday’s.

Spoiler:

Oh, how I would love to produce a video for that song featuring footage of the Nuremberg trials/Normandy landings/surrender at Stalingrad/conquest of Berlin and so on.

The Exchange

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Three musketeers is fine. It's just a fine political mess and sometimes innocent people get caught in the crossfire. And it beats Romeo and Juliet any day.

Count of Monte Cristo, I didn't read.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

That's the point; politics=mess and innocent people *always* get caught in the crossfire.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I have to side with Scint, I found Count far more entertaining, while Musketeers was basically the story of four a@*!!~!s who for some reason we're supposed to root for.

Dark Archive

4 people marked this as a favorite.

Because it's Steve Martin, Chevy Chase, and Martin Short.

Who doesn't root for those guys!


5 people marked this as a favorite.

It's partly tone. Musketeers was, I believe, meant to be humorous. It fell flat. It fell especially so when you look at the protagonists vs. the antagonists.

Spoiler:
D'Artagnan starts picking idiotic fights from the first page he's introduced. He also effectively sexually assaults Lady de Winter with the whole "haha I seduced you while pretending to be your lover" thing. Athos is a useless emo drunk who, despite knowing he's s*@$ at it, keeps gambling away all his money and most of his friends'. Porthos regularly cons lonely housewives out of their savings. Aramis' holier-than-thou-I-want-to-be-a-priest-but-only-when-it's-convenient-for-me attitude is annoying as hell. And all of them casually kill people for stupid offenses of honor every other page.

So why is Lady de Winter so much worse? Because she wants revenge and kills people? Like the protagonists did? Because she lies to people to manipulate them? Like d'Artagnan and Porthos do for the entire novel? Because she's sleeping around? Like all of the Musketeers are?

Hell, at least Richelieu is presented with some sort of actual motivation.

Monte Cristo, by contrast, is set up as deliberately showing how empty vengeance is. You see the lengths to which he goes to, and there's some catharsis for the reader, but you do get to see just how much it's cost him to hold onto the grudge for so long. It delivers. We're not meant to see Monte Cristo as a hero as we are the Musketeers, so there isn't the mental disconnect. It's not trying to be funny, so it doesn't disappoint when the jokes don't land.

And it doesn't mistake a villain protagonist for a designated hero. I was never under the impression that I was supposed to like Monte Cristo. There's a vicarious thrill in watching him pull off his schemes, but he's more a force of nature than a character...

Spoiler:
until Mercedes calls him out.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

It was supposed to get down to -10 degrees this morning.

It's at least 10 degrees right now.

And I switched from shorts to pants for this.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Scintillae wrote:

It's partly tone. Musketeers was, I believe, meant to be humorous. It fell flat. It fell especially so when you look at the protagonists vs. the antagonists.

** spoiler omitted **

Monte Cristo, by contrast, is set up as deliberately showing how empty vengeance is. You see the lengths to which he goes to, and there's some catharsis for the reader, but you do get to see just how much it's cost him to hold onto the grudge for so long. It delivers. We're not meant to see Monte Cristo as a hero as we are the Musketeers, so there isn't the mental disconnect. It's not trying to be funny, so it doesn't disappoint when the jokes don't land.

And it doesn't mistake a villain protagonist for a designated hero. I was never under the impression that I was supposed to like Monte Cristo. There's a vicarious thrill in watching him pull off his schemes, but he's more a force of nature than a character...
** spoiler omitted **

H'mmm... I shall have to give them both a re-read...


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Pah. Vengeance is its own reward.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Limeylongears wrote:
Scintillae wrote:

It's partly tone. Musketeers was, I believe, meant to be humorous. It fell flat. It fell especially so when you look at the protagonists vs. the antagonists.

** spoiler omitted **

Monte Cristo, by contrast, is set up as deliberately showing how empty vengeance is. You see the lengths to which he goes to, and there's some catharsis for the reader, but you do get to see just how much it's cost him to hold onto the grudge for so long. It delivers. We're not meant to see Monte Cristo as a hero as we are the Musketeers, so there isn't the mental disconnect. It's not trying to be funny, so it doesn't disappoint when the jokes don't land.

And it doesn't mistake a villain protagonist for a designated hero. I was never under the impression that I was supposed to like Monte Cristo. There's a vicarious thrill in watching him pull off his schemes, but he's more a force of nature than a character...
** spoiler omitted **

H'mmm... I shall have to give them both a re-read...

YMMV. I'm not the same reader you are, so what fell apart for me could work for you, and vice-versa. I think Monte Cristo managed my expectations better than did Musketeers.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

It's been probably 15 years or more since I read Three Musketeers. I remember enjoying it. Never read Monte Cristo.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I had forgotten how difficult night shift work can be.

Also, found out my younger brother is in the hospital. Going to go see him tomorrow.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

My problem with The Count of Monte Cristo is that I can't even read the title of the book without that scene from Shawshank running merrily through my head...

"...by Alexandrey...Dumbass...Dumbass?"


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Icyshadow wrote:

I had forgotten how difficult night shift work can be.

Also, found out my younger brother is in the hospital. Going to go see him tomorrow.

Good luck to him. I hope he comes out soon.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Icyshadow!

Other peoples go to hibernate in the winter.

Fins wake up and show around...

Scarab Sages

2 people marked this as a favorite.
lisamarlene wrote:

Okay, remember how I said this morning that I wanted to call in sick and lie on the couch with a pot of tea under a cozy afghan?

Well, I'm sick again. For the fourth time since school started. This time it waited four weeks instead of the usual three to hit me again. (Yes, I've been sick so often that I'm tracking it.)

So I dropped the kids off for their usual Thursday evening at Grandma's, slogged OVER AN HOUR to get home (twelve miles, but it's raining, so lots of accidents on the roads), made tea, climbed onto the couch under the seven-year afghan ** spoiler omitted **...
and discovered that the shady management company that owns our house is trying to cheat us out of the three days of motel stays from the recent electrical work, claiming that they had already credited us for it in August.
No, in fact, the credit in August was compensation for the fact that the house wasn't anything close to move-in ready and was, in fact, a stage setting for a minor scene in a modern film version of Dante's Purgatorio.
So I spent the evening on the couch under a cozy afghan with tea, working on financial projections from now through February.

And I CAN'T call in sick tomorrow because tomorrow I have to give parent-teacher conferences.

I feel you. The flue has improved somewhat, but Im still not better yet.


Icyshadow wrote:

I had forgotten how difficult night shift work can be.

Also, found out my younger brother is in the hospital. Going to go see him tomorrow.

It's an Icy!

I'm sorry to hear about your brother! Hope he recovers quickly!


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Vanykrye wrote:

My problem with The Count of Monte Cristo is that I can't even read the title of the book without that scene from Shawshank running merrily through my head...

"...by Alexandrey...Dumbass...Dumbass?"

Vany gets cookies.


AM SKALD wrote:
Scintillae wrote:
Drejk wrote:
Drejk wrote:
Untouchable Fiery Beauty (Su)?
Look But Do Not Touch (Su)?
Hot? Damn!
Make a Dragon Wanna Retire, Man (Su)
Just a Mort wrote:
Drejk wrote:
Drejk wrote:
Untouchable Fiery Beauty (Su)?
Look But Do Not Touch (Su)?
No touchie!

You know, I'm really glad this went in this direction anyway. Wonderful, really.


9 people marked this as a favorite.

I also found out I passed all my exams rather swimmingly, so all I need to do is wrap up one last assignment, then just focus on work and writing.


WOO!


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Insert Requisite Tirade About Biking in Berkeley Here:
- Cars driving along in the well-marked dedicated bike lane? Check!
- Bikes ignoring the well-marked dedicated bike lane and driving in the dead center of the lane, blocking traffic? Check!
- Cars inappropriately yielding their own right-of-way to bicyclists, confusing everybody and jamming up intersections as a result? Check!

I even almost got door-clocked.

Whee!


6 people marked this as a favorite.

"What are the four parts of a business cycle?"
"Handlebars, pedals, wheels, and a basket for your briefcase."
pause, erasing "That ISN'T FUNNY, Ms. Scint."

Scarab Sages

1 person marked this as a favorite.
NobodysHome wrote:

Insert Requisite Tirade About Biking in Berkeley Here:

- Cars driving along in the well-marked dedicated bike lane? Check!
- Bikes ignoring the well-marked dedicated bike lane and driving in the dead center of the lane, blocking traffic? Check!
- Cars inappropriately yielding their own right-of-way to bicyclists, confusing everybody and jamming up intersections as a result? Check!

I even almost got door-clocked.

Whee!

Your bicycle anarchy is confusing.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

It's confusing for us too.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Woran wrote:
NobodysHome wrote:

Insert Requisite Tirade About Biking in Berkeley Here:

- Cars driving along in the well-marked dedicated bike lane? Check!
- Bikes ignoring the well-marked dedicated bike lane and driving in the dead center of the lane, blocking traffic? Check!
- Cars inappropriately yielding their own right-of-way to bicyclists, confusing everybody and jamming up intersections as a result? Check!

I even almost got door-clocked.

Whee!

Your bicycle anarchy is confusing.

Oh, I boil it down for the kids very simply: "If you interfere with the person with the right of way in any way, then you're a bad driver/bicyclist/pedestrian/jogger/whatever."

It's an amazingly simple test, and I'd say roughly 40% of California drivers fail even that simple of a test.

(And before you argue that it MUST be much higher, keep in mind all those drivers that you DON'T notice because they're actually driving or bicycling competently. Failure to notice things that aren't out of the ordinary is commonplace, and gives you a skewed perspective of just how bad things are.)


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Walking is my preferred method of transportation.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
NobodysHome wrote:
Woran wrote:
NobodysHome wrote:

Insert Requisite Tirade About Biking in Berkeley Here:

- Cars driving along in the well-marked dedicated bike lane? Check!
- Bikes ignoring the well-marked dedicated bike lane and driving in the dead center of the lane, blocking traffic? Check!
- Cars inappropriately yielding their own right-of-way to bicyclists, confusing everybody and jamming up intersections as a result? Check!

I even almost got door-clocked.

Whee!

Your bicycle anarchy is confusing.

Oh, I boil it down for the kids very simply: "If you interfere with the person with the right of way in any way, then you're a bad driver/bicyclist/pedestrian/jogger/whatever."

It's an amazingly simple test, and I'd say roughly 40% of California drivers fail even that simple of a test.

(And before you argue that it MUST be much higher, keep in mind all those drivers that you DON'T notice because they're actually driving or bicycling competently. Failure to notice things that aren't out of the ordinary is commonplace, and gives you a skewed perspective of just how bad things are.)

I disagree, I've driven through California from Eureka to San Diego and then back up north through Bakersfield, Sacramento and Mount Shasta.

I can't think of one competent driver or bicyclist I saw in California.

Present company excluded of course, you strike me as an incredibly competent driver or bicyclist.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Icyshadow wrote:

I had forgotten how difficult night shift work can be.

Also, found out my younger brother is in the hospital. Going to go see him tomorrow.

I hope that your brother feels better soon.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

At least you have infrastructure for bicyclists. I was amazed to see bike lanes and paths in Ohio, as Florida is among the worst in the nation for cyclists, and Jacksonville, where I lived 10 years, top 3 worst cities in tbe nation among multiple surveys.

I eagerly await spring to take my bike out and pedal on the regular again as I did early fall.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
NobodysHome wrote:

Insert Requisite Tirade About Biking in Berkeley Here:

- Cars driving along in the well-marked dedicated bike lane? Check!
- Bikes ignoring the well-marked dedicated bike lane and driving in the dead center of the lane, blocking traffic? Check!
- Cars inappropriately yielding their own right-of-way to bicyclists, confusing everybody and jamming up intersections as a result? Check!

I even almost got door-clocked.

Whee!

And who started it?


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Freehold DM wrote:
Pah. Vengeance is its own reward.

It really isn't. It never feels as good as your wronging felt bad. It never makes the pain go away.

I could give my gf a pair of pliers, a blowtorch, a knife, some salt, a car battery, and four days with her ex-husband tied up for her to torture, but it wouldn't make the PTSD from his abuse of her go away. She'd still wake up in the night crying with flashbacks and nightmares.

...and no amount of "but you got him back for it" would make the memories go away.

212,201 to 212,250 of 285,250 << first < prev | 4240 | 4241 | 4242 | 4243 | 4244 | 4245 | 4246 | 4247 | 4248 | 4249 | 4250 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / Deep 6 FaWtL All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.