My monster votes went to...

[Azmahel]

I'm pretty comfortable with what I see in the Top 32 , of my top 11 , 10 Monsters made it. The sole exception is the Tremagguan, but I did vote for it, so i couldn't have changed anything about it.
For now, I'm thrilled to see whats up next.

[Quandary]

Likewise, I was very glad to see almost all of my favorites continue on,
Unfortunately Sean McGowan's Rictus must have barely missed the cut somehow.

I really hope most everybody just sticks with statting up their own monster, even though they don't have to. Alot of criticisms of the concepts seemed focused on suppositions of how the stat-block would look like, so I want to see how the authors themselves would pull them off.

[Nicolas Quimby]

Jason Rice wrote:

Wow, pretty close to the actual vote results. 15 of the 16 "projected" winners advanced.

Yea. I was the only one that didn't (projected position: 8th of 32. Actual position:... less than that).

And now that I'm done pouting, it's very easy for me to see how the liesinger would be disproportionately favored by the forum regulars and hardcore RPGSS fans (as opposed to the casual readers who make up the bulk of the voting pool). It was pretty out there.

[Nicolas Quimby]

Quandary wrote:

Likewise, I was very glad to see almost all of my favorites continue on,

Unfortunately Sean McGowan's Rictus must have barely missed the cut somehow.

I really hope most everybody just sticks with statting up their own monster, even though they don't have to. Alot of criticisms of the concepts seemed focused on suppositions of how the stat-block would look like, so I want to see how the authors themselves would pull them off.

Same here, and I intend to eventually.

[John Spalding]

The exit poll was very accurate. Fifteen of the creatures predicted to be in the top 16 were.

[Benjamin Bruck]

Quandary wrote:

Likewise, I was very glad to see almost all of my favorites continue on,

Unfortunately Sean McGowan's Rictus must have barely missed the cut somehow.

I really hope most everybody just sticks with statting up their own monster, even though they don't have to. Alot of criticisms of the concepts seemed focused on suppositions of how the stat-block would look like, so I want to see how the authors themselves would pull them off.

We have to pick someone else's monster though, we aren't allowed to do our own.

[Vic Wertz]

Quandary wrote:

Likewise, I was very glad to see almost all of my favorites continue on,

Unfortunately Sean McGowan's Rictus must have barely missed the cut somehow.

I really hope most everybody just sticks with statting up their own monster, even though they don't have to. Alot of criticisms of the concepts seemed focused on suppositions of how the stat-block would look like, so I want to see how the authors themselves would pull them off.

I think you misread the round rules. Contestants must select one of the other 15 advancing monsters; they may not select their own.

[Vic Wertz]

John Spalding wrote:

The exit poll was very accurate. Fifteen of the creatures predicted to be in the top 16 were.

Again, from behind the scenes, it did a good job predicting the top 16, but if the cutoff had been at another number, it wouldn't look quite so accurate to you. :-)

[roguerouge]

Tease.

[Matt Goodall]

A big thank you to everyone who gave me their vote.

Thanks taig, The Harbinger, Dredan, Mr. Slaad, Demiurge 1138, Illessa, Ninjaiguana, Celeador, varianor, Meds and everyone else who voted.

I will do my best in the coming rounds.