Dwarven Defender (a.k.a Bulwark)


Homebrew and House Rules

Scarab Sages

I started this prestige class as a conversion, but my updates quickly evolved into a different enough class to land it in the homebrew section.

Any comments or questions (especially from people willing to playtest it!) welcome.


"target takes damage equal to the bulwark's Strength modifier" should be 'strength bonus (if any)' or the like. I can't imagine somebody playing this with a low str, but its the general way those are done.

I'd take armor training off the list, between that, the pre existing fighter bonuses, insight, and the defender bonus, it would get pretty nuts.

Scarab Sages

Hey thanks for checking it out!

Requia wrote:
"target takes damage equal to the bulwark's Strength modifier" should be 'strength bonus (if any)' or the like. I can't imagine somebody playing this with a low str, but its the general way those are done.

Hey look at that. That's the exact wording from the barbarian, so blame Jason. :)

Requia wrote:


I'd take armor training off the list, between that, the pre existing fighter bonuses, insight, and the defender bonus, it would get pretty nuts.

I'm confused, can you elaborate on this? (Armor training doesn't effect AC anymore, yeah?)


1. Why not follow the normal prestige class saving throw advancement? You seem to have given them all good saves, with an additional +1 bonus on all saves that's coming from... where? And that's without the free bonuses just for standing in one place.

2. With no rounds limit, I can pick Refocus at 2nd level and just claim I'm using that whenever I'm moving... then the stance is "always active" for every other round, all day, forever?

3. And then I grab a combat feat or armor training at 3rd. Which means that pretty much ALL fighters will want to make a 3- or 4-level dip into this class -- they lose pretty much nothing, and gain mad saving throw bonuses, d12 HD, a big AC bonus, and an at-will +4 bonus to Str and Con (plus more save bonuses and AC bonuses!).

4. Making it dwarf-only just means that people will ask why all dwarven fighters are so much better than all non-dwarven fighters...

Scarab Sages

Kirth Gersen wrote:
1. Why not follow the normal prestige class saving throw advancement?

I felt like the class (being the definition of "defensive") should have good saves all around. Though I like that idea, I'm not in love with it, and should other elements of the class prove too much, this will be the first thing I cut back on.

Kirth Gersen wrote:
2. With no rounds limit, I can pick Refocus at 2nd level and just claim I'm using it whenever I'm moving... then the stance is "always active" for every other round, all day, forever?

Three things: First, the earliest you'll be able to select refocus is 3rd level bulwark (it has a prerequisite). Second, even at 10th level bulwark you can only use refocus 5 rounds per day. That's probably about the length of one fight. Third, yes, he can use defensive stance "forever." But aside from a 5-foot step and the possible 5 rounds from refocus, he can't move. Circumstance will certainly dictate that he must move, eventually.

Regarding movement in general, it is my opinion that this was the greatest shortcoming in the original dwarven defender, the inability to move without ending his defensive stance. Refocus exists to address that shortcoming, and it's limited enough that I think it does its job without upsetting that ethereal thing we call balance.

Scarab Sages

Kirth Gersen wrote:
3. And then I grab a combat feat or armor training at 3rd. Which means that pretty much ALL fighters will want to make a 3- or 4-level dip into this class -- they lose pretty much nothing, and gain mad saving throw bonuses, d12 HD, a big AC bonus, and an at-will +4 bonus to Str and Con (plus more save bonuses and AC bonuses!).

Now that's something. Fighters who dip for the AC boost would loose the fighter capstone(s), but if they're willing to give up the ability to move to do it... dunno, maybe ok, maybe not.


Kirth Gersen wrote:


4. Making it dwarf-only just means that people will ask why all dwarven fighters are so much better than all non-dwarven fighters...

Because back in my day Fighter was the dwarf favored class and dammit all if I let Pathfinder make more diversity among PC Fighters!!! ;-)


Delete is fail.


Tom Baumbach wrote:
I'm confused, can you elaborate on this? (Armor training doesn't effect AC anymore, yeah?)

Armor training raises the max dex of your armor.


Tom Baumbach wrote:
Fighters who dip for the AC boost would loose the fighter capstone(s)

I've never played a single-classed character to 20th level, ever. The capstone abilities look good on paper, but 99% of the time they have no bearing on actual game play. Starting 8th level with +2 to all your saves, better HD, big AC bonuses, and at-will bonuses to saves and Str and Con... and losing nothing at that level... that's a MUCH better deal than any capstone, hands-down.

Let me put it this way: if I used it as written in a standard Pathfinder campaign, 100% of all PC fighters would be lawful dwarves, and all of them would become bulwarks at 8th level. Every single one of them.


Tom Baumbach wrote:
Third, yes, he can use defensive stance "forever." But aside from a 5-foot step and the possible 5 rounds from refocus, he can't move. Circumstance will certainly dictate that he must move, eventually.

Right, but since it's at will as a free acrion, he doesn't even need the trick I outlined. All he needs is a cleric cohort with a wand of lesser restoration to get rid of that pesky fatigue. There's no way I wouldn't do that!

Scarab Sages

You do realize that at 8th level, they won't be able to move but 5-ft. while gaining all those bonuses, right?

I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying you've yet to convince me I need to make a change, because the restriction to movement is pretty severe.

EDIT: see next post, now I'm convinced!

Scarab Sages

Kirth Gersen wrote:
Right, but since it's at will as a free acrion, he doesn't even need the trick I outlined. All he needs is a cleric cohort with a wand of lesser restoration to get rid of that pesky fatigue. There's no way I wouldn't do that!

Ah-ha, now we're on to something. This is a great reason to impose a rounds-per-day limit on defensive stance.


Even if I hardly ever used (or even if I never used) the defensive stance, I'd still take it every time. All good saves (with the additional phantom +1 boost you provided on top of that; good PrC saves normally start at +1), plus d12 HD and a +1 bonus to AC that'll stack with pretty much everything I have, are worth more than 1 feat to me.

Then again, that just means that the fighter still sucks, not that there's anything wrong with your bulwark!

Scarab Sages

Kirth Gersen wrote:
(with the additional phantom +1 boost you provided on top of that; good PrC saves normally start at +1)

Ohhhhhh that's what you meant. Yeah that's a mistake, I forgot about the PF change to prestige class saves. (See, the original Dwarven Defender had good Fortitude and Will, but bad Reflex, so I thought that's what you were talking about.)


Well, I say, I'd love to see this posted on the Pathfinder Database.


Pathfinder Database Pimp wrote:
Well, I say, I'd love to see this posted on the Pathfinder Database.

The Database would be a lot more useful if there were discussion following each entry, so that obvious bugs could be pointed out by readers and hopefully corrected by the original poster. The way it is now, a lot of things are almost ready at one end, ranging to slightly flawed, to poorly balanced, to not balanced at all, to just plain bad at the other end. Almost all game materials need playtesting and feedback; they don't appear off the pen ready for use.

Scarab Sages

Kirth Gersen wrote:
Almost all game materials need playtesting and feedback; they don't appear off the pen ready for use.

Well said sir. (Or madam, as you prefer.)


Tom Baumbach wrote:
Kirth Gersen wrote:
Almost all game materials need playtesting and feedback; they don't appear off the pen ready for use.
Well said sir. (Or madam, as you prefer.)

Oh, I'm not sure you want to know what he prefers ;)

(But he does raise a valid point. Alot of the stuff on the database could use commentary. I'd submit stuff myself, but the only stuff I could submit that wouldn't be publicly considerred overpowered is caster material, new spells and such, and even that might fail since I tend to favor 3.5/3.0 magic)

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Homebrew and House Rules / Dwarven Defender (a.k.a Bulwark) All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Homebrew and House Rules