Plate plus Shield = AC 2


Gamer Life General Discussion

1 to 50 of 90 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

Grrrr ....

So last night I was thinking about the equipment for an NPC villain I'm currently statting up. He'll wear half-plate, so I thought:

Full plate plus a shield is AC 2, so full plate is AC 3, so half-plate would be AC 4. Is that right? Wait a minute, we're playing 3.5 and AC goes up, not down.

I'm not sure whether I felt old or nostalgic or just foolish.

Either way, thought I'd share.

R.

Scarab Sages

Sounds like you had a grognard moment...

Liberty's Edge

Its okay. We all feel like we need to beat our head against the wall sometimes. Just make sure to not leave a dent or a hole. Flesh heals in time, redoing a wall is a lot of work though.


Studpuffin wrote:
Just make sure to not leave a dent or a hole. Flesh heals in time, redoing a wall is a lot of work though.

Plus the landlord takes it out of your deposit :-O


At least your lapse didn't go long enough for you to start calculating his THAC0...

Dark Archive

Actually Half-plate, as written in 3.5 and PFRPG is the old 2nd ed Plate Mail (base AC3). Same cost, same weight. 600 GP, and 50lbs.

So Half Plate + Shield is AC 2
Field plate + shield is AC 1
Full plate + shield is AC 0 plus old school DR
I use some old stats as comparison when making old material conversions.


Shadowborn wrote:
At least your lapse didn't go long enough for you to start calculating his THAC0...

Never would have ... I was in full 1st Edition mindset. PHB, UA and all.


Shadowborn wrote:
At least your lapse didn't go long enough for you to start calculating his THAC0...

I actually was statting up and NPC a few days ago and got so mixed up. I was trying to think what a Ftr 10/Mnk 10's thac0 would be.

Then I was like, wait....... there's no Fighter/Monk multi-class in second edition........


Rezdave wrote:
Shadowborn wrote:
At least your lapse didn't go long enough for you to start calculating his THAC0...
Never would have ... I was in full 1st Edition mindset. PHB, UA and all.

What did you roll for his Comeliness score?


ChrisRevocateur wrote:
Shadowborn wrote:
At least your lapse didn't go long enough for you to start calculating his THAC0...

I actually was statting up and NPC a few days ago and got so mixed up. I was trying to think what a Ftr 10/Mnk 10's thac0 would be.

Then I was like, wait....... there's no Fighter/Monk multi-class in second edition........

I've got a player that just recently rejoined our group. She's playing a rogue, and keeps using the term "backstab" instead of "sneak attack." I'm still not sure why, since we were in 3.5 when she stopped playing.

Maybe this is an actual condition gamers suffer from. We need a name for it. Edition Relapse? Game Mechanic Memory Disorder?


The ironic thing about these nostalgic moments is that it was much easier to create a workable adversary in less than 5 minutes statwise. This kind of simplicity is something I sometimes wish to go back to.


Shadowborn wrote:
She ... keeps using the term "backstab" instead of "sneak attack."

My group had an 18yo join a couple years ago. He always understood what we meant but wasn't sure where the terms came from (Fighter/Magic-User instead of Fighter/Wizard or potion of extra-healing or whatever).

We clued him into the fact that these "old edition" terms were basically code-words for us old-timers. Sort of like a secret handshake we could use to identify one another. That way when you come into a new group you know who deserves your respect and who's a "noob" regardless of their age, stats or build.

R.


Shadowborn wrote:


I've got a player that just recently rejoined our group. She's playing a rogue, and keeps using the term "backstab" instead of "sneak attack." I'm still not sure why, since we were in 3.5 when she stopped playing.

Maybe this is an actual condition gamers suffer from. We need a name for it. Edition Relapse? Game Mechanic Memory Disorder?

I STILL do that. Never got the hang of calling it sneak attack.

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I dunno about that. I have Players ask me about Backstab and thac0 all the time because they cut their teeth on the Baldur's Gate video games. So maybe the code isn't as tight as you'd think lol.

(It was Baldur's Gate where I first learned about D&D, but I learned to play Pen and Paper with 3.0 way back when, saved for 3 months for those rulebooks).


I've been reminicing about 1st and 2nd ed recently, telling my friend about my characters and how things used to be different. He was astonished that there were race/class restrictions, and that demihumans could only reach a certain level.

He still doesn't understand Thac0.

Scarab Sages

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber

My problem is ability scores. 9 times out of 10 I'll write them down in this order:

STR
INT
WIS
DEX
CON
CHA

Mike


Mijast727 wrote:

My problem is ability scores. 9 times out of 10 I'll write them down in this order:

STR
INT
WIS
DEX
CON
CHA

Mike

I still do that all the time too, heck I caught myself rolling exceptional strength for a guy the other night and stopped, not because I realized I was creating stats first ed style, but because I recalled thieves don't get exceptional strength....

Grand Lodge

I miss THAC0 *sniff sniff* I had HOPED PFRPG would go back to THAC0 but I knew there was no way... *sniff sniff*


Krome wrote:
I miss THAC0

THAC0 didn't go away ... he became a monk.

Grand Lodge

Rezdave wrote:
Krome wrote:
I miss THAC0
THAC0 didn't go away ... he became a monk.

lol that was hilarious!


Mijast727 wrote:

My problem is ability scores. 9 times out of 10 I'll write them down in this order:

STR
INT
WIS
DEX
CON
CHA

Mike

I downloaded a 3.5 sheet a few days ago from The Mad Irishman. It was made to look like the old school 1st edition sheets, including the ability score order. I showed it to that same player that was astonished at race/class restrictions and racial max levels, as well as the same player that doesn't understand Thac0, and he (again) was like "WHAA?!"

This thread SO makes me wanna play a 1st edition game again!


My Rogues still "Back Stab"

Liberty's Edge

Rezdave wrote:
Shadowborn wrote:
At least your lapse didn't go long enough for you to start calculating his THAC0...
Never would have ... I was in full 1st Edition mindset. PHB, UA and all.

UA was ~1.5e and the beginning of the production of crap. Why would you mention it in the same sentence as the true master work of the 1e PHB?

Dissapointed in you...

S.

PS: THAC0 was 2e, the glorious Gygax in his trilogy of perfection mentioned it not.


Stefan Hill wrote:
PS: THAC0 was 2e, the glorious Gygax in his trilogy of perfection mentioned it not.

THAC0 was listed in the first edition DMG.


Bill Lumberg wrote:
Stefan Hill wrote:
PS: THAC0 was 2e, the glorious Gygax in his trilogy of perfection mentioned it not.
THAC0 was listed in the first edition DMG.

Nope. Those were "To Hit" tables. It wasn't based around Armor Class 0, it was just a huge set of tables.

Ended up working pretty much the same, but not actually the same thing.

Liberty's Edge

Bill Lumberg wrote:
Stefan Hill wrote:
PS: THAC0 was 2e, the glorious Gygax in his trilogy of perfection mentioned it not.
THAC0 was listed in the first edition DMG.

What Chris said... THAC0 was "Zebs" baby

Scarab Sages

I think he means in the monster appendix of the DMG.
It's also in the monster stats of 1E scenarios. Not all, but some.
Off-hand I know the UK series used it (The Sentinel, The Gauntlet, etc,) and the statblocks in Imagine magazine (TSR UK), so 1982/83 onwards?

Liberty's Edge

Bill Lumberg wrote:
Stefan Hill wrote:
PS: THAC0 was 2e, the glorious Gygax in his trilogy of perfection mentioned it not.
THAC0 was listed in the first edition DMG.

Apologies, you are completely correct. I had a quick hunt, does he ever explain what they are?

S.


ChrisRevocateur wrote:
Bill Lumberg wrote:
THAC0 was listed in the first edition DMG.

Nope. Those were "To Hit" tables. It wasn't based around Armor Class 0, it was just a huge set of tables.

Ended up working pretty much the same, but not actually the same thing.

Except that the master To Hit Tables given in the DM Screen did not consistently follow the proper mathematical progression. I actually recomputed and recreated them on a manual typewriter as a kid for my group so that each class had a standard progress that ended up mirroring the current Excellent, Good, Poor BAB progression.

Rez

P.S. I can't believe this thread got so long.

Grand Lodge

*sits down by the fire* Tell me another story Granpa! XD

Silver Crusade

THAC0 wasn't present as a term in the 1E DMG, but the concept was there. You'll find it in Appendix E: Alphabetical Monster Listing. There is a column for "To hit A.C. 0".


I still play a MU....

Dark Archive

Ahhh back in the days of yore when you could be an Assassin at level 1, when the Bard was THE prestidge class, when the Druid had the potential for most spells at first level !

It was the time we played mods that were penned by a man named Gygax and we lost arms to a demon's mouth, when Slavers gave way to Giants who in turn were led by dark skinned elves who we Loath to this day. And the only 'masterwork' items to be found were the games we played or the nickname for the pizza we ordered.

1st Ed was when, armed with your 3-18 damage (L) dealing two handed sword you could count on Magic Users named Bigby on lending you a (Crushing) Hand just as you knew his casting Haste would age you a year, but you needed it to take on the toughest Red Dragon that came charging in with 88 hit points !

Luvin this thread !


Orcs looked piggy...
Dwarves had Antipathy for Elves...
Weapon Speeds...
15 Dice Fireballs...
Save v Death...
18:00 Strength...
The only magical leather was +1...

Dark Archive

Spacelard wrote:
15 Dice Fireballs...

30 Dice Fireballs even !!

That's what the Witch King in 'Throne of Bloodstone' was packing.

Even in the early Drow series there was a Lich that packed 20 die fireballs just 'hanging out'.

Don't forget the Magic Missles !

A level 17 MU could slam you with 9 missles !!

Bonus points if you remember which demon lord had Magic Missles that did 2-8 damage each !


baron arem heshvaun wrote:
Spacelard wrote:
15 Dice Fireballs...

30 Dice Fireballs even !!

That's what the Witch King in 'Throne of Bloodstone' was packing.

Even in the early Drow series there was a Lich that packed 20 die fireballs just 'hanging out'.

Don't forget the Magic Missles !

A level 17 MU could slam you with 9 missles !!

Bonus points if you remember which demon lord had Magic Missles that did 2-8 damage each !

Hmmm...There weren't that many...Guessing...Jubilix!

Probably to oozey...


I ran a Star Wars campaign with 1e. If Clerics do not scream Jedi, I do not know what does.


Spacelard wrote:
baron arem heshvaun wrote:
Spacelard wrote:
15 Dice Fireballs...
Bonus points if you remember which demon lord had Magic Missles that did 2-8 damage each !

Hmmm...There weren't that many...Guessing...Jubilix!

Probably to oozey...

Yenouguh or whatever!

I had to dig out my old MM for that!

Dark Archive

CourtFool wrote:
I ran a Star Wars campaign with 1e. If Clerics do not scream Jedi, I do not know what does.

Really ? I was thinking Paladin myself.

Spacelard wrote:

Yenouguh or whatever!

I had to dig out my old MM for that!

Yeenoghu FTW.

I was hoping somebody would remember from memory.

Nice research work though : )


baron arem heshvaun wrote:
Really ? I was thinking Paladin myself.

What's a Paladin?


Mijast727 wrote:

My problem is ability scores. 9 times out of 10 I'll write them down in this order:

STR
INT
WIS
DEX
CON
CHA

Mike

I still do that all the time.

Dark Archive

CourtFool wrote:
What's a Paladin?

This may help.


I am confusing Basic/Expert with 1e.


Once upon a time, all poison was save or die...well, except for drow poison, but that was so they could put you to sleep and drag you home to put on Lolth's altar. (Oh, and giant centipede poison, which just weakened you.)


I was talking with one of my players yesterday, and discussing a recent wizard opponent they had bested. I kept calling him a mage, and after about 5 minutes, my player stopped me and was like "So, was Mage his name or something?"

The worst part is I didn't get why he was asking that question, it just seemed common sense to me.

After I explained that a mage is a "universalist wizard" he got this "umm.... okay......" look on his face. I really need to get a 2nd ed PHB, just so I can show him.


I played one 2E game before the 3E launch the next week, when we all bought a PHB and the rest is history. I haven't had the inclination to try and find out why it was never attack bonus in the first place.

1 to 50 of 90 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / General Discussion / Plate plus Shield = AC 2 All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.