
Lord Fyre RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32 |

Because, someone posted ...
We're gamers, we shouldn't be talking politics. We should be talking hot chicks that none of us have a chance to get dates with.
It must be said. He is completely missing something ...
Gamer Chicks are the Hawtness!!
You may now return to your regularly scheduled Flame War. :D

Emperor7 |

Emperor7 wrote:Not back when I ran GURPS. It was about half and half.David Fryer wrote:That is the reason I used to have a house rule that if you wanted to take advantage of the bulletproof nudity rule in GURPS, you had to act it out. ;-)Scary. Your group was all guys, wasn't it?
Half skins and half shirts?

![]() |

CourtFool wrote:Emperor7 wrote:Your group was all guys, wasn't it?Emperor7 has just sprouted wood.Don't project your poodle fantasies on me. ;)
We trees simply cast our seeds to the winds and let them fall where they may.
I had a foster brother who did that. He had 12 kids by seven women.

Emperor7 |

Emperor7 wrote:I had a foster brother who did that. He had 12 kids by seven women.CourtFool wrote:Emperor7 wrote:Your group was all guys, wasn't it?Emperor7 has just sprouted wood.Don't project your poodle fantasies on me. ;)
We trees simply cast our seeds to the winds and let them fall where they may.
What an Ash! ;)

Lord Fyre RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32 |

Woah. I just knew there would be a good reason to browse the messageboards this morning. Thanks, Fyre. Best thread of the day...possibly even the entire week.
You should check out the thread that started this: The Rosetta Stone Chick

![]() |

![]() |

Crimson Jester wrote:Gamer chicks are Hott!!!!! They love chain mail Bikinis.....Unless they wear dungarees...then well sigh.I take it you go to a lot of conventions? Because, yes some of the costumes that the gamer chicks wear there are truely smoking HOT! :D
Sweet that first one is totally a City of Heroes costume!! that rocks!!!!

GentleGiant |

Dreamweaver wrote:Thats what I thought when the pic loaded. *shudder*Garydee wrote:I was thinking the one under 'this'.Tarren Dei wrote:Are you talking about the devil one(under MUST)? That does look like a guy.Lord Fyre wrote:One of those is a guy, right?
... Must keep this thread alive!
It clearly is a woman (which a closer inspection of the picture would quickly show). Especially when you see the next couple of pictures:
ThisThis
This
This
and this
Also, her in another outfit.
This one, however, is a guy... I think...
And boy oh boy, those females sure do come in different sizes. Like these two women!

![]() |

And boy oh boy, those females sure do come in different sizes. Like these two women!
Oh yeah! Can't get enough pictures of amazon women! Of course, I may be a tad biased, being one :)

Garydee |

Erik Mona wrote:Boy, this thread is just jam-packed with evidence to the contrary of the thread title, I'm sorry to say.
Hush You!
Have you also noticed that there has not been an agreement on which of those women would be "contrary of the thread title"?
Well, we guys have varied tastes. What can I say?

![]() |

Duck with a +1 Poodle Slayer wrote:Dreamweaver wrote:Thats what I thought when the pic loaded. *shudder*Garydee wrote:I was thinking the one under 'this'.Tarren Dei wrote:Are you talking about the devil one(under MUST)? That does look like a guy.Lord Fyre wrote:One of those is a guy, right?
... Must keep this thread alive!It clearly is a woman (which a closer inspection of the picture would quickly show). Especially when you see the next couple of pictures:
This
This
This
This
and this
Also, her in another outfit.This one, however, is a guy... I think...
And boy oh boy, those females sure do come in different sizes. Like these two women!
Hehehe. My own attempt at April 1st folly. ;-)

![]() |

This is the best that Dreamweaver and I could do, sorry no flesh for your flesh hungry goblins out there.

GentleGiant |

GentleGiant wrote:Oh yeah! Can't get enough pictures of amazon women! Of course, I may be a tad biased, being one :)
And boy oh boy, those females sure do come in different sizes. Like these two women!
Now, you know such a statement can't go alone without some kind of photographic evidence to back it up! ;-)
(Mmmmm, amazon women :-D)
![]() |

GentleGiant wrote:Hehehe. My own attempt at April 1st folly. ;-)Duck with a +1 Poodle Slayer wrote:Dreamweaver wrote:Thats what I thought when the pic loaded. *shudder*Garydee wrote:I was thinking the one under 'this'.Tarren Dei wrote:Are you talking about the devil one(under MUST)? That does look like a guy.Lord Fyre wrote:One of those is a guy, right?
... Must keep this thread alive!It clearly is a woman (which a closer inspection of the picture would quickly show). Especially when you see the next couple of pictures:
This
This
This
This
and this
Also, her in another outfit.This one, however, is a guy... I think...
And boy oh boy, those females sure do come in different sizes. Like these two women!
Salute! You got me!!! I spent 10 minutes wondering if I needed to recalibrate the radar.