One of the earliest oddities I found in D&D was that a dagger thrown by a pixie has the same range increment and maximum range as a dagger thrown by a titan.
Should range increments and/or maximum ranges for projectile and thrown weapons be modified by wielder's size?
Maybe another invisible pixie is "propelling" the dagger along?
but indeed, it seems a bit odd that a Titan already looses accuracy after a distance about the length of its forearms...
as a quick rule, the range increment could be assumed for creature of 5ft reach, and adjusted proportionally for larger and smaller creatures.
Example.
2.5 ft. reach = 1/2 weapon's range increment
10 ft. reach = x2 weapon's range increment
15 ft. reach = x3 weapon's range increment
0 ft. reach = ... this is where my logic fails...
'findel
Maybe another invisible pixie is "propelling" the dagger along?
It isn't a pixie propelling it along, and the pixie never even throws the dagger. He/She hands it off in an elaborately disguised motion to an invisible (albeit endangered) Quickling who then runs the dagger at 90 foot a second with a charge!
Those clever fairy folk!