George Lucas and the power of mystery


Movies


Reply or not, this is just an observation I had and I wanted to put it out there. I was originally writing this in the "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" thread, but I got a little off topic, so I wanted to put it here.

As much as I might frown at the last three Star Wars movies, I can't help but admire the imagination of George Lucas. His imagination has spawned some wonderful stories and characters. And before you go on some Joseph Campbell diatribe on me, yes, I know he picked over the entire history of eastern and western myths to create his worlds, whatever - just hear me out. From Star Wars to Indiana Jones to Willow; the fruits of his imagination are impressive. Few filmmakers can claim to have created an entire world like Lucas has. And he has done it twice.

But I got a little itch on the GM part of my brain when I watched the last Indiana Jones movie. Although I can't boast to be as creative (or at least as successful) as George Lucas, I do take exception to a quality that I've noticed in his storytelling. He seems to have decided (in his later years at least) that its better to reveal a secret than to let your audience live with the mystery.

The latest example was the warehouse at the beginning of KOTCS. I'm willing to bet that when Lucas first wrote out Raiders he did not specify that the warehouse that held the Ark of the Covenant at the end was Area 51. He didn't have to. It wasn't integral to the story at all. But what Lucas couldn't have imagined, was that the short scene involving the warehouse would become a flash point for interest in the movie. It was a cool and mysterious place. People who saw Raiders couldn't help but wonder if such a place really existed somewhere in the dark corners of the United States. It was essentially a tiny little detail of the movie that had a greater life in the imaginations of its audience. It was a delicious mystery. But in the most recent Indiana Jones film, Lucas chooses to reveal the secret. The curtain is pulled back and voila! Area 51.

Another example of this is Boba Fett from The Empire Strikes Back. I don't think that Lucas had any idea that this character was going to become such a fan favorite. Although he plays a big part, he doesn't say much and he doesn't have much screen time. But he ignited people's imaginations for exactly those reasons, he was incredibly mysterious. Boba Fett was a badass and we didn't know much about him. He could've been anyone. He could've even been a she! Who knows? No one! And thats what made him cool. Yet Lucas, decided to pull back the curtain in Episode II, and gave us a whole history of Boba Fett, and in my mind this spoiled his mystery.

A last example is what I believe to be the single greatest mistake of the Star Wars prequels, explaining the force in scientific terms. When Lucas uses Qui-Gon to explain that the force is somehow related to a micro-organism in the blood stream, it plucks out the heart of the Star Wars mystery. Its literally the magician revealing to you that his tricks aren't really magic after all. What was cool about "the Force" was that is was unknowable. It was magic and you had to take that on faith. It was a mystery.

But Lucas seems all too willing these days to explain away his mysteries. And as an amateur storyteller myself, I can sympathize. I'm sure its very tempting. When you discover that your audience is engaged by something (especially something you didn't intend) you want to keep their interest alive. You want them to keep turning the page, hanging on your words, staring rapt at the movie screen, etc.

But the warehouse scene in KOTCS got me wondering, "Where is the line?" At what point does a storyteller actually do his audience a disservice by revealing the secrets? Do mysteries have a shelf life? Is it ultimately unsatisfying for an audience if you leave something unsaid or unknown?


Take Chris Carter for instance... Sure the X-Files were good and interesting. But man, was I pissed when the whole thing ended with practically no answers to the multitude of mysteries.

Remember when Mr Carter used to tell us that in certain upcomming episodes, secrets would be revealed, there would be answers to our questions, etc... But by the time said episode passed, it just lead to more questions. I always wondered if mr Carter just invented as he went along, not knowing himself what the whole government conspiracy was. Will I go see the next X-Files movie when it comes out next year? Sure. Anything to see Scully again. lol.

Then take J.J.Abrams when he took us on that rollercoaster called lost. A TON of mysteries and questions at the beginning... That's what hooked us to the show. But by now, with the fourth season nearing its climax, we ha been explained a lot. Sure, there are some mysteries remaining, but we get a sense that the story is getting somewhere and that the writers are leading us to a final goal, and that things WILL be explained sometime in the future.

You need mystery to get your audience interested, but you also need to explain at some point. Or you risk leaving your audience a little frustrated, like the X-Files left me.

Ultradan


Thats a good point. I guess that if the plot somehow revolves around the mystery, then you should probably not leave your audience (or PCs) hanging. I remember being thoroughly confused and ultimately disappointed by the last couple of X-Files seasons.

The mysteries I mentioned above with Lucas, however, are not necessarily central to the plot. They aren't the main ingredients, they're more like the spices that make the whole dish more enjoyable. George Lucas seems to want to explain it all away to us - and from a storytelling aspect, I'm not sure that its a good choice. A good sense of mystery is an enjoyable and ultimately fragile part of these stories, and I think that he is blowing it by wanting to show us what's behind the curtain all the time.


d13 wrote:
George Lucas... seems to have decided (in his later years at least) that its better to reveal a secret than to let your audience live with the mystery...

I agree.

His storytelling has, with time, become increasingly shallow and one-dimensional. He's abandoned complex, compelling human personalities and struggles in favor of movies with fairy-tale simplicity.

If a five-year-old can't follow the character and plot development, he simplifies it.

And mysteries demand more thought and imagination than he wants his audience to have to apply.

IMHO


These are some well-thought-out theories.

By simplifying the script, they made it easy for me to focus on smaller things.

Spoiler:
How did a single skull get out of the deathtrap/spaceship? Through the blowhole? Then why only one?

Why did Indy say "she had a sword...a rapier of some kind"? Good God! he's Jonesey...he would know the particular swordsmith/mineral breakdown/and teacher that tought Blanchett how to fight!

How did a 70-year-old fight a big Russian/"Nazi" dude (who looked like he rolled a crit when swinging a massive chain at his calf/ankle) and take 5 shots to the face/head?

Why didnt the Ark burn the US intel insignia off its container like in Raiders?

Could the "puzzle" in the jailcell been any easier to figure out?

Werent the Ray Park-trained ninjas in the first gravesite supposed to be "Living dead Guards" according to legend? What happened to them? Why were they afraid of Jonesey's gun?

Im not even going to go into Tarzan or SuperRefrigerator! (Though imdb has an informal poll for how many people think that fridge should be nominated for an academy award!)

Another thing...why is it funny/acceptable for Mutt to get racked a half dozen times while fighting Blanchett? And speaking of that, why was that particular stretch of trackless jungle paved so that he could balance perfectly whilst "Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin!"-ing about.

Why does it "drop three times"? And how did they all get back into the vehicle so friggin easily?

Most of the story points were telegraphed way early, as well. Who is the traitor dropping the blinking red lights?!??! Is Mutt Indy's son?!?!!?

Im going to start rambling here if I dont shut down. I realize there were crazy over-the-top things in the other movies...but it seems like there were a few stretched between amazing set pieces and funny or cool dialog. This one just had too many goofy things strung together with baaaad dialog. And, the Burger King toy my nephew got doesnt have ANYTHING to do with the movie! Indy on top of a pyramid. Press down on the figure and sand falls away revealing THE crystal skull. WHAT?

**EDIT: Oh yeah. The traps/puzzles seemed to be written for a videogame based on the movie. The retractable stairs especially felt like level 7.2 where you have to pause for a split second before jumping up and to the right to get the bonus life.

And- "Space between spaces" "Knowledge was their treasure". You remember that Alan Quartermain movie from the 80's trying to cash in on the Indy craze? They said in that one "The diamonds belong to the mountain". HA! Thats mostly what IJATKOTCS feels like, a copycat-movie...just happened to hire a couple of the original actors. meh

I guess I wasnt the target audience for this movie, but I should've been.


Tatterdemalion wrote:

If a five-year-old can't follow the character and plot development, he simplifies it.

And mysteries demand more thought and imagination than he wants his audience to have to apply.

IMHO

Not that surprising, when most of his income over the last 25-30 years has been from licensing and merchandise. Couple that with not having directed a movie for those same 30 years while people worship at his feet...

I mean, I still like the Star Wars franchise (maybe because I've seen maybe 2/3rds of one of the prequels and left it at that?) and I absolutely agree that Leia mentioning that Obi Wan "...served my father in the Clone Wars" did more to spark my imagination and sense of wonder than, you know, actually seeing these clones in that 2/3s of Attack of the Clones. But we also shouldn't forget that (in my opinion) the best epsiode, The Empire Strikes Back, was written and directed by someone else and that Return of the Jedi was also directed by someone else. I think that Lucas comes up with some great premises and flashes of inspiration, but he's much more interested in the toys. If he had handed a competent screenwriter and director a list of ideas and a plot outline, he would have been better off.

In my opinion, of course.


James Keegan wrote:


Not that surprising, when most of his income over the last 25-30 years has been from licensing and merchandise. Couple that with not having directed a movie for those same 30 years while people worship at his feet...

I mean, I still like the Star Wars franchise (maybe because I've seen maybe 2/3rds of one of the prequels and left it at that?) and I absolutely agree that Leia mentioning that Obi Wan "...served my father in the Clone Wars" did more to spark my imagination and sense of wonder than, you know, actually seeing these clones in that 2/3s of Attack of the Clones. But we also shouldn't forget that (in my opinion) the best epsiode, The Empire Strikes Back, was written and directed by someone else and that Return of the Jedi was also directed by someone else. I think that Lucas comes up with some great premises and flashes of inspiration, but he's much more interested in the toys. If he had handed a competent screenwriter and director a list of ideas and a plot outline, he would have been better off.

In my opinion, of course.

I could not agree more.

Scarab Sages

Pathfinder Maps Subscriber

I agree that telling us about the force was a mistake but I do not think the bounty hunter was a mistake I liked that bit of continuity. What I think was ridiculus was having R2 and C3PO join us again and for Darth Vader not to know the droid he built as a child and a droid that was with him and his woman up until the end of his life as Manikin makes no sense. R2 maybe - the way it played out but 3PO not the way they did it. I would rather they were never explained and just were owned by the Pricess in eplisode 4.

Scarab Sages

R-type wrote:
I could not agree more.

Same here. I got a huge thrill watching the giant yellow EPISODE I text scroll into the background that first time; it was pretty much all downhill from there.


<Weeps.>

He has failed us.

Liberty's Edge

I used to bash Ep I; then my boy Miles splained it to me:
there's really two movies there, one is about this annoying little kid and Jar Jar, the other is about this lightsaber fight with Darth Maul.
It's really about the best damn lightsaber fight there ever was. It's about the best damn lightsaber fight there ever will be. You gotta, like, accent the positive, man.

Liberty's Edge

Heathansson wrote:

I used to bash Ep I; then my boy Miles splained it to me:

there's really two movies there, one is about this annoying little kid and Jar Jar, the other is about this lightsaber fight with Darth Maul.
It's really about the best damn lightsaber fight there ever was. It's about the best damn lightsaber fight there ever will be. You gotta, like, accent the positive, man.

If you ask my 4 year old daughter to tell you what happens in Episode I, she remembers R2D2 repairing the ship during the Queen's escape (because she thinks he's cute, and she has a thing for robots), the giant sea monster (because she has a thing for sea monsters), and the lightsaber battle at the end (probably because I think it's so cool). She has to be reminded about Jar Jar, who she calls 'silly,' and then she wants to talk about R2D2 some more.

So, to my mind she has grasped the positives--robots, monsters, and sword fights.

Liberty's Edge

My kids like Jar Jar...but my son is all about the lightsabers.
And wookies.


Heathansson wrote:

It's about the best damn lightsaber fight there ever

will be. You gotta, like, accent the positive, man.

As a martial arts aficionado I have to say that this was one of the best staff and sword fights I've ever seen. And they were lightsabers. I'm totally with the wolfman on this. This fight WAS the movie for me.


Ray Park's Kung Fu is beautiful.

I can't say it enough.

Liberty's Edge

Then you see Ep4's original first ever lightsaber fight, and you're like, "wtf?!?!?"
Ray Park's awesome.


I actually wish they hadn't killed him off.

If they did a prequel featuring him I'd be all over it... just for the awesome kung fu.

Liberty's Edge

I was bummed about the first one, because I heard 2 rumors that didn't pan:

1)the Millenium Falcon was Qi Gon's ship

2) army of Mandalorian Anti-Jedi fighters. A freakin army of Boba Fetts, in jet packs and mandalorian armor. I know that's what the clones were in effect, but it would've been tighter.

Liberty's Edge

Kruelaid wrote:

I actually wish they hadn't killed him off.

If they did a prequel featuring him I'd be all over it... just for the awesome kung fu.

Right on... I got a comic where he came back with a cybernetic bottom half and tried to kill baby Luke and Obi Wan and Uncle Owen fought him off...I think a lot more people than you had the same wish.

They brought Boba Fett back in the books and comics,...


Iron Fist starring Ray Park, 2008.

Liberty's Edge

Far out, man.
They need Luke Cage, though...;)

Liberty's Edge

I wish they would do that movie totally 70's style, with Power Man with the big yellow shirt, and Misty Knight, and Iron Fist in the green spandex gi with the black dragon tat on his chest and everything.
I mean, toatlly retro; none of this "this s$!* just went down in the Marvel Universe in 2007, man. They don't dress like that no more's."

Sovereign Court Contributor

I haven't seen the new Indy movie yet.

The only thing I remember from Episode I is Palpatine's suppressed smirk at the end when he sees that everything has fallen into place for him to become the emperor. That facial expression made the movie worth all the Jar-Jar in the world.

I long ago realized that Lucas lost faith in his initial visions. He no longer believes in what he believed back when he made Star Wars. This is why we ended up with Greedo shooting first and medichlorians and no episodes 7-9.

Grand Lodge

Andrew Turner wrote:
So, to my mind she has grasped the positives--robots, monsters, and sword fights.

Seriously, the three SW prequels aren't bad if you pay no attention to the dialogue and filter out the parts where Hayden Christensen tries to act. Of course, that only leaves robots, monsters and sword fights... And Christopher Lee!

Liberty's Edge

The whole first 1/2 hour of Ep III was the coolest buncha stuff ever.

Liberty's Edge

Vattnisse wrote:
Andrew Turner wrote:
So, to my mind she has grasped the positives--robots, monsters, and sword fights.
Seriously, the three SW prequels aren't bad if you pay no attention to the dialogue and filter out the parts where Hayden Christensen tries to act. Of course, that only leaves robots, monsters and sword fights... And Christopher Lee!

Christopher Lee could say all his lines backwards and yell "Gackk!!' at the end of every sentence, and he would still be the greatest.

Liberty's Edge

Heathansson wrote:
The whole first 1/2 hour of Ep III was the coolest buncha stuff ever.

I will admit, I enjoyed the two minutes at the end when all the Clone Troopers 'switched on.'

Sadly, I enjoyed the 12 minute Clone Wars cartoons more than the newest movies.


James Keegan wrote:


...and I absolutely agree that Leia mentioning that Obi Wan "...served my father in the Clone Wars" did more to spark my imagination and sense of wonder than, you know, actually seeing these clones in that 2/3s of Attack of the Clones.

Did that Clone Wars tease suffer from too much build up in our imaginations or its poor execution in Episode II? I think that the Clone Wars had to be expounded upon in the prequels because Lucas always intended for it to be a major issue in the over-arching storyline.

And from Ultradan's observation earlier, I think that mysteries (or hooks in that case) directly involving the plot line HAVE to be revealed and sorted out eventually or it will drive your audience (or PCs) crazy.

But why does Lucas feel the need to explain everything to us these days?

If something intrigues your audience, is it ok to simply let their imaginations expound upon it? or do you have a responsibility as a storyteller to give them more information? Do mysteries have an expiration date - some point where they cross over from being intriguing to being simply annoying? What can a good storyteller do to keep that from happening? How can you keep your audience intrigued and keep your secrets without sending everyone up a tree (like the X-Files) or pandering to them (like recent Lucas movies)?

James Keegan wrote:
But we also shouldn't forget that (in my opinion) the best epsiode, The Empire Strikes Back, was written and directed by someone else and that Return of the Jedi was also directed by someone else. I think that Lucas comes up with some great premises and flashes of inspiration, but he's much more interested in the toys.

True, the screenplay was written by someone else but Lucas was still credited with the story. That can mean a lot of different things, but I'll bet that most of the plot elements, set pieces, characters, etc. were birthed from Lucas's imagination. The screenwriter just made sure that the script didn't suck (like episodes I,II,III).

Liberty's Edge

James Keegan wrote:
But we also shouldn't forget that (in my opinion) the best epsiode, The Empire Strikes Back, was written and directed by someone else and that Return of the Jedi was also directed by someone else. I think that Lucas comes up with some great premises and flashes of inspiration, but he's much more interested in the toys.
d13 wrote:
, the screenplay was written by someone else but Lucas was still credited with the story. That can mean a lot of different things, but I'll bet that most of the plot elements, set pieces, characters, etc. were birthed from Lucas's imagination. The screenwriter just made sure that the script didn't suck...

Honestly, while Empire is the best, and the story is amazing, I don't think the script is all that great. In fact, to me, none of the SW scripts are really very good, but the story as a single piece is what carries it.

Oh, frak! DRADIS--contact!


Vattnisse wrote:
Andrew Turner wrote:
So, to my mind she has grasped the positives--robots, monsters, and sword fights.
Seriously, the three SW prequels aren't bad if you pay no attention to the dialogue and filter out the parts where Hayden Christensen tries to act. Of course, that only leaves robots, monsters and sword fights... And Christopher Lee!

Anyone seen Jumper with, ahem, everyone's least favorite actor?

Dark Archive

Andrew Turner wrote:
Heathansson wrote:
The whole first 1/2 hour of Ep III was the coolest buncha stuff ever.

I will admit, I enjoyed the two minutes at the end when all the Clone Troopers 'switched on.'

Sadly, I enjoyed the 12 minute Clone Wars cartoons more than the newest movies.

I agree wholeheartedly, and Lucas is spawning yet ANOTHER Clone Wars cartoon which goes to show their popularity. What's amazing is the CW are cooler than the movies despite everyone knows how the Wars turn out and the Jedi get shafted in the end.


Kruelaid wrote:
Anyone seen Jumper with, ahem, everyone's least favorite actor?

Yeah I have. It was actually pretty darn cool.


Andrew Turner wrote:
Christopher Lee could say all his lines backwards and yell "Gackk!!' at the end of every sentence, and he would still be the greatest.

Truer words about Star Wars have never been spoken, in this or any other universe.

Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Entertainment / Movies / George Lucas and the power of mystery All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Movies