
Kruelaid |

I believe you will find some instructions at IC (they are brief and right under the text input windows on the 'roll dice' page), or a little playing around with it will probably reveal all. You'll find that after your roll is complete you just have to click on the bbcode below and it will automatically copy to your clipboard. Then you just paste it into your post.

Kruelaid |

Hey Rev,
I caught your ooc, let us make like we're together. We can start up a conversation with Rufinus and Gnaeus on the game thread and that should do it.
With one Goth friend already and in the international spirit of the city, it seemed appropriate to befriend someone from farther east as well.
Let's all just say we 3 were on our way to a meal when the rain struck, and we can take this opportunity for some in character talk and meeting the other 2.

![]() |

Hey Rad,
Modius ha just sort of latched onto you recently, recognizing his need for a little brawn around to keep him safe. Of course, this companionship is accompanied by a constant and no doubt annoying chatter about either Jesus or Modius' manifold plans to get rich and retire in the country.
Copy... brace Modius for Hrothgar's heathen ways.

Gnaeus Cornelius Papyrus |

Yes... forgive him o Lord or smite him where he stands, either way will reveal a portion of Your Divine Wisdom
"Hrmf. If he was to do any smiting it should have been when they were nailing him up."
Sorry, not meaning to be religiously offensive for real, just Paper and his 'cutting' remarks. Get it? Paper? Cut? Feh, I gotta get more sleep

Patrick Curtin |

Okay, I think we've established that religious humour will not bother anyone in here.
I know, just making cutting remarks about Christianity can bring responses that make the 4e threads look like the 'Care Bears Hug-n-Love Hour'. Just prefacing that any smarmy remarks made by our cynical Roman friend are owned by him alone, and that the puppetmaster does not claim them himself. Standard disclaimer stuff :)

Rev Rosey |

Kruelaid wrote:I know, just making cutting remarks about Christianity can bring responses that make the 4e threads look like the 'Care Bears Hug-n-Love Hour'. Just prefacing that any smarmy remarks made by our cynical Roman friend are owned by him alone, and that the puppetmaster does not claim them himself. Standard disclaimer stuff :)Okay, I think we've established that religious humour will not bother anyone in here.
Just joining the standard disclaimer gang. And "Care Bears Hug-n-Love Hour" had me spitting coffee. Btw, my user name is just a kind of bizarre in-joke, it's not an indication of evangelism.

Patrick Curtin |

Just joining the standard disclaimer gang. And "Care Bears Hug-n-Love Hour" had me spitting coffee. Btw, my user name is just a kind of bizarre in-joke, it's not an indication of evangelism.
Glad my hallucinitory early morning humor can get your coffee moving. I figured no one playing in Evening of an Empire would really have a beef, but I know lots of people lurk around PbP threads (I'm one) and might take the comment out of context.

Taliesin Hoyle |

I am a bright, but I like to play religious characters. I also like to play a different character concept each time. I find I have to keep my tongue around religious people, because they seldom get called out on their disease, and they get very defensive very quickly. Telling a madman that he is mad does not endear them to you.

Taliesin Hoyle |

About the start of combat. In your absense, we got quite involved with forging links between our characters. I was not expecting combat, so I started to narrate a few actions. If we suddenly backtrack to before any of us said anything to anyone else, it seems we will have lost something. Would it be possible to keep what we have written so far, and adapt to it?

Kruelaid |

I am a bright, but I like to play religious characters. I also like to play a different character concept each time. I find I have to keep my tongue around religious people, because they seldom get called out on their disease, and they get very defensive very quickly. Telling a madman that he is mad does not endear them to you.
I make a habit of not sharing my spiritual life with people not because I'm sensitive about my madness but because of my aversion to religion. Some of the religious are decent people and their faith is an integral part of the good deeds they do in the world, which is fine, but others sicken me so terribly and use their faith to such loathsome ends that I actually begin to feel sick around them. I do my best to keep them apart, mad though they both may be.
My habit of being blunt, however, and speaking frankly on the subject of religion, doctrines, and matters of spirit has seen me thrown out of three churches... and I speak as someone who has formally studied religion. So I can sympathize with your keeping your tongue although my reasons may take a slightly different shape.

Rev Rosey |

Armed as he is with only a scalpel (and that's packed away), Isat is toast as things stand. I think this is going to be one for our barbarian pals, with Rufinus in the front line, since he's roughly in the right place already.
Just to see if I'm clear what's happening.
Red heading towards fallen wounded (not in portico flexing - Isat suggested he get behind injured bloke). So he, Isat, Modius and Paper are all in the same general area.
Rufinus is with injured chap.
Crazy emerging from alley with hook/blade of some kind. Crazy is yelling, so we would have heard him?
Is that roughly right or have I missed someting glaringly obvious?
How far is Crazy in the alley from injured chap?
EDIT: Aha. Another of those lovely all post at the same time moments.

Kruelaid |

One of the things that I am liking about Modius is that he is an early product of a Church that had only recently become a form of social control for the Empire.
He doesn't have a spiritual life and doesn't really know much about religion, he just knows he's supposed to do what the Church says, and he's learned that if he talks about Jesus a lot certain people will look after him.

Rev Rosey |

Yes I can seen what your saying. Just give a moment to think things over
Of course. My earlier post was just an attempt to summarise, not force anything in any particular direction.
I get confused easily, so I spend my life writing lists - this is just another manifestation. Please accept apologies for any upset.

Herald of the empire |

I have thought things over. And I think that it is best that I drop the Empire in evening. It has turned out to be a much more demanding endeavour then I had originally imagined. I have been out of the loop for a while having not Dm since 2ed. between researching rules, the campaign backdrop, composing my entries and my daily to living obligations I don’t seem to have enough time to adequately keep abreast with the posts and provide the experience you deserve.
I really appreciate the fullness of attention that you folks here have given the campaign and the creativities of characters and role-playing.
My sincerest apologies.

Taliesin Hoyle |

Perhaps take a day or two to consider. The mechanics are not important, story is. As long as you are able to spend a bit of time each day.
It is your decision. I hope the sequencing issue is not the cause. This was your first time. Go easy on yourself. Your start was very tight, your backstory interesting and your setting distinctive.
I thought of saying "mind if I take over as D.M?, and my wife walked in and said 'Honey, no. You don't have the time, you already have D&D Sundays, Magic Saturdays and Storyteller Thursdays'" Point.
Let us know what you decide.

Rev Rosey |

Of course you have to take whatever decision is best for you and of course I will abide by whatever it is. Can I also add how much I've enjoyed myself with everyone here - it's been fun, informative and helped reignite my long-dormant interest in rpgs.
At any rate, whatever you do decide, many thanks for what we've had.

Patrick Curtin |

I know a lot, have read a lot, but my DM skills are sorely lacking. I think we should give Herald a day or two to think about it. If Herald stands by his descision I'll try it if perhaps you'd be my rule-supervising wingman Kruelaid.
PS: Sorry about Dead Horse. That was an avatar that did a lot in the line of doody.

Kruelaid |

I know a lot, have read a lot, but my DM skills are sorely lacking. I think we should give Herald a day or two to think about it. If Herald stands by his descision I'll try it if perhaps you'd be my rule-supervising wingman Kruelaid.
PS: Sorry about Dead Horse. That was an avatar that did a lot in the line of doody.
Gary and I have talked about it and everything is cool. I am (and already was) laying low on 4E and the alias is no longer locked.

Kruelaid |

I know a lot, have read a lot, but my DM skills are sorely lacking. I think we should give Herald a day or two to think about it. If Herald stands by his descision I'll try it if perhaps you'd be my rule-supervising wingman Kruelaid.
PS: Sorry about Dead Horse. That was an avatar that did a lot in the line of doody.
Only if you want to, we're not going to hold you to anything. And if you do, feel free to redact the game rules. There's a lot of customization here, in particular with Rev's character and it might be a problem for you.
I am already planning a pbp and I don't really want to take this one up....