Thulos's Alignment

[prosfilaes]

I know this is another alignment thread, but in book 6, there's a section on the rise of gluttony, with the villain being CN. Except (a) he's a lich, and (b) to become a lich, he slaughtered 1,001 slaves and bathed in the blood. Neutral villains and villain redemption is fine, but I don't see any evidence he's tried to reform, and that's pretty far over the moral horizon to be neutral. So why?

[Mikaze]

While I am absolutely in support of non-evil undead and complex antagonists, I think this may be a typo situation.

I mean, if someone was playing CN I'd hope I'd be a bit suspicious long before they "accidentallied" slaves up into the triple digits. ;)

[Shadar Aman]

Given that Paizo has been pretty hardline about the whole "undead are inherently evil" thing, it seems like this was probably a mistake. Unless I missed something where intelligent undead can be other alignments, in which case we can fall back to the part where he slaughtered a bunch of slaves and bathed in their blood.

I'm calling typo as well.

[James Jacobs]

It's a typo. He should be chaotic evil.

(I'm guessing that the CN came from the fact that the typical taiga giant is CN.)

Now I have to go punish Adam. MWA HA HA HA HA HA!