![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Anonymous User 99 |
![Market Patron](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/19OpenerHangingPlaza01c.jpg)
Anonymous User 99 wrote:Whatever you do... do not look down.I'm afraid I can't help it, the unfortunate tale of your uncle has left me feeling sad.
Feel not this melancholy, one without god. Let us revel in how nice the fall must have felt to Ol' Anonymous 15... who had always complained up to that point in his life that he could never find a stiff enough breeze for his liking. At least he died as he would have lived, in a state of wind-tunnel type bliss. His legs pierced the earth like a lawn dart and his bushy orange fro was all that remained aboveground like some ill conceived shrubbery. A schnauzer happened by and christened him with tinklings before we could extract the poor fellow, but I have no regrets because at least I didn't plummet to my death.
Choosing an epitaph came easily.
"Here lies someone who lived and died and leapt and cried."
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Dirk Gently |
![Nar'shinddah Sugimar](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/NarShindah.jpg)
I have not won. That does not mean I lose. I do, but my first statement does not state that. The apparent paradox of the previous statement should be overlooked, that statement stating that a statement does not state, but of course statements state. It is in their etymology. Evey statement states something, and the redundancy and repetitiveness of that statement should also be overlooked, as statements stating something is not, in fact, repetitive, but the conjunction of a noun and its root verb. Or, wait, did the idea of stating something, and thus the verb, give rise to the state of having a stating noun, or is it the other way around (hey, I'm allowed to rhyme some of the time)? And now I am in a state of stating my confusion over the stated origin of statements, but does it really matter, as we have all stated that we lose anyway, regardless of how it is put into a statement.
Hoping I have not put you all in a state of confusion.
-Dirk (though, was in necessary for me to restate my name?)
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
SCREAMS the Goblin |
![Goblyn](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/Goblyn.jpg)
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII LLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!
-SCREAMS the goblin
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![Protectar](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/GoL11Protectar.jpg)
I have not won. That does not mean I lose. I do, but my first statement does not state that. The apparent paradox of the previous statement should be overlooked, that statement stating that a statement does not state, but of course statements state. It is in their etymology. Evey statement states something, and the redundancy and repetitiveness of that statement should also be overlooked, as statements stating something is not, in fact, repetitive, but the conjunction of a noun and its root verb. Or, wait, did the idea of stating something, and thus the verb, give rise to the state of having a stating noun, or is it the other way around (hey, I'm allowed to rhyme some of the time)? And now I am in a state of stating my confusion over the stated origin of statements, but does it really matter, as we have all stated that we lose anyway, regardless of how it is put into a statement.
Hoping I have not put you all in a state of confusion.
-Dirk (though, was in necessary for me to restate my name?)
I didn't read your post, therefore I didn't find it confusing in the least. Does that mean I win?
No. Alas. I lose.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
![Imrijka](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO1125-Imrijka2_90.jpeg)
All i can say is: There is nothing xkcd can not solve.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![Paper Golem](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/golemtrio1.jpg)
All i can say is: There is nothing xkcd can not solve.
So true. they even managed to solve my problems with Growing Up!
Also, I just lost...again...
And is it just me or is this page wider then all the others?