| mangamuscle |
Any chance that books like this that Pathfinder deems there are not enough buyers for another printing to become available via OneBookShelf (drivethrurpg) Print on Demand services? Maybe there are not thousands, but probably a few hundreds of people want a dead tree copy, you may call it service for the community.
Strife2002
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I'm disappointed that the errata doesn't cover the Savage Technologist's rage bonuses issue. It's an easy enough house rule fix, but still disappointed.
No errata necessary, as it's correct as written. James Jacobs thought there was an error as well at first, but then someone pointed out what they thought the intent was, and he realized they were correct.
| Wolf Munroe |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
This product is now available in Print on Demand.
So I finally ordered this book Print on Demand.
What is supposed to be on the inside covers?| Zaister |
Aaron Shanks wrote:This product is now available in Print on Demand.So I finally ordered this book Print on Demand.
What is supposed to be on the inside covers?
The front inside cover has four different tables for glitches of timeworn equipment, while the back inside cover has the front cover picture without any words and logos, as was usual for this product line.
| Wolf Munroe |
Wolf Munroe wrote:The front inside cover has four different tables for glitches of timeworn equipment, while the back inside cover has the front cover picture without any words and logos, as was usual for this product line.Aaron Shanks wrote:This product is now available in Print on Demand.So I finally ordered this book Print on Demand.
What is supposed to be on the inside covers?
Thanks for letting me know. I found the table of glitches and cover art without labels but wasn't sure that was meant to be the material from the covers. The POD version doesn't have anything printed on the inside of the front or back covers, but does have the contents of the front and back covers printed as an additional page at the end of the book.
When I was worried that I might be missing something, and after I posted my question, I looked to see what was on the front/back covers of a couple other Campaign Setting books. Like this one, the Construct Handbook had the front cover reprinted at the back, but the First World Realm of the Fey book has a map of the First World that I initially thought spanned the front and back covers, but upon further inspection saw was just duplicated inside the back cover without labels.
Anyway, I've just finished my initial reading of Technology Guide. Lots of stuff I'd like to use, but I'm not actually running a sci-fi/technology-focused game, so I'll have to choose judiciously.
| keftiu |
Can this book get an update for Pathfinder 2e - This post is just to show interest in PF2e tech book
You might like this thread of like-minded folks.
| crackjackflood |
crackjackflood wrote:Can this book get an update for Pathfinder 2e - This post is just to show interest in PF2e tech bookThanks for your feedback. It sure would bring Pathfinder and Starfinder closer together. Be sure to check our Guns & Gears and Treasure Vault.
I noticed some items/features in these books use some of the mechanics of some items/features in the Technology guide. Sadly not really a fan of Starfinder rules or how it does Sci-fi overall. I like the Idea of having technology that is completely divorced from magic. I also like having magical technology. It really comes down how items and features decribed I don't really get or like the description for the Chameleon suit in G&G as an example (It seems like it would be uncomfortable and somewhat noisy I also personally find it hard to imagine) Where as the Chameleon suit in the Technology guide seems to me at least is more thematically tangible.
The Technology guide Chameleon suit also is a good alternative to invisibility. This is to me is how technology should function as a way of bringing magical abilities and effects to someone who doesn't have them.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" while the qoute is true, in a world of high magic wouldn't their be people trying to essentially develop technology so you are not reliant on magic.
Thats for the reply.