![]()
![]()
Probably too late to fix: I set up order 4604349 the day after my December subscription order (4601418) was spawned. I expected this order to ship from the sidecart with that subscription order; it did not. Am I confused about how sidecart orders interact with subscriptions, or did something go wrong here? ![]()
Not sure how much of this is under Paizo's control, but I have a few minor gripes about the venue.
That said, I very much appreciated that the hotel restaurant did NOT run a special gamer menu to the exclusion of regular food this weekend. As a further improvement, perhaps having one in addition to their regular menu would be a good thing. ![]()
I am currently not receiving Paizo email; apparently, the mail server on your end identifies itself with an internal hostname and is running afoul of my spam filters. Could you let me know what IP addresses to whitelist, and/or convince your mail server to send a public FQDN? Log entries (excerpt): Jan 14 12:47:02 andraste postfix/smtpd[53600]: connect from paizo3.paizo.com[207.115.69.197]
![]()
Sharaya wrote:
Doing the same thing on my subscription. ![]()
This may be a known issue: Checking my Kickstarter pledge for Pathfinder Online, I can see the PDF rewards, both delivered and not, listed fine in the "where's my reward?" sidebar. I long since purchased the print pack add-on; none of the physical books appear in that sidebar. Neither do the miniatures that were part of my pledge level. ![]()
Quote: anything we make available via the Goblinworks store - which will all be related to in-game purchases, game time, and other MMO related content. I note with some distress the mention of 'in-game purchases' and 'other MMO related content.' To me, this sounds suspiciously like a micro-transaction based business model, something I find alarming. Is this really the direction PFO is expected to be going? ![]()
I was going to have the party stumble over a portable phonograph fairly early on, with an unlabeled record on it. When they figure out to wind it up, I'm going to play the Russian Internationale and hand the Tongues oracle an English translation... Yes, I know it's the White Army out there, but that doesn't mean there isn't a communist sympathizer somewhere in the ranks. ![]()
Either in a stepped aquaeduct or even a suitable riverbed - gravel or rock bottom, little exposure to soil. I'd consider most stream water in, say, the Alps to be potable to this day, certainly above tree level. Regarding snowpack water, on doing some digging, I think I mistranslated. Snowpack water should be fine - I was thinking of more temporary, low-volume accumulations. ![]()
I'd question the quality of snowpack water. Personally, I'd use glacial water and/or find a suitable aquifer. I don't see in principle why it wouldn't be possible, as long as you start high enough. Roman architects suggested that a slope greater than 1:4800 would increase water pressure on the channel to the point of causing premature erosion damage; aquaeducts requiring a greater slope either used stepped channels or were frequently interrupted by reservoirs to manage pressure and flow speed of the water. If you're tapping a glacier in the Nomen Heights, you probably want to cascade the water down most of the mountain, and build a 'regular' aquaeduct from there. The height difference of, for example, the Pont du Gard is 17m height over 50km length. The Aqua Marcia in Rome was ~90km long, with a height differential of 260m. If my memory doesn't completely deceive me, that is about right for the distance from Tuskwater Lake to the Tors. ![]()
I find it extremely counterintuitive that the new checkout process skips selecting a shipment method altogether and defaults to USPS. I keep having to remember to go back and pick my preferred shipment method. IMO, that step should not be skipped and force the user to go back at all. Further, the default should be choosable (only very rarely will I need something shipped so urgently it cannot wait until the next subscription shipment, so defaulting to the USPS means extra clicks and a chance to get it wrong, rather than making my life easier). ![]()
Axehold wrote: Are you interested in 2 people, Im a recent move from Washington DC, and I too and looking for a pathfinder game to join up! Axe, I don't know. The manager of Games and Gizmos tells me I should anticipate getting an email from a couple that was interested as well. If they do turn up and we mesh up, counting Eboy, I have a full table. At the same time, for all I know, you're them - stranger things :) Eboy: I ran the game as gestalt the last few sessions due to being down to three players - work attrition claimed the rest of the group. Non-gestalt, we have a hedge witch, a sorcerer and a paladin. They're all level 2. 15-point buy, only Paizo sources, don't use races more expensive than 15 points by Race Guide build rules. If you want to build a custom race, definitely contact me ahead of time, either by PM or by email at andreas AT turriff DOT net. ![]()
Nihimon, Shane, grazie. I apologize for the earlier outburst - my tolerance for regenerating humanoids with 6 hit dice is limited. Now, if I launch any MMORPG, I have no expectation of being able to do everything (or in many cases, even a lot of things) by myself. Nature of the beast. No, my concern is simply that by reversing the order of 'this is what I want to do --> what kind of help do I need to find' as the poster I originally responded to stated, people like myself who are on a limited schedule outside of taking time off work will find themselves marginalized in what they /can/ do simply by nature of who is online during their game-devoted time. This, as I said, does not strike me as a feature no matter what angle I view it from. ( Incidentally, I have the same problem in the cited other games... maybe larger cohesive communities like envisioned here /will/ help that. ) ![]()
You had me up until here. Pax Keovar wrote: - Instead of choosing what content to engage in and seeing who is necessary and available, you'll tend to see who is available and use that to decide what content to engage in. This needs clarification, though. In the best case, this suggests PFO should be viewn as 'I have two hours to kill, let's see who's here and what we can do.' This is fine. Unfortunately, my mind immediately went to the worst case, that being, player A logs in with the specific intention of working on progression in activity X, and will need help. Seeing who is available, he realizes that plan cannot proceed, as there is noone available to help, for one reason or another. This may well be a mindset difference, but I have a problem right about where I am expected to treat what little off time I have as surprise egg. Yes, sometimes, a few hours just need killing, and that's fine. Most of the time, I know that I want to accomplish X and have Y hours this evening. Most of the time, the Y hours are not negotiable. Do I really want to get sidetracked doing Z that I am not even interested in, just because that is what people are available for? Not sure there is a game engine answer for it, but it sure does not look like a feature to me, no matter what side I approach that from. ![]()
BigUglySquirrel wrote:
I'm still working on the 'who.' As for 'what,' I am taking this as an opportunity to play a wizard. ![]()
I have recently and unexpectedly stopped receiving Paizo email. I have not reconfigured my mail server. Starting in March, emails from Paizo started logging the following errors on this server: 2013-03-07T20:22:14.498916-08:00 freya postfix/smtpd[79915]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from paizo3.paizo.com[208.79.150.38]: 550 5.7.1 <Paizo-3.local>: Helo command rejected: Host not found; from=<customer.service@paizo.com> to=<andreas@turriff.net> proto=ESMTP helo=<Paizo-3.local> Is there any chance you can talk your mail server into providing a proper HELO hostname?
|