Valeros

Thebigham's page

Organized Play Member. 17 posts. 4 reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 5 Organized Play characters.


RSS


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Agreed, this is going to be great.


Wow way to go!


//Loved the story, felt the mechanics were a little off. I left a review with more details. But it gave me an idea. Maybe you thought of this before and it doesnt work idk but ...

I had a general idea, that could be applied to any PFS/PF2E content. Writers shouldn't have to also do the mechanics and encounters. Writers should focus on the story and intent they want to get across. And then you could have "mechanics" come in and insert the encounters and skill DC stuff.

It could look something like this:

Writer: This is an incredible story, here are the characters the party will meet... story... story..

First encounter: Bandits in an alley. The party will meet bandits that are from X group and will fight to the death. Extra flavor bit for leader of bandits. [ Mechanic will then come in and flesh this out with the right scaling, abilities and monsters]

Second encounter: Party will have to convince NPC to give them widget but as they do the widget is stolen by a BEAR! Party has to navigate the crowded streets and eventually be lead into the forest to catch the BEAR to get their widget back. Any extra flavor bits. [Mechanic comes in and again fleshes this out with skill checks etc.]

Letting the writers write, and someone else really focused on the rules and mechanics seems like itll produce a better product overall. I have no inside information but this seems like itll allow the writers to write more, or richer, and itll allow for the rules/balance/scale to be consistent across all formats by having a group focused on it completely.

Similar to how you have illustrators and writers, now you just add in mechanics!

Just an idea.


Yes!! Season 5 has paid for itself so many times over, can't wait for season 6. This package is include value!!


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Dynamic ring size choices based on style and not function will make me not buy this. Sorry. I am sad too cause I love supporting but this is the only? way to get the message across.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
SpartanCPA wrote:
toby.kind wrote:
Well, it would be appropriate to have that support to have the larger version as an option as part of this premium module, wouldn't it?
They certainly could make a second, thicker ring and include it in an update. A module can include multiple rings, but only one can be used at any time. Like I said above, this was largely just an aesthetic choice, but it's not a forced choice on the end user, since the user can decide whatever token ring they want.

But what if the ring you want is a regular "thin" style you are left with all that white space.


HolyFlamingo! wrote:
I sadly gotta sit out this year. When will these be available to the general public?

oh really? Hmm


keftiu wrote:

Very pleased to hear that the Couatl divinities will be in this one.

Thebigham wrote:
Will this get a sketch cover?
Has any Lost Omens book gotten one? I assumed that was a Rulebooks thing.

I thought I heard or read something else was but maybe not. You could be right.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Will this get a sketch cover?


5 people marked this as a favorite.

I would just talk to the players. This is an ooc conversation.


Michael Sayre wrote:
Lord Viator wrote:
The only thing that kinda annoys me is that it's difficult to read these as a changelog with the new and old errata being smashed into one entry since we've moved away from printing-based errata for the newer rounds. I think it'd be helpful if maybe there was some dating or something so that a person only interesting in seeing the most recent changes from last time could distinguish them easily.
This is high on our list of desired functionality improvements but will likely need to wait until after the website updates are complete before we can start moving forward with implementation.

Unless that is close on the horizon, could you, as a short term solution, just put a month/year at the beginning?

Example: "Page 30 (4/2024): Add the attack trait to Magnetic Pinions."

**

3 people marked this as a favorite.

I hope we get the deluxe Foundry module for this too! Please!


Oh wow! I love their work! What about society ?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Just waiting for release, can't wait to see those sketch covers.

**

1 person marked this as a favorite.

The Deluxe PFS is amazing. That is all.

**

Doug Hahn wrote:
Hilary Moon Murphy wrote:
Oh my gosh, someone did a continuation of that awesome spreadsheet! Thank you William Cheung (and also to Doug for pointing me there!)
It is linked on my Guides at the bottom of the scenario lists. I was originally going to put maps in the table but William is already maintaining a list.

It looks it hasn't been updated. I am trying to find out which maps are used as stand ins for society lodges. I know the museum is used but curious on any others?

**

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Season 5 Foundry module news??