NobodysHome wrote:
Aranna wrote:
Yeah some of my younger workers have the same attitude (that the weekly schedule is merely a suggestion). Was there a thing for a certain group of parents to do everything they could to shelter their children from responsibility? If so they weren't doing their kids any favors as nobody is going to promote a person who can't be bothered to show up as scheduled. That is if they don't just fire them outright. I wonder if that is a part of the statistic showing a large number of children living at home after school is finished.
I've posted it before and I'll post it again: Show up to work on time, do your job, and don't slack off, and you'll be the best employee your boss has ever had.
Sad, but true.
And now that I've been in the work force for 30+ years, I'll say that slackers have always existed, but a higher percentage of today's teens and early twentysomethings have the "I'm too good for this job" attitude. Yes, I have 50-year-old friends who are STILL like that. But having been on hiring committees for 20+ years now, I am definitely seeing more of the, "Who cares that there's a typo on my resume? It's the cell phone era! No one cares about spelling any more!" attitude and the like.
Not some fundamental paradigm shift, but if I had to throw numbers at the thing I'd say around 10-20% of my 1990's interviews had that, "You should be honored I'm considering working for you" attitude, and nowadays it's closer to 30%. Enough to notice. Not enough to scream that the sky (or flaming bikes) is falling...
rides around the thread
Okay, Freehold is in better shape. Thus isn't as agonizing as it could be.
Still.
HE ain't light.