![]() ![]()
![]() So I'm starting this hunter with bonded mind. Now PFS rules as per Achive of Nethys states:
**This brings us to my question: Is the animal companion considered a PC? Yes: AC is a PC so Bonded Mind cannot be shared between a hunter and his AC. No: AC is an NPC so Bonded Mind can be shared between a hunter and his AC. ![]()
![]() Mystic Lemur wrote:
My DM has me checking for traps in a 10' radius. Where is the RAW about that? I want range modifiers but my DM is unaware. ![]()
![]() Sah wrote:
Yes, After 10 minutes of practice. ![]()
![]() Charnath wrote: Dual wield a whip and a fist. Make an unarmed trip and RAW throw him anywhere within 15'? Actually, he could only throw the guy anywhere within 10' since he only threatens 10'. Ki Throw: Benefit: On a successful unarmed trip attack against a target your size or smaller, you may throw the target prone in any square you threaten rather than its own square. This movement does not provoke attacks of opportunity, and you cannot throw the creature into a space occupied by other creatures. (Emphasis mine) ![]()
![]() Any Coup de Grace build should have Throat Slicer: Benefit(s): When using a one-handed, light, or natural weapon, you can deliver a coup de grace to an unconscious, bound, or pinned target (though not other kinds of helpless targets) as a standard action. This reduces the time to kill for a Coup de Grace and also adds some condition that will work: Pinned, bound. There are also combos that get you a full round action in the surprise round. Lookout teamwork feat with a familiar or animal companion. Can't see a Coup de Grace before the end of the surprise round tho. http://www.d20pfsrd.com/feats/combat-feats/throat-slicer-combat ![]()
![]() I'm in a PFS game and my Wolf has an INT of 3 and Combat Reflexes, Dirty Fighting*, Improved Trip, and Barroom Brawler. Once the AC has INT of 3 he/she can take lots of different feats. My Wolf at level 8 frustrates my DM and trips a lot, esp. when flanking due to Dirty Fighting *(which is not Dirty Trick). http://www.d20pfsrd.com/feats/combat-feats/dirty-fighting-combat/ ![]()
![]() Gohaken wrote:
I'd say yes to your Masterwork Dan Bong question and WF, after all the primary purpose of the Dan Bong is to grapple. I'm not sure as to Initiate vs Maintain as far as RAI or IRL but RAW seems to be a straight +2 to grapple. ![]()
![]() I for one look forward to using my Dan Bong as a piercing weapon with Snake Style and my Master of Many Styles. I'm not sure how that would work or if that's why Ascetic Style is not available in PFS but it sounds like a fun combo with Hamatula Strike. I think the problem is there are so many feats that use IUS as a pre-req that there are some broken combos out there. ![]()
![]() Java Man wrote:
Okay, now that is a sufficient amount of RAW, however You forgot the link I requested, so here we are: Pummeling Style.![]()
![]() Sah wrote: I agree with that last bit, "Weapon focus is several feats effectively" but I'm not sure you know the difference between effectively, an actually. You see AWM only speaks of one Weapon Focus feat. In fact it is not the feat that changes I wrote: The benefits of this bonus Weapon Focus feat last until you choose to practice and apply it to a different racial weapon. So you see it is the benefit and not the feat that is being applied to a different weapon. In the shell game the pea moves around and around but there is still only one pea. I see the RAI that you put forward but the text does not say "This bonus Weapon Focus feat lasts until you choose to practice and replace it with a weapon focus feat for a different racial weapon" instead it says "The benefits of this bonus Weapon Focus feat last until..." It's not replacing the feat it is merely adjusting the target of the feat, which is the same thing Martial Flexiblity does. You might as well argue that when Martial Flexibility allows me to "use that feat with any weapon within the same weapon group" that it ceases to function because the other weapons in the weapon group are not Elven. ![]()
![]() Garbage-Tier Waifu wrote:
I'm confused as to why it doesn't work properly. Weapon Focus, which is mentioned in the RAW of Martial Flexibility is one feat, not several feats as you suggest. It is both technically and actually one feat. I don't see why it can't be altered by more than one feat. The target of Martial Versatility isn't changing, the target of Weapon Focus is. I've heard tell in other forums that Martial Flexibility doesn't work with many feats, but surely it always works with Weapon Focus since it's clearly RAW. ![]()
![]() I only get one Weapon Focus feat. So let's say it's Weapon Focus Elven Branched Spear. Now, if I understand Weapon Groups Elven Branched Spear is a Spear, a Heavy Blade, and a Monk Weapon. So with Martial Versatility does Weapon Focus now apply to the Bo Staff, the Longspear, the Bastard Sword or what? Is there RAW as to what I do with this? ![]()
![]() I'm working on a half-elven Fighter. He's going to start with Ancestral Weapon Mastery to get a floating Weapon Focus. I've already cleared this somewhat wonky wording of Ancestral Weapon Mastery with the DM; I.E. I will get Weapon Focus. How does this feat interact with Martial Versatility? Martial Versatility:
You broaden your study of weapons to encompass multiple similar weapons.
Prerequisites: Fighter level 4th, human. Benefit: Choose one combat feat you know that applies to a specific weapon (e.g., Weapon Focus). You can use that feat with any weapon within the same weapon group. Special: You may take this feat more than once. Each time it applies to a different feat. Ancestral Weapon Mastery:
Prerequisite(s): Base attack bonus +1, weapon familiarity racial trait.
Benefit(s): You’re proficient with all of your race’s racial weapons (the weapons mentioned in your race’s weapon familiarity racial trait). If you’re already proficient with any of those weapons, you instead gain Weapon Focus for one of those weapons as a bonus feat. Furthermore, if you gain Weapon Focus as a bonus feat with one of your racial weapons as a result of this feat, you can change which racial weapon your bonus Weapon Focus feat applies to by engaging in 10 minutes of practice with the new weapon. The benefits of this bonus Weapon Focus feat last until you choose to practice and apply it to a different racial weapon. Elven Weapon Familiarity: Elves are proficient with longbows (including composite longbows), longswords, rapiers, and shortbows (including composite shortbows), and treat any weapon with the word “elven” in its name as a martial weapon. ![]()
![]() So your saying "whenever I damage an opponent with a piercing weapon, I can immediately make a grapple check unless I'm already grappled" Am I interpreting you correctly? This sounds like errata. It seems to me like it gives a grapple check on a successful attack with a piercing weapon and adds a new option to be used with that grapple check. I don't see any wording that states I can't use my grapple check for normal grapple check purposes, only that I have a new option. ![]()
![]() Diego Rossi wrote: If you lose a prerequisite a feat stop working until you regain it. It doesn't say what types I'm limited to except that it must have Weapon Focus so I'll set it to "the one that has Weapon Focus from Ancestral Weapon Mastery". It'll always have the pre-req, it's just the meaning of the pre-req will change. ![]()
![]() If I have enough pre-reqs I can get weapon focus on an Elven weapon with Ancestral Weapon Mastery. Can I then use that as a pre-req for weapon focus? What happen when I choose a different Weapon Focus with AWM? Feat text below:
Benefit(s): You’re proficient with all of your race’s racial weapons (the weapons mentioned in your race’s weapon familiarity racial trait). If you’re already proficient with any of those weapons, you instead gain Weapon Focus for one of those weapons as a bonus feat. Furthermore, if you gain Weapon Focus as a bonus feat with one of your racial weapons as a result of this feat, you can change which racial weapon your bonus Weapon Focus feat applies to by engaging in 10 minutes of practice with the new weapon. The benefits of this bonus Weapon Focus feat last until you choose to practice and apply it to a different racial weapon. Greater Weapon Focus:
Prerequisites: Proficiency with selected weapon, Weapon Focus with selected weapon, base attack bonus +1, 8th-level fighter. Benefit: You gain a +1 bonus on attack rolls you make using the selected weapon. This bonus stacks with other bonuses on attack rolls, including those from Weapon Focus. Special: You can gain Greater Weapon Focus multiple times. Its effects do not stack. Each time you take the feat, it applies to a new type of weapon. ![]()
![]() Ok, so this is the situation a fighter with Greater Grapple and Hamatula Strike. He is adjacent to his foe, and spends a move action to grapple (see greater grapple). Next he decides to stab his foe with a dagger as a standard action (grapple check). Now here's where it gets weird:
So the fighter makes the grapple check (2nd time this round) Is he limited to the Hamatula Strike description or can he continue with normal grapple rules; Can he do both? ![]()
![]() theevilmonk wrote:
I must disagree with TheEvilMonk. The feat's specific rules on flanking outweigh the general rules on flanking. Benefit(s): When you and your ally who also has this feat threaten the same enemy, you’re both considered to be flanking that enemy, regardless of your actual positioning. To gain this benefit, you and your ally must be of different size categories, and your target must be the same size category as either you or your ally. If you're flanking you get a +2 to your attack rolls and can sneak attack. Now of course this feat only works if the enemy is one of two particular sizes and the ally must be a different size so this is clearly not a "I can always flank" situation. ![]()
![]() poundpuppy30 wrote: lol What if the archer used his bow as a melee weapon then would he get flanking? Sorry couldn't resist. Yes. This would be a good time to use the Bowstaff spell btw. Also if you have an Animal companion and Combat Expertise and snap shot you can get Pack Flanking which allows, RAW, flanking with a ranged weapon. You would need to be threatening, which is enabled by Snap Shot, and you'd also need to be next to your animal companion (or mounted on) and then you'd have flanking.Pack Flanking
![]()
![]() So, do I need to wait or react to something before I use the standard action to charge? It seems that I can, in effect, move into position and charge with the Rhino Charge feat but my friends are telling me I must wait for something to happen or it's not a "condition". There doesn't seem to be RAW as to what kind of conditions are valid. ![]()
![]() Lets say I have an 8th level Warrior with the Rhino Charge feat. Can this warrior move into a good charging position and then ready a charge to be used "now" so, in effect, he does a zig-zag charge? If not, why not? Rhino Charge
Normal: Charging is a full-round action and allows you to move twice your speed. ![]()
![]() An exception would be a mount with Leaping Evasion, which would IMHO share it's reflex save if successful. Leaping Evasion: "Benefit: When you succeed at a Reflex save against a spell or effect that affects an area, as an immediate action you can attempt an Acrobatics check to jump out of the effect’s area." ![]()
![]() blackbloodtroll wrote:
I don't know what you guys are talking about. "When cast on a container such as a quiver or a pouch that contains nonmagical ammunition or shuriken (including masterwork ammunition or shuriken, but not special materials, alchemical attributes, or nonmagical treatments on the ammunition) at the start of each round this spell replaces any ammunition taken from the container the round before. The ammunition taken from the container the round before vanishes. If, after casting this spell, you cast a spell that enhances projectiles, such as align weapon or greater magic weapon, on the same container, all projectiles this spell conjures are affected by that spell." http://www.d20pfsrd.com/magic/all-spells/a/abundant-ammunitionSorry dude. I would love the spell if it worked like that, but no. |