Sorry for the punctuation, ill be sure try to be as punctual (heh heh heh) as can in future posts. my apologies to all who must see it, as i'm unable to edit that post at this point. As for pfs clarifying things: They have not said anything about snowball in either the additional resources or the campaign clarifications, other than that all the spells in "People of the North" on page 26 are legal. And that all The spells in Ultimate Wilderness are legal for play (except forest's sense, grasping vine, and vine strike. but that's not relevant here.) Which leads me to believe that both are legal, because it doesn't state that we need to use one version over another another. or that one replace another.as far as
"The fully refined version will be Paizo's default version for adventures, NPC compilations, and the like moving forward"
this sounds like they are stating that paizo themselves will be using the updated version for these things from here on out. This, to me, doesn't seem to relate to what pfs should do, that's just what they will do.
So ive done most of the research already but I just want to make certain that I'm not missing anything
so what if the player were to consider that the animal companion or mount class features is similar to the familiar class feature, would the player then would he be able to play with a riding rat familiar or would it be up to someone elses interpretation as to what is similar and who would that be?
so I've been looking around and haven't found a solid awnser to this question. There's probably an obvious awnser I jus cant find. In the riding rat description it states
here's a question say a Shadow Dancer, three turns into combat, wants to disappear makes a stealth check, using hide in plain sight, succeeds and makes a a full attack using melee weapons. Does the enemy become flat-footed from this? If so is this only for the first attack or for all attacks that round? Note that the Shadow dancer is not invisible just hidden.
im not certian that this is the right place for this question,but i couldnt find a better place for it
Glorf Fei-Hung wrote:
thanks this has been very informative, ill be sure to bring this to his attention, thanks everyone :D
so in pfs i was playing a magus and had declared that i would be using spell combat. i chose to hit with my sword first, unexpectedly that killed the creature. i decided that would be the end of my turn since the other enemys were too far away but the gm said that because i had declared spell combat that i was required to cast a spell now.