![]() ![]()
![]() Are we still doing this?
![]()
![]() doc the grey wrote: ... Remember only Nyartholotep and Shub are actually solid evil outer gods we've seen yet so somewhere, in the depths of space there could be good followers *eyes trail off to look at the flumphs*. Hmm..., if we look at the entire Cthulhu pantheon, and how Lovecraft handled them, I see all the Outer Gods as being a form of Chaotic Neutral so far off the chart that while they sit at the table, Good, Evil, Lawful, and what we call Chaotic are all just sitting on the same dinner plate waiting to be mixed together with a fork. Maybe we invent a new alignment for them. "Insanely Weird" perhaps? In my mind, a true Cthonic breach is one of the few things that would bring demons, devils and angels to the same side of the battle. There's no such thing as Good and Evil if reality itself goes. So yeah, let's authorize them! :) ![]()
![]() Emmit Svenson wrote: Take the fighter aside. Tell him you'd like him to play the role of Samwise Gamgee in the Frodo/Gollum/Sam menage a trois that you see coming. This might frame things in a way that will make the game palatable for him. Dude, I was SO reading through hoping no one else had seen that obvious connection so I could post it. Dang it! ![]()
![]() Evan Whitefield wrote:
Not sure what a store liaison is but it sounds like work. Ditto for printing stuff out for them. :) GMing for Venture Officers sounds like a good way to show exactly how little you belong in that chair. I got them $50 Paizo gift certs. They can liaison for themselves. ;) ![]()
![]() Doug Miles wrote:
Good enough. Venture Captain is Kelly Youngblood of Houston. He ran three days of PFS gaming at Owlcon without any major hiccups (no problems = lots of work!) and bent over backwards to make sure everyone got into the games they wanted. Lots of happy players, me included! A well run con is a fine thing to see. Venture Lieutenant is Marc Vanderbrink of Houston. Along with assisting Kelly, I think he GMed every slot and absolutely persecuted my older son's character for (I think) three of them. I realized just how insightfully genius that was when I noticed how big my son's grin was as he recounted how many times over he technically should have died. Major kudos for personalizing his gaming experience. ![]()
![]() bugleyman wrote:
ABSOLUTELY! Every time I see silly stuff on the chronicle sheet I think exactly the same thing. Also, I can see the 'logic' that what you see is what you came across, whether it makes sense or not. Unfortunately that's only logical from a GM/Game Designer POV.Now from the players' POV: "Yeah! Lot's of work and blood but we did it and I'm stoked! What cool stuff do I now have access to buy?... +1 Cloak? Seriously? Well, maybe it costs less... no? Dude, why bother wasting the ink to print it?" Now, would game balance truly be affected if 'found' items were available for 50% off? ...as long as it was for everyone? That's a lot, yes. But all of a sudden finding things is actually important! You know, like in the home games. :) ![]()
![]() savokk wrote: This brings up a question I have had for awhile. Scenario: One PC gives a 2nd PC a potion, the potion is used during the scenario. At the end of the scenario the 2nd PCs buys the same potion and wants to give it to the first PC. (I said this wasn't allowed, and explain why). The 2nd PC says that he would still buy it and cross it off his chronicle sheet as used and the 1st PC would not cross the potion off his sheet (essentially, the PCs exchanged potions, but nothing changed on chronicles). My initial reaction was to not allow this either; but in the spirit of Pathfinder cooperation, I did. It hasn't come up since but I'm wondering if I handled this correctly. I also wonder if there is an official way for players to replace items they used that belong to another player. I have only GM'd low tier scenarios, but I could see this being a bigger issue once you run into higher level potions/scrolls. The best logic I've seen applied to this says that as long as PC #2 buys the same item, 'returning' the loaned/used potion/scroll to PC #1 before the end of the scenario, PC #2 simply bought the item for and used the item on, himself! The only 'tweak' was the order in which it was done. So, as long as it's not illegal to buy and use potions, you're good. The order really shouldn't matter. ![]()
![]() Nope. If he purchased the license to Pathfinder material through Hero Labs he paid his money and Paizo got some of it! That satisfies the "pay to play" thing you've got going. (And don't assume it's all that cheap. They get a decent cut.) I fully understand your urge to support the system and the vendor. But just because I can afford both Hero Lab licenses and the books doesn't mean I feel the next guy has to. I bought the books with almost the same sense of reverential respect that you seem to have for the vendor and the game. And I'll loan my books to anyone who needs one at a session. You're right. You don't have to police it. And I think everyone appreciates that. |