Arueshalae

NinjaPirateBob's page

Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber. Organized Play Member. 9 posts. No reviews. No lists. 1 wishlist. 1 Organized Play character.


RSS

Dark Archive

Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

We ran into this situation last night and I'm trying to get a better clarification. I have a normal animal companion and we had to make a save vs confusion. I passed but my companion failed. Does my companion act confused on my turn even if I don't spend an action to command it and give it it's own actions? Am I forced to give it 2 actions to play out the confusion?

From the rules it seems like I could just not give it an action and let the confusion duration run out while I do my own things but it doesn't fit with what's going on in the moment and breaks immersion by relying on mechanics to do what essentially feels like cheating. The way we ruled it is I could act normally and my companion still makes a confusion roll and if it's something other than "act normally" they take that action without being commanded (my scorpion attacked the closest player unfortunately).

I would love to hear some opinions and specifically from a Developer about this niche situation. Our table will probably stick with the ruling we made no matter what because it makes the most sense from a narrative point of view but I'm still curious what everyone else thinks.

Dark Archive

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Nobody is perfect, but it takes a good person to admit their shortcomings and attempt to make amends. I have a lot of respect for Erik Mona and he seems like such a cool guy from all the times I listened to him on the Glass Cannon Podcast and I'm glad they addressed the matter and told everyone "we hear you and we will do better". That's all you can ask from people.

Dark Archive

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Star Wars rpg using the Starfinder ruleset and announced the week of the final movie coming out. Obviously I have no idea and I’m just enjoying all the speculation and theories around something that we as a community may have hyped up more than it needed to be lol

Dark Archive

Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Something came up at our table. Freedom of Movement says “The target ignores effects that would give them a circumstance penalty to Speed.” The grabbed condition says that it gives you the immobilized condition. Would that be considered a penalty to speed? Freedom of Movement use to be a little more explicit in its wording but now we don’t know if it’s a useful spell vs creatures with grappling abilities. I know if we’re grabbed we can succeed using an escape action without rolling but it seems like a huge downgrade in utility from what it used to be for a 4th level spell. I hope I can get a dev to clarify the exact interaction with the grabbed condition.

Dark Archive

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I love the upgraded heal spell and the fact that the 2-action version gets a range and +8 onto the roll per spell level. But what about the Harm spell for us morally questionable Clerics? All we get is the range but no other benefit for the 2-action version. I’m ok with it not being a full 8 points per spell level but maybe 2-4 points per level to help us out a bit? It feels like the two clerics are not equal when presented with the same rules which doesn’t feel right. Even if it’s an “under the hood” type of balance it isn’t presented in a way that makes it feel like it is. Heal and Harm have always been 2 sides of the same coin, which still looks like they wanted to keep it that way with the Healing Hands and Harming Hands feat, but why no added bonus for Harm when Heal gets a huge one? Basically an extra maximized die per spell level.

Dark Archive

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I would also love to throw my hat in for a Cheliax book! But I also realy want a Tian Xia book first since I have enough Cheliax to whet my appetite for now...

Dark Archive

Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I'm so excited for this! I'm also hoping that it gets enough attention to let the company know that we are all for some shorter AP's that start at higher levels. I would love to see a 12-18 AP dealing with some of the crazy stuff in the universe!

Dark Archive

Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

The way I interpreted it is you polarize for your weapon only but each attack after the first before the start of your next turn adds the polarization damage as a cumulative effect. If you had polarize +1d6 the first attack is normal, the second attack is +1d6, if you get 4 attacks and hit all of them (like an Operative) that would be +2d6 then +3d6, then they provoke an AoO so that is +4d6. Then your polarization for your own weapon wears off at the beginning of your next turn where it starts over.

Dark Archive

Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

So I know there's an official Roll20 Character sheet for Starfinder now but I've heard rumors that there may be a compendium coming also which would be nice. Since you're releasing Pathfinder adventure modules built on there is there any chance you guys will be working with them to bring some Starfinder adventure modules to Roll20? I would really like to play more of the adventures paths but converting them manually for use on there is very time consuming and subpar given my skill and amount of prep time allotted after responsibilities.