![]()
![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Pixel Popper wrote: I've played a N leaning NE Aasimar Thief that resented the impression that his parentage should somehow determine his goodness... reminds me of the first major villain of rise of the runelords is an assimar cultist of lamassu who resented the expectations and assumptions people placed on her by the nature of her birth ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() yeah, i think two boosts + free + flaw makes the most sense as the standard going forward now that it can more easily be said to represent trends and expectations rather than something that is mechanically enforced and requires unorthodox members of an ancestor to jump through hoops to achieve their idea. whereas +boost+free is literally just flavor text for all intents and purposes post errata. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() keftiu wrote:
I just miss and where monk weapons included basically all swords spears and polearms ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() On the point of barbarian, the word barbarian was a general-purpose word for foreigner in classical greek, it was derogatory yes but it was applied to literally everyone who did not speak greek from slavs to Persians to Egyptians to Berbers to Romans, and as such didn't really have any stereotype associated with it implicitly other than a general sense of superiority and being more cultured than such people. the modern imagery for barbarian comes from writings regarding the sacking of Rome, with "barbarians at the gates" using an at the time utterly archaic greek word because at the time writing things down in prose reminiscent of archaic greek writing was how authors of the time showed how cultured and sophisticated they where much like Latin was in the middle ages. from there it was adopted into several germanic and romance languages, generally used to refer to invaders or other foreign threats, generally with again a connotation of superiority over them. Anyway, long story short, while the term is defiantly derogatory I don't think I would consider it a slur because it is not associated with any specific group, but is rather simply an insult. anyway back to the question at hand, I think the answer is one should have both specific and generic classes to cover both broader ideas and more focused concepts. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() aobst128 wrote: I never could follow the anti blaster rhetoric. Seems fine to me. the issue with blasters is two-fold, they just fall apart against severe solo bosses that they ap's love throwing at you, and two, they lack staying power; if you want blasting to be your game plan you will run out of relevant spell slots alarmingly quick and be forced to fall back on low-level utility and control spells which are precisely the sort of spells people who want blasters don't care to use. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() D3stro 2119 wrote:
baba Yaga is.... incredibly inconsistent in folklore, in some she is a human witch, in others closer to a fae being, a spirit of the forest, and in others still closer to an old god with dementia, she is sometimes a monster, and a villain, sometimes a trickster, sometimes she is a wise mentor and sometimes she tests the hero to determine their worth, her power ranges from "old lady with strength like iron and flying pestle" to complete dominion over the iron forest and can see prophecies and fate. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Sanityfaerie wrote:
based on my reading the Nephilim were basically only born very very early on and living Nephilim are descendants of those original pairings, these offspring were deemed aberrant and cursed to inspire hostility in others, leading to them being largely hunted down both by mortals, and some other gods, as such they live secretive isolationist lives to avoid endangering their people by causing conflict. they are also 11 feet tall ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Benjamin Medrano wrote: I'm sorry, but in a thread about what we want from mythic (yes, it says stories, but I consider it more general), saying 'why not just start at higher level' is pretty danged insulting from my point of view. explain to me the difference between a level 1 character with mithic powers, and a level 5 character? like, "I am mythic but there are hundreds of normal people better than me in every way" does not seem like something that makes sense. And The Raven Black was saying that they would like to have low level mythic to utilize incredible abilities from the start of the game... which is doable by just starting at a higher level. if mythic is at all related to power, having it start anywhere but end game doesn't make any sense to me because the powerlevel you are looking for... already exists. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() The Raven Black wrote:
so play in a campaign that starts at a higher level? Its worth noting that level is a mechanical abstraction for the convenience of the system and the fact that adventurers usually start at one is more for character creation ease than anything, this is not something that actually "exists" in golation, people starting off do not default to level one and grow in 20 measurable incriments anymore than hp is a measurable metric. having more powerful abilities at lower level so you can fight more powerful things just makes you higher level. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Jedi Maester wrote:
I suspect synthasist summoner where the summon is a transformation rather than a separate body would be good at filling that role, once that class archetype actually exists at least ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() So some time ago, I did a write-up on my conversion of the Abysians/Lavaborn as well as the early age of Arcoscephale from dominions, and I had intended to do conversions for that game but quickly got distracted, I am now motivated to pick it back up and while I can make no promises to convert the whole game, I can at least provide everyone with a few new nations to slot into their world Before we start a summary of Dominions for context, the conceit of the game is that the head god of all creation has up and vanished without a trace. Before too long every nation of the world has its pet pretender to the throne viewing for the title of head god. These pretenders range from archmages to ancient heroes, to giant monsters from before time, to old allies, generals, or lovers of the previous head god. the game takes place over three ages, and many of the nations I will convert will have separate entries for each age. 1. the early age: In this era, the world is young and wild, the world is full of monsters, magic, and a lot fewer people. People of this era are armed largely with bronze or basic iron, and have a weak understanding of the magic that fills the world around them,
This of course has little bearing on any use in an actual pathfinder game, I'm more just giving it as context for the world these nations come from, so context out of the way, let's move on to Early Age Xibalba, "Vigil of the Sun" a nation based on Aztec and Mayan culture and specifically the Mayan underworld. and it's god Camaztoz.
Ancestry
- Seek to live out the glory of your people's folk tales as a guide and ambassador to celestial objects.
Others Might
Physical Description
Alignment and Religion
Adventurers
Names
Level 1 Ancestory Feats
Level 5 Ancestory Feats
Level 9 Ancestory Feats
Level 13 Ancestory Feats
Level 17 Ancestory Feats
feel free to leave feedback this was very much eyeballed and at least some part of it is almost certainly badly worded and imbalanced
Items
Creature
Characters
NPC
Archetypes
![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Sanityfaerie wrote:
that they look like conspiricy theory reptilians and absolutely nothing like snakes? ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() PossibleCabbage wrote:
I think skills package, with divine focus spells and the ability to use divine scrolls/wands/staves (but not actual spell slots) is the way to go ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() my "alchemist fix" has a few moving parts, while we are sharing things we would like to see. 1) Organized alchemy, at level 1 an alchemist can draw any alchemical item as part of an action to activate, strike with or toss it (see below) 2)Alchemical alacrity (complete rework)
3+4) General action
Catch (R)
do i think this is likely? no but it has made alchemist a million times more dynamic in my games. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Guntermench wrote: Fair, but they're also the only ones that can fight at range underwater without a feat. that is like, the most microscopic of niches, like i think in all my years of playing dnd and dnd ajacent games, there have only been two battles where that would even be helpful, one against sahuagin raiders who where dragging people underwater, and another where there was a krakken attacking a ship from below the surface. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() but they dont "avenge" the faithful, they are spies and assassins and sabatiours, who cut away problems for their deity. you have to remember that in golarion religion is not a communal cultural thing, many households have worshipers of all different gods let alone towns, it is a relationship of respect and duty between the worshiper and the god. it is not faith at all, it is obediance ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() the biggest thing i want, and my go to homebrew for alchemests is making it a free action to draw an alchemical item, not just bombs, and not as a feat but backed in level one feature, you dont need to use extra actions to get your options out ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() keftiu wrote:
animism is still.... religion though? Religions do not need gods to be religions ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Unicore wrote: I guess you are saying the ability itself wouldn't work because the golem is immune to magic? I mean, striking runes are magical too but I have never seen a GM rule those out. striking runes enhance a weapon, a golem is not immune to them the same way they are not immune to the extra strike given by a haste spell, because they aren't the thing the magic is even impacting, whereas extract element is an explicitly magical action that targets the golem, thus they would no-sell it as written Edit: I think what we are learning here is that golem antimagic wasnt the best thought out ability from a future proofing perspective ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Sanityfaerie wrote: .... so what you are suggesting is that kineticists should be allowed, if they give up their utility, and aoe feats and any real hope of ever taking an archetype, to be granted the option of being a worse fighter with a shortbow and 0 bow feats, am i understanding correctly? this would actually be a somewhat amusing outcome since shortbow fighter out damaged a focused blaster kineticist at all levels post like... 3 in pf1 too ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() beowulf99 wrote:
because runed knuckle dusters would not boost your blasts? ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() on the subject of "respectful" shamans who would they even be respectful to? based on what I've read the term originally referred to religious figures in Siberia, Mongolia and associated areas but has since been applied to native Americans from Inuit through to indigenous beliefs in Peru, not to mention aboriginal priests in Australia, and spitualists in Africa and through the Indian ocean. Other than a general belief in spirits these groups have basically nothing in common that you could use as a basis to ground what a Golarion shaman is. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Dubious Scholar wrote:
not really? like the alternative is to pretend that impulses are just not magical effects? the only way i can interpret this as not being the case is if we pretend that "magical effects" is just a bit of flavor text and it only explicitly applies to spells, which is... unlikely. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Dubious Scholar wrote: I think it's safe to say that it would be bad if Golems were just... immune to kineticists basically. it would absolutely be bad, however i dont see any other way to interperate it, "A golem is immune to spells and magical abilities other than its own" and elemental blast is explicitly a "magical ability" ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() AdrasteiaLea wrote: Simple question. Impulses are magical, Golem magic immunity will make all of theair blasts useless correct? that is my reading, yes, golem antimagic is a bit... ill defined in some cases (such as weapon runes) but since impulses are a unique magical action that explicitly gets countered by things that counter spells, they almost certanly count ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() So since i will be on vacation for most of next week and will not have time to do any more playtests I want to go over my overall evaluation of the kineticists based on the playtests ive run compared to my initial thoughts here https://paizo.com/threads/rzs43nul?Collecting-my-thoughts The class is really cool and has a lot of things going for it, but it also has some pretty substantial flaws, both overall and with certain options. going over the latter first. Flame eruption is just worse than all the other early overflows for no good reason, bad damage, bad scaling bad aoe, its just... bad compared to tidal hands, areal boomerang or tremor. also the water critical is just awful, since while splash is valuable, you can never plan for your crit so the chance of it doing more than 1-4 more damage on your target is just luck. onto deeper problems, this class seems to want to be mobile a lot of its impulses are centered on the kineticist and ideally you want to be bouncing around the map to get into position however they don't have the action economy to do this at all, their offensive overflow impulses are all at least 2+1 actions leading to awkward gaps after you reposition since you have a remarkable lack of one action options leaving you nothing to do but blast, which leads us to the second problem. Elemental blast kind of sucks, it is just a series of 8 unimpressive martial weapons, fire and air at least have unique attributes but earth and especially water just have nothing going for them that makes the blast interesting to use. Sure they can switch from melee to ranged but the only difference here is that melee does like 2 more damage since you cant afford to invest heavily in strength, and air, oh god that d4 hurts. Can you imagine how sad it made my level 6 players when they crit a high level enemy and got all of 8 damage out of it? The fact that they rely on the same gather elements as your impulses also leads clunkier turns than they need to be. AOO is also a concern but none of the adventure combats i used had aoo in them, so i cant comment how big an issue it is in practice. overmore, more than any other class i feel kineticist lives or dies by the encounter they find themselves in. Are they in a moderate counter with a ton of -3s or -4s? the kineticist will feast. even if they are against a small group of on or above level characters with low reflex they can have a good time. but if they are against a small group with even moderate reflex, or any single character at all, they just feel worthless since you cannot target other saves meaningfully, and your already low damage gets halved more often then not, and if you are against a solo boss who happens to have high reflex? well at that point the kineticist cannot really do anything at all, which leads me into the biggest point The damage across the board just isn't good enough, stunning revelation i know but past the very early levels the kineticist will struggle more and more as their damage output lags behind increased enemy hp. now this is true of all classes but the fact that in the time it takes a kineticist to gain between 2.5 to 4.5 damage when using a 3 damage impulse foes have gained 40ish hp its just a feels bad moment when you use your tidal hands, and all three enemies save, taking 9 damage each an doing nothing to actually get them killed any faster. Now this is not to say I dislike the class, as i said in my previous review the class is cool as hell and a lot of its abilities FEEL good its just you play everything out and realize that at the end of all your cool s$+@ you haven't actually accomplished much of anything. And as for the hot button topic of blasting, in addition to the general injection of interesting that generic blasts need, i hope that we end up with a selection of single target overflow impulses so that kineticists can really go all in on blowing up that one guys face. I am concerned with the kineticist in its current state but hopeful that paizo can salvage it into something that could become one of my favorite classes. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Captain Morgan wrote:
yeah if you could single target it would be good and if it was no map it would be good but as is i just dont ever see myself spending a feat on it ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Unicore wrote:
chain blast i get but barrage blast? like sure it is a free third attack but how often will that third -10 map attack actually manifest into damage? ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Ravingdork wrote:
Squiggit wrote: I would not be surprised if the release kineticist comes with a minor damage bump and improvement to their core combat loop that makes them more competitive at striking like pretty much every single playtested martial has gotten so far. i would not be surprised by either of these either but i REALLY hope this is not how the class goes ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Captain Morgan wrote:
er kineticists have the worst damage output a martial could have and still be a martial. I know that sounds hyperbollic but it is really not. they have "low accuracy" (only half the time so not a huge deal but still noteworthy) they struggle to invest in str to do damage without grabbing medium armor from outside their class so their flat damage is low. They are restricted to the one hand damage dice sizes, and the two that are d8 are incredibly bland as weapons. They can get ranged attacks that key off str which is cool and unique but again the tools to invest in str do not exist within the class itself. saying that they are only a couple points behind is implying that sneak attack, or fighter accuracy, or esoteric enhancment, or divse a stratagem, or hunters edge or rage or your choice of accuracy or damage booster that literally every other martial has only constitute "a couple points of damage" Hell, untill level 13 bomber alchemist will outdamage a kineticist strike for strike since they can add their key stat to damage (ish) and do not have to compromise defense to maintain their accuracy.![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Sanityfaerie wrote:
um... "Bestial Rage (Instinct Ability) ......Your Rage action gains the morph, primal, and transmutation traits."![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Captain Morgan wrote:
element blast comes online at level 10, I am legitimatly unsure what you are talking about with the sustained 3d6 ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Gaulin wrote: I really don't understand where this notion came from that kineticists were going to be the savior of blasting in 2e. They weren't better blasters than full casters in 1e, not by a long shot. Expecting them to be *the* blaster of 2e is something the community made up. because blasting was the core thing they did in pf1, they werent the best at it, but it was there thing, and that is a niche that pf2e is lacking. so in a more balanced game like pf2e, it makes sense to expect that to be the niche they fill and for them to be good at it. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Temperans wrote:
please no, we went through the times of monsters covered in "spell like abilities" already, i dont want to go back ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() TheWayofPie wrote: I don’t like that CON makes this class the worst at skills while also not being very accurate or damaging at all. That’s just really weird to me. its not even good at con things, at its very best apex item and all, it has the same hp as what you would expect a normal fighter to end up on, ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() i wish my experiance mirrored yours unicore, from everything i have seen in my playtests, i have found kineticitst to just be doing everything badly, (two level 6 kineticists, one dual air fire dex man, the other dedicated earth str man) they do an awful lot of stuff badly, save for the one impulse they get off at the start of a fight before enemies can all run and get tangled into your front line. I know that the utility impulses do get very good later on, and i do like that part of the class, and my dual air fire guy would have benifited from picking up fair winds, but my players felt like they got to do "cool kineticst thing" once per fight and after that they where just sub par at everything ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Unicore wrote:
evocation wizard, elemental sorcerer druid of any kind (elementalist is largely a downgrade) are all kind of.... bad at single target damage, since that is something that casters are supposed to be bad at so they dont eat martials pie, OW psychic is better in that regard but it is both the completely wrong asthetic for someone who wants to play a pure black mage, and is very limited in what elemental options it has acess to. you can already "emulate" a what I want with a flurry ranger, a shortbow and your choice of elemental rune, this has the same mechanical impact of what i want so saying that "it is an invalid design principle" doesnt make any sense, lightning ranger just has the completely wrong asthetic and feel ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() PossibleCabbage wrote:
yes but all of those can use their key stat to improve their accuracy or damage in some way, if a kineticist doesnt grab dc impulses (unlikely but plausible), their key stat litteraly does nothing edit apparently alchemist is just bomber in my brain, ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() GrayDeath666 wrote: I prefer a multi charge system with some of the low level feats being "do a thing" gain a charge. Then have Impulse feats be a place to dump charges for an effect. It would give a balance between single target stuff, utility, and AoE things. Would also feel like you are opening your gatte wider and wider until you simply let it flow into your opponent to (hopefully) devastating effect. thats probobly a bit too complecated to be realistically implement ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() EberronHoward wrote: I think the Kineticist *feels* really good. I look at the flavour of the class and the actions it can do, and it makes me happy. Paizo nailed that. But for every win in the flavour column, there's a failure in the mechanics department. My group is having second thoughts about playtesting the class because the mechanical problems are so glaring. It feels like the playtest package needs an update to get the obvious-problems out of the way, so that we can comment on the non-obvious ones. yeah i feel like it is so easy to see the bad damage, the struggles of a str build without reaching outside the class for med armor, and the clunky action economy for a low reward that any more subtle problems there might be are getting lost in the fog, as it i feel like the ideas are good and the numbers are not, but i would have to play with a version that has good numbers to really sus that out ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() WWHsmackdown wrote: I'd prefer having the playtest kineticist with numbers bumped slightly up (not too much better than a cantrip) over having a focus power class that's markedly stronger. The playtest mechanics we have are interesting and thematic, they just need a little polish I still stand by the idea that they should make gathered elements a "two handed" """weapon""" and scale it accordingly both for blasts and impulses, if blasts where d6-d10, and base impulses where rolling d6-d8 or d8-d10 with the same cantrip scaling that would feel a lot meater without derailing into outside what is reasonable to be free, at level 20 that might be 20 more damage on average than a cantrip, but its nowhere close to being a focus or slot spell -idle thoughts![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() CorvusMask wrote:
does this mean that if a mage picks up snarecrafter there is an ability that calls for a dc that does not exist? ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() GrayDeath666 wrote: I kind of like the idea floated around here of gathering multiple charges but I would add to it and make the scaling of overflow abilities depend on how many charges you spent. I would also make overflow basically just say can spend charges instead of just losing all of them. Finally I would set a limit to the charges that uses level. yeah "gather elements" sounds like it should entail charging up, rather than "slightly different draw weapon" ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Perpdepog wrote:
i mean that helps out with fire but like, im not sure i would take immunity to [air] effects even as a level 1 feat ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() a ribbon is a flavor ability that is designed to play into a classes thematic identity rather than something that adds thematic weight, you are probobly see it used in refrance to adapt element, which is full of thematic options, very few of which are especially useful
|