Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Richard Lowe wrote: Hopefully the changes will both mean Paizo doesn't have to worry about keeping the lights on at all (not saying that they were of course) and that they can more easily offer their staff improved wages that properly represent their value as the people who create all of the awesome things they're able to offer. If so then this is excellent news and I'm certainly happy to see it (though I imagine that out of all that the bounties moving to $5 might be a bit hard for some to swallow in all honesty). I'm with you friendo!
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
I've been rebuilding Skaven the Halfling lvl 7 evoker and it looks as if the natural armor and deflection bonuses from the magic adjustment tab are not being calculated on the front sheet page correctly. Dex is 16 size is small, so it shows the +3 and +1 for those properly, but if I put a 2 in the box for natural armor and a 2 in deflection on the magic adj tab it calculates to an AC of 16 and flat footed AC of 13. The boxes for natural armor and deflection on the front sheet are also showing up blank. Thank you sir for an excellent tool and keeping up on bugs as well.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Excellent work. Just used it to make Skaven from the Shackled City AP. It looks like there may be a bug on the back sheet for the school powers for the wizard. This is what I get with Skaven as an Abjurer: Spoiler:
sCoregen wrote:
Seems to be a bit off, and it'd be nice if instead of all the powers in a block there was either a minimum lvl required to use them in quotes or they were added when you reached the appropriate lvl. Excellent work! Edit: Shoulda looked a bit further...there seems to be a bug with the first weapon on the combat sheet, it's not adding damage to the box, just leaving it blank. Also when I put a dagger there for Skaven the halfling, it didn't auto size in the first box, but did in the rest. Again, great work and look forward to seeing it as development progresses.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Jason Bulmahn wrote:
How about expanding the ki pool and letting the monk use ki to enhance his unarmed strike in various ways for one round, such as spend 1 ki for a +1 enhancement to all attacks as a swift action, spend 2 ki to overcome a specific type of dmg reduction (silver, cold iron, evil, etc.), spend 3 to add holy/unholy dmg and so on. Not saying that the examples I've given are a good ki point cost, just throwing something out to think about. EDIT: While I was away, it looks as if this has been suggested a time or 2, sorry 'bout that. I still think it's a good idea and wouldn't necessitate new weapons or slots.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Cosmo wrote:
No worries, crap occurs. Thanks for the reply and best of luck finding the culprit that's causing all of your extra work this month. Jason
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Erik Mona wrote:
1. No, I don't plan on converting any time soon. I'm in the middle of SCAP, plan on running the other 2 APs one day and have been very impressed with the new APs in Pathfinder. That should keep me and my group busy for some time now. 2. I will not be buying anything that is 4th edition. I do not need it Sam I Am. (yet) 3. I will continue to buy products, no matter who sells them, that support 3.5. It's the system I have the most money invested in right now and as a married with 2 kids gamer, I just flat out don't have the disposable income to throw at a new edition. Even if I did have the spare change to feed 4th edition, I wouldn't do it until my group and I had played through everything I've listed in #1. Best of luck with whatever you all decide to do Erik. I'm sure whichever way you all go that you will have a large following. You all do very nice and interesting work. I wish I could say I'd follow whatever direction you will lead, but I can not.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Matthew Morris wrote: I use transparency or as I call it, "Psionics and magic are transparent, unless it benefits the psion." I also allow spellcraft/psicraft to be used for the other and Use Psionic Device is folded into Use Magic Device. I hadn't used psionics until about a year ago, then got the XPH in a bundle of books I picked up in an eBay auction. After reading through it, checking the WoTC psionics boards, I gave it a whirl. I agree that most previous editions of psionics are broken, but with 100% transparency and making psi/spellcraft checks interchangeable, I've come to enjoy the newer system. Like any other class out there you can turn nearly any psionic character into a munchkin, but with good player/DM interaction, I like psionics, a lot, and don't think that you should automatically throw them out as a player or DM based on previous sub par versions. Who doesn't love a psionic blasting, brain munching Mind Flayer?
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Watcher! wrote: Yeah Jason, I apologize. I got busy. This evening/afternoon for sure. Thank you sir! The maps are great and will be a huge boon when I run this AP. Keep up the great work, and if you do any other maps, even if they're not associated with an AP or adventure, I'd be very interested to see them. Again, thanks!
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Dude, I am so all over this. Could it be another Expedition to the Barrier Peaks type module? That'd be freakin' sweet.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Stay 3.5 or even 3.75 and you will whole heartedly have 100% of my support, financially and vocally. I'd love to see you all give it a try, and if it don't work out for you after 2-3 years then I guess you'd be forced to convert to 4E. Either way, best of luck, and the longer you all stay 3.xx, the longer I spend my dork dollars here.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Tars Tarkas wrote: You'll get access to the amazing set of tools D&D Insider will provide-the D&D Game Table,the D&D Character Creator, and the Dungeon Master's Toolkit, details of which will be unveiled in the coming months. [rant] This is what seems to me the worst of what I'm hearing about 4E. I'm sure you've all seen folks complaining about it, but now it's my turn.I don't want to have to have a laptop in front of me to make my character or to play the game I started playing 25 years ago! Some of my fondest memories are of sitting around a table with pen, paper, dice and a stack 'o rule books BSing and making a character for the next epic adventure. I understand that WotC is in business to make money, but they are killing an icon and a part of my life that I've come to treasure will be nothing but a shade if they have their say. I've dug my heels in with the group that I run for and play with. There will be NO 4th Edition allowed. [/rant] Thank you, I feel better. :p |