Jason Bulmahn wrote: As a note, the Friday blog will be all about this podcast, adding some clarifications and behind the screen spoilers! Good, looking forward to this. But, please don't go to far down the D&D 4/5ed mentality. That is what led me to Pathfinder in the first place. Some of the proficiency ideas I completely can't stand.
As many has stated, either ninja or slayer make better PC assassins. Heck, unchained rogue would work really well, just minus the 10th lvl better death attack the others have, but plenty of offensive abilities and debuffs as well. The 1st 2 classes mentioned their assassinate ability only needs 1 round of studying vrs 3 rounds for the PrC class, but you don't get that until 10th lvl vrs 6th with the PrC.
So, I get some of the changes, clear spindle ion stones and tribal scars (help, that feat was OP). But Lore Warden? Really? Master of Many Styles is what broke a whole style chain, and made a 5/6th lvl feat available at 2/3rd if dipping, but the feat, not the archetype got blasted. Similar to a trait that broke a nice hat (that was way to cheep). I just don't think I'm a fan of how Paizo fixes issues at times, original writing of slashing grace and compare with dervish dance, both let the off hand be used with spell combat. Now only dervish dance still works with spell combat.
Yep, Canon Hawk was a mage and used what was basically a sword-spear, but shot bolts from a range. Personally I have always view the canon version of the ADS as a finesse-able katana, because yeah the primer's drawing looks like a Katana and a saber had a kid. The elven court blade was piercing or slashing, but otherwise same stats as the elven curved blade, which I have always pictured as the two handed version a scimitar, in style and shape. But yeah, in a fantasy game your personal weapon can look like whatever as long as your discription doesn't make it into a completely different weapon, ex 6ft swort-sword. |