![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Bleu Cheese Slaad |
![Blue Slaad](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/GoL41BlueSlaad.jpg)
ciretose wrote:
Bleu Cheese Slaad wrote:ciretose wrote:You mean the article written by a disgruntled ex-employee that basically accuses Vic and Lisa of killing WotC? Yeah, I've read it. And none of it makes my point any less valid or yours any more.Bleu Cheese Slaad wrote:ciretose wrote:You do know that WotC owned the name before 4th edition right? You know that they produced 3.5 right? By your logic 3.5 was only D&D because they bought the name.
WOTC, in the form of 4th edition, killed 3.5...The OP seemed to be saying that he was upset his friendly local game store was full of people who didn't realize 4e is the new kid on the block, and called DnD only because they bought the name.
I know the history.
Do you
If you don't think WoTC created 4th edition as a money grab, and you believe the way they sell books so that you need to buy them all pokemon style (pun intended) is altruistic, then you are exactly the type of customer they want.
Good job, citizen!
First off, how do you get that out of what I said? Second off, your rant still does nothing to reinforce your original argument which was that 3.5 was D&D but 4th is not because WotC bought the name prior to releasing 3.0.