Paizo Leadership Team Update

Monday, November 15, 2021

Over the last six weeks, Paizo's Leadership Team has attempted to better listen to and understand the challenges faced by its workforce, customers, and community. We want to take a moment to update you on a few important developments that have emerged from those conversations.

Before we begin, it's important to note that this update does not address requests regarding salaries, adjustments to the current work-from-home environment, or other matters that are now subject to negotiation with the United Paizo Workers union during collective bargaining.

We’re still searching diligently for a candidate to fill the company’s Human Resources Manager position, and plan to begin interviews very shortly. As this is an incredibly important hire, we want to make sure we find the right candidate with experience leading initiatives related to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging (DEIB) and working with a union. We are continuing to gather resumes as the search continues.

We’ve hired a company called Energage to complete an employee engagement survey on behalf of Paizo. This survey is designed to allow employees to provide anonymous, unfiltered, and honest feedback to the company that will help Paizo establish priorities for improvement planning. It will also serve as an important benchmark against which to measure the results of future surveys, allowing us to develop a baseline to measure against. We expect employees to be able to access the engagement survey sometime this week.

Discussion in the past several months has resurfaced two instances in which a Paizo executive mishandled user data when replying to message board posts, resulting in allegations of doxxing. These actions were contrary to Paizo policy, and corrective actions were taken to ensure that this does not happen again.

“This was a huge mistake on my part and I am deeply sorry for any issues that have arisen from these actions. This was not the right way to treat our customers and I apologize,” said Paizo President Jeff Alvarez. “As President, I know I need to hold myself to a higher standard.”

Paizo takes issues related to discrimination and harassment very seriously. We have hired the law firm of Moritt Hock & Hamroff (MH&H) to investigate allegations of discrimination against trans employees and sexual misconduct before reporting back to the Leadership Team. Investigators from the firm will reach out to members of Paizo’s staff and others that made claims on social media. Cooperation with the firm is voluntary, of course, but we remain committed to investigating these matters thoroughly to ensure a safe and respectful workplace.

We chose MH&H upon the recommendation of a consultant with expertise in matters of DEIB. MH&H has a team of attorneys that specialize in these issues, and we’re confident they’ll be able to provide an impartial analysis of the facts that we need to move forward with any corrective actions.

Because the results of these investigations are private personnel matters, Paizo will not be able to make them public. Corrective actions will be taken against any employee (including managers and executives) found to be guilty of these allegations.

It has never been Paizo’s intention to discriminate against any employee when making decisions of who to send to industry trade shows, but we see now that our room-sharing policy was based on outdated interpretations of gender, was not friendly to transgender employees, and could contribute to a perception of transphobia at the company. Paizo’s Leadership Team acknowledges the pain this caused, and we understand that we need to be better at recognizing issues where such decisions could have unintended results. We also recognize that such actions do not align with Paizo's core values, the values of its staff members, or the sentiments of diversity and inclusion expressed in Paizo products, and as such, have disappointed, angered, and confused members of our community. We believe these mistakes are not representative of who we are, or what we want the company to represent. We need to do better... and we will.

“As the person in charge of trade shows, I want to apologize to anyone that felt marginalized as a result of the convention decision-making process,” said Jeff Alvarez. “It was not our intent to discriminate against anyone, and I’m sorry.”

As previously communicated, Paizo has adopted a one-employee-per-room travel policy moving forward. Regardless of gender identity, couples will be allowed to share rooms during travel as long as both parties request it.

Paizo remains committed to maintaining a diverse, safe, and fun workplace where our employees are treated fairly and look forward to creating awesome Pathfinder and Starfinder products for many years to come. We hope that this update helps communicate that we, the Leadership Team, are doing our best to listen to and address the concerns of our community members. We believe in creating a better Paizo, and believe that transparency, communication, and accountability will be instrumental as we move forward. Thank you for your continued support of our company and our products.

Paizo Leadership Team
David, Erik, Jeff, Jim, Lisa, and Mike

More Paizo Blog.
Tags: Community Paizo Paizo Staff
951 to 982 of 982 << first < prev | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | next > last >>

14 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Pathfinder Accessories, Rulebook Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber

I just find it entertaining that when a company does decide to move in a direction that is less hurtful. Away from original story or plotlines. The people who scream the loudest that a company should do what they want to do with their own product is assuming that the company isn't doing what they want to do.

Which is it? Paizo should have the creative freedom to do as they wish, or they should do exactly as you wish because what they wish doesn't line up with what you want?

The mental gymnastics I have to do on the regular to keep up with the cognitive dissonance is mind numbing.

Paizo decided that they had a misstep. The goal of the company is to be inclusive and they understand that they far too regularly fall short. When they have their attention drawn to their short comings they will make a course correction.

The deviations from inclusion that some people here are campaigning and cheering for is basically a direct contradiction from the forward in their 2e players manual.

So what is it, you want to make a game you want, or you want to support a company and the vision that they have set out and embrace the change for inclusivity?

I mean, you can have it both ways but it makes your talking points really really hard to engage with.

Humbly,
Yoshua


2 people marked this as a favorite.

One thing is to include content warnings and making a setting in which everyone can be represented, other, very different, is deliberately removing things for the setting as to avoid offending someone. The former one is good, the latter one almost inevitably leads to to a never ending downward spiral.

Humbly,
Yawar


13 people marked this as a favorite.

Lots of great discussion here. It makes me hopeful people outside and inside Paizo want things to get better. Fingers crossed.

There seem to be some assumptions made regarding history and morality. History does not show that the further back in time you go, the less moral and more savage everybody was. It's nice to think the older human civilization gets, the more progressive and good to ourselves we are. In general, I think that's slowly happening, but that's not a straight line nor is it guaranteed. There are many bumps in the road and massive setbacks.

For example, people generally consider the Holocaust to be one of the most evil events ever and that was less than a century ago. The Atlantic slave trade was particularly devastating. We've had several genocidal wars in the last few decades. The list goes on.

Slavery in particular has a complicated history. From the different types to the various reasons slaves were used, to race or religion being a factor, etc. When going for history authenticity/realism/accuracy, what is even the target for fantasy RPGs? Medieval Europe? Good luck capturing the nuance just from this barely-scratches-the-surface wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_medieval_Europe.

What it comes down to for me is this: have you ever experienced a fantasy story and thought, "You know what this needs? More slavery."

And the idea that people have had bad experiences with assault/murder so maybe those should be out of the game as well doesn't fly. Unlike slavery, these have existed in every society in human history and have affected everybody. More importantly though, slavery has a horrible history in Paizo's home country and we are all even today benefiting from the suffering of slaves of our nation's past.

But if you really are concerned with non-slavery topics, this is exactly where lines and veils, x-card, and Monte Cook's Consent in Gaming forms shine. Everyone should use at least one of them.

Silver Crusade

8 people marked this as a favorite.
drumlord wrote:


But if you really are concerned with non-slavery topics, this is exactly where lines and veils, x-card, and Monte Cook's Consent in Gaming forms shine. Everyone should use at least one of them

I think that this is really the bottom line.

You (hopefully) know your own group and its limits. If not, you can ask. So, in a home campaign pretty much anything goes AS LONG AS EVERYBODY AGREES TO IT. Yes, that means there are likely quite a few home games that I would not be comfortable with. Thats fine.

But Paizo (and especially PFS) has to aim for something closer to what is universally acceptable to everybody. Given that the game is still fundamentally about magic, weird religions, violence in (hopefully) a good cause etc there are quite strict limits on how universally acceptable a game they can make. Pathfinder is PG-13 by its very nature (note, there are other RPGS that HAVE eliminated violence, that can be played by younger children. Pathfinder is just not one of those games).

So its entirely reasonable that Golarion doesn't emphasize all the bad things that exist. There are still enough bad things happening. I think it is entirely reasonable that their goal be "the world should be fine for mature 13 year olds".

They're not eliminating bad things from their setting. They've just decided that some things are NOT what they're going to be telling stories about and they're not going to actively support.

To take an analogy, only a few people criticizes Jane Austen because she doesn't concentrate (or really talk at all about) all the social problems of early 19th century England. That is not what her stories are about.

And few people object to a modern murder mystery if it does NOT mention Global Warming, or Covid, as being far greater threats than a murderer is.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
pauljathome wrote:
drumlord wrote:


But if you really are concerned with non-slavery topics, this is exactly where lines and veils, x-card, and Monte Cook's Consent in Gaming forms shine. Everyone should use at least one of them

I think that this is really the bottom line.

You (hopefully) know your own group and its limits. If not, you can ask. So, in a home campaign pretty much anything goes AS LONG AS EVERYBODY AGREES TO IT. Yes, that means there are likely quite a few home games that I would not be comfortable with. Thats fine.

But Paizo (and especially PFS) has to aim for something closer to what is universally acceptable to everybody. Given that the game is still fundamentally about magic, weird religions, violence in (hopefully) a good cause etc there are quite strict limits on how universally acceptable a game they can make. Pathfinder is PG-13 by its very nature (note, there are other RPGS that HAVE eliminated violence, that can be played by younger children. Pathfinder is just not one of those games).
....

Really well put. I'd echo Erik on this again:

Erik Mona wrote:

So while I suspect the word may come up a time or two in the future, we're just not going to be covering it going forward. A few in-production items might reference it still, but it's no longer going to be a notable part of the Golarion campaign setting.

If you want to write a big adventure where people burn Okeno to the ground to have it all make sense within the fiction of the campaign world, you are free to do so.

But we are not going to.

If you want to run Against the Slave Lords, by all means, its your table. But Paizo wont be publishing content to that effect. Not sure what the concern trolling is about.

Every DM is a creative story teller, its up to you to decide what you do at your table. Even if you're in the wrong about what you present.

Customer Service Representative

5 people marked this as a favorite.

I'm going to go ahead and lock this thread as it has gone wildly off topic. We will open a new thread when there is another update.

951 to 982 of 982 << first < prev | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Paizo / General Discussion / Paizo Blog: Paizo Leadership Team Update All Messageboards
Recent threads in General Discussion