Revenge of the Son of the FAQ Attack!

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

It’s back, and it wants revenge!

Inappropriately Sized Firearms (Ultimate Combat, page 136): Does this allow a Medium or smaller creature to use larger firearms of any size?

The text of the rule is, "The size of a firearm never affects how many hands you need to use to shoot it." The intent of that rule was to prevent a Medium character from using a Small rifle as a one-handed pistol; it wasn’t intended to let a Medium character use a Large, Huge, Gargantuan, or Colossal two-handed firearm as a two-handed weapon. Just like with non-firearms, a creature cannot wield a weapon that’s far too big or small for it. Specifically in the case of firearms, a Medium character can’t use a two-handed firearm sized for a Large or larger creature, and a Small character can’t use a two-handed firearm sized for a Medium or larger creature.

Pounce (Bestiary, page 302): If have this ability, can I make iterative attacks with weapons as part of my full attack?

Any attack sequence you can perform as a full attack is allowed as part of the charge-pounce-full attack. For example, a barbarian with the greater beast totem rage power gains pounce universal monster ability and could make iterative attacks with manufactured weapons as part of her charge-pounce-full attack.

Spell Combat (Ultimate Magic, page 10): Can a magus use this ability with cantrips?

Yes. It is not limited to spells of level 1 or higher.

Rage Mutagen (Ultimate Combat, page 25): Is the Strength bonus for this archetype ability in addition to the normal bonus for a Strength mutagen?

No, the +6 replaces the normal +4 Strength bonus of the alchemist’s Strength mutagen. This will be clarified in a future printing of Ultimate Combat.

Page 25—In the Ragechemist archetype, in the Rage Mutagen class feature, change the first sentence to read as follows:

"At 2nd level, whenever a ragechemist creates a mutagen that improves his Strength, that mutagen’s bonus to Strength increases by +2 and penalizes the alchemist’s Intelligence score."

Sean K Reynolds
Designer

More Paizo Blog.
Tags: Frequently Asked Questions Pathfinder Roleplaying Game
201 to 211 of 211 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>

Sebastian Hirsch wrote:
Starbuck_II wrote:
Quote:


Inappropriately Sized Firearms (Ultimate Combat, page 136): Does this allow a Medium or smaller creature to use larger firearms of any size?

The text of the rule is, "The size of a firearm never affects how many hands you need to use to shoot it." The intent of that rule was to prevent a Medium character from using a Small rifle as a one-handed pistol; it wasn’t intended to let a Medium character use a Large, Huge, Gargantuan, or Colossal two-handed firearm as a two-handed weapon. Just like with non-firearms, a creature cannot wield a weapon that’s far too big or small for it. Specifically in the case of firearms, a Medium character can’t use a two-handed firearm sized for a Large or larger creature, and a Small character can’t use a two-handed firearm sized for a Medium or larger creature.

So, the intent is not what they wrote. He never changed the wording, he just said this wasn't the intent.

So he since he didn't change the wording the quote, "The size of a firearm never affects how many hands you need to use to shoot it" means ignoe what he says.

He wrote " Just like with non-firearms, a creature cannot wield a weapon that’s far too big or small for it. " That should settle it.

If one of my players ever insisted on it, well 20 kobold gunslingers with giant guns aren't that funny.

But he never changed the line: "The size of a firearm never affects how many hands you need to use to shoot it". Thus you can wield a gargantuan rifle as a meduim creature.

If he wished it to not work he should say ignore the line in the book. But he didn't.


Many times the FAQ will just give intent. Later on they will errata it. Errata's are posted all at once, not individually, but until errata is posted most GM's are happy knowing intent.


wraithstrike wrote:
Many times the FAQ will just give intent. Later on they will errata it. Errata's are posted all at once, not individually, but until errata is posted most GM's are happy knowing intent.

those rules never say you can use a large two handed gun. They say the size doesn't change the mount of hands. The core rules about over sized weapons still apply. Case closed.


Starbuck_II wrote:
Sebastian Hirsch wrote:
Starbuck_II wrote:
Quote:


Inappropriately Sized Firearms (Ultimate Combat, page 136): Does this allow a Medium or smaller creature to use larger firearms of any size?

The text of the rule is, "The size of a firearm never affects how many hands you need to use to shoot it." The intent of that rule was to prevent a Medium character from using a Small rifle as a one-handed pistol; it wasn’t intended to let a Medium character use a Large, Huge, Gargantuan, or Colossal two-handed firearm as a two-handed weapon. Just like with non-firearms, a creature cannot wield a weapon that’s far too big or small for it. Specifically in the case of firearms, a Medium character can’t use a two-handed firearm sized for a Large or larger creature, and a Small character can’t use a two-handed firearm sized for a Medium or larger creature.

So, the intent is not what they wrote. He never changed the wording, he just said this wasn't the intent.

So he since he didn't change the wording the quote, "The size of a firearm never affects how many hands you need to use to shoot it" means ignoe what he says.

He wrote " Just like with non-firearms, a creature cannot wield a weapon that’s far too big or small for it. " That should settle it.

If one of my players ever insisted on it, well 20 kobold gunslingers with giant guns aren't that funny.

But he never changed the line: "The size of a firearm never affects how many hands you need to use to shoot it". Thus you can wield a gargantuan rifle as a meduim creature.

If he wished it to not work he should say ignore the line in the book. But he didn't.

Holy moly, man, he just said you can not wield a two-handed firearm of any size larger than you at all, how do you read that as you can?

I can't believe I have to quote something from the top of the page we are reading, but:

Sean K. Reynolds wrote:

Inappropriately Sized Firearms (Ultimate Combat, page 136): Does this allow a Medium or smaller creature to use larger firearms of any size?

The text of the rule is, "The size of a firearm never affects how many hands you need to use to shoot it." The intent of that rule was to prevent a Medium character from using a Small rifle as a one-handed pistol; it wasn’t intended to let a Medium character use a Large, Huge, Gargantuan, or Colossal two-handed firearm as a two-handed weapon. Just like with non-firearms, a creature cannot wield a weapon that’s far too big or small for it. Specifically in the case of firearms, a Medium character can’t use a two-handed firearm sized for a Large or larger creature, and a Small character can’t use a two-handed firearm sized for a Medium or larger creature.


He is trying to say the book overrules the devs.


ATron9000 wrote:
wraithstrike wrote:
Many times the FAQ will just give intent. Later on they will errata it. Errata's are posted all at once, not individually, but until errata is posted most GM's are happy knowing intent.
those rules never say you can use a large two handed gun. They say the size doesn't change the mount of hands. The core rules about over sized weapons still apply. Case closed.

You are preachin' to the choir.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
wraithstrike wrote:
He is trying to say the book overrules the devs.

As you know, and others seem unable to grasp, the book and the devs agree, but some people just don't seem to understand the English language. Such a sad commentary on education in the 21st century.


Starbuck_II wrote:
But he never changed the line: "The size of a firearm never affects how many hands you need to use to shoot it".

It's a good thing the restriction against weilding a larger-than-medium two-handed weapon isn't based on the number of hands you need to shoot it -- it's based on the fact that you can't wield a larger-than-medium two-handed weapon. Those are the rules.

Quote:
Thus you can wield a gargantuan rifle as a meduim creature.

No, you can't.

Quote:
If he wished it to not work he should say ignore the line in the book. But he didn't.

...because he didn't need to.


wraithstrike wrote:
ATron9000 wrote:
wraithstrike wrote:
Many times the FAQ will just give intent. Later on they will errata it. Errata's are posted all at once, not individually, but until errata is posted most GM's are happy knowing intent.
those rules never say you can use a large two handed gun. They say the size doesn't change the mount of hands. The core rules about over sized weapons still apply. Case closed.
You are preachin' to the choir.

oops. I meant to quote Starbuck. I post from a cell so sometimes it gets the best of me.


A cell phone if I must clarify...


1 person marked this as a favorite.
ATron9000 wrote:
A cell phone if I must clarify...

I personally found the original post more amusing.

201 to 211 of 211 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / General Discussion / Paizo Blog: Revenge of the Son of the FAQ Attack! All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in General Discussion