Dumpy |
2 people marked this as FAQ candidate. |
So, the Eldritch Guardian's second level ability grants my familiar all combat feats I possess as long as it sees and hears me.
Martial Flexibility states it grants me the benefits of a combat feat I qualify for.
In my head, this would mean that I can martial flexibility and my familiar will gain the feat I choose to benefit from.
On paper however, flexibility states I gain the "benefits" of the feat. Thus, I am unsure if I actually gain the feat to give to my familiar, or if I only gain the benefits of it.
Unless my search-fu is weak and dishonorable, I haven't seen this brought up anywhere else. Does anybody know how this works exactly?
NRVNQZR |
I've been wondering about this very same thing, and on paper it does say "benefits" rather than "gaining" the feat itself. From what I understand, going strictly by RAW, the answer is unfortunately 'no'. Unless we get an errata/FAQ from Paizo saying otherwise.
Regardless, I'd say the interpretation could slide either way depending upon how RAW-based your GM is. All we can really do is wait and see. :\
If I am wrong, however, please correct me!
The Mortonator |
I've been wondering about this very same thing, and on paper it does say "benefits" rather than "gaining" the feat itself. From what I understand, going strictly by RAW, the answer is unfortunately 'no'. Unless we get an errata/FAQ from Paizo saying otherwise.
Regardless, I'd say the interpretation could slide either way depending upon how RAW-based your GM is. All we can really do is wait and see. :\
If I am wrong, however, please correct me!
I think you have an odd interpretation of the word benefits. For all purposes Martial Flexibility gives you a feat. One could even say the Familiar gaining the feat as well is a benefit. As far as I am concerned, the two synergize and produce a new baseline against which I judge Fighter builds.
Panchio |
1 person marked this as FAQ candidate. |
I was playing an Eldritch /Martial on my campaign when the DM suddenly came with that same observation. In the end, after some dialogue, I agreed with him that his interpration was reasonable.
Still, he also accepted he may be wrong.
I would really like a FAQ about thia, or at least a designer could do the blessijg of awnsering this haha.