I have always find strange that there are the Super Genius classes... except the Mosaic Mage.
And for a class like Mosaic mage, the possibility of looking a spell clasification based on magic school, could be necessary.
Probably because that 3pp stuff isn't OGL'd.
Probably because that 3pp stuff isn't OGL'd.
Ummm, which ones?
I dunno, I was just guessing =)
|
Yes, mostly I was referring to Paizo books, though if there is explicitly something from a 3pp you want to see that has been out for some time you can mention that as well. However, my reasoning is I'm trying to "fill in holes" of Paizo stuff. Recently someone posted in the Fans of d20pfsrd.com Facebook Group that some stuff appeared to be missing from Blood of Angels (and it was.) That's kind of what I'm mostly looking for.
As for 3pp stuff not on the site, the vast, vast majority is fully OGL'd so if its not there its almost certainly simply because we haven't gotten to it yet. If there is strong demand for certain things we can push that stuff higher in the queue though.
The rules for race creation? If it's there, I keep missing it. :-(
Thanks! :-D
Yeah, I wouldn't mind seeing some of Rite Publishing Kaidan archetypes, like those from Way of the Yakuza and Way of the Samurai - especially as there currently are no archetypes for samurai, for example. I'm too busy creating the content to post it to d20pfsrd.com, but wouldn't mind seeing it there.
Actually there's like only one or two Rite Publishing archetypes in any of the d20pfsrd.com at all.
I honestly don't know, but I'll keep my eyes open. You guys do a pretty good job when it comes to updating pfsrd. I really enjoy my website and my fellow players and DM does as well.
I wouldn't mind see more Rite Publishing archetypes - like samurai archetypes for Way of the Samurai.
I'd like to see Super Genius Games' Anachronistic Adventurers claases be put on d20pfsrd.com.
What about the material from the Distant Worlds setting? Have you put in the material from Blood of Fiends?
As far as 3PP goes, I'd love to see the Mosaic Mage and the Time Warden.
Thanks for all you guys do. It's an invaluable aid to my GMing!
I know I would love to see the Expanded Spell-less Ranger and the Expanded Shaman for Open Design's New Paths series. I've tried to work the ESR into a PbP game or two and couldn't because it wasn't available online.....
KQ spell-less ranger please, there seems a big request for it
|
|
Kobold Quarterly decided not to make the Spell-less ranger open game content, i.e. no one can use it without their explicit written permission. The only content from the issue that the spell-less ranger appeared in that is open game content is:
Open Game Content: The Open content in this issue includes the monster statistics in the the “Werebeasts” article, feats in the "Uvandir" article, and the "Whack Jacks and Harpy Nets" article. All other material is Product Identity. No other portion of this work may be reproduced in any form without permission.
Therefore, unless something has changed, the spell-less ranger will never appear on d20pfsrd.com.
|
|
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
I just checked the Expanded Spell-Less Ranger and that one is also 100% CLOSED content, i.e. never gonna see it on d20pfsrd.com. In general, a large enough portion of the content we see from Open Design/Kobold Quarterly is restricted enough to where we just don't even bother looking at them. Its usually a waste of our time.
What's funny is, the OGL statement is actually kind of funny:
Open Game Content: All material — including but not limited to art, place and character names, character and setting descriptions, background, and new class descriptions— is Product Identity. All other content is considered Open Game Content.
So essentially, "All material..." is Product Identity (i.e. closed content) but then it goes on to say "All other content is considered Open Game Content."
What other content?
Maybe the words "Open Game Content" is product identity, and everything else (content) can be used as seen fit?
A sort option for traits based on Race, region, or religion.
as I always have to painfully hunt for one that covers a specific race, or region that is my character or part of their back story.
The Kaidan stuff I would highly recommend. Especially from Way of the Samurai (Onmyoji archetype especially is just awesome). Great stuff.
Will you guys be updating the psionic section or is that still on the back burner? Sorry if this is the wrong thread to ask but I cant think of anything right now besides that.
|
Is it me being blind, or is there no entry for Horse in the alphabetical listing of the bestiary?I believe it is listed under Animal, Horse
If you look under the Animal subtype, yes. However, in the overall Bestiary(alphabetical) section, there is no heading for Animal (although there is for "Animal Lord". Nor is there for Horse, or Herd Animal: Horse.
|
Kobold Quarterly decided not to make the Spell-less ranger open game content, i.e. no one can use it without their explicit written permission. The only content from the issue that the spell-less ranger appeared in that is open game content is:
Open Game Content: The Open content in this issue includes the monster statistics in the the “Werebeasts” article, feats in the "Uvandir" article, and the "Whack Jacks and Harpy Nets" article. All other material is Product Identity. No other portion of this work may be reproduced in any form without permission.Therefore, unless something has changed, the spell-less ranger will never appear on d20pfsrd.com.
The single biggest problem with Open Design/KQ right there. For a company who owes a lot of its sales to the OGL, they don't add anything to the base of OGC, they just exploit it.
The Advanced Race Guide adds new feats and other options specifically for each race. I don't think you guys ever got around to adding the new feats from that book to the appropriate racial entries.
I don't know if this is the right place, but it would be really really kewl if the monster advancer had more monsters plugged into it. I think it just has the Bestiary at this point.
I like to just.....sit there and plug stuff into it. It's almost a hobby.
A sort option for traits based on Race, region, or religion.
as I always have to painfully hunt for one that covers a specific race, or region that is my character or part of their back story.
I'm going to agree with this. I'd wondered how and where to ask if you could break the race, religion, and regional traits down by race/deity/region. It would simplify searches enormously.
I gotta say, I don't like the new goods ans services format. I used to search the long list with Ctrl+F and it was easy to find something even if I only vaguely knew what it was. Now there are 8 lists to search through and it takes more effort. I have the same problem with the bestiary.
I gotta say, I don't like the new goods ans services format. I used to search the long list with Ctrl+F and it was easy to find something even if I only vaguely knew what it was. Now there are 8 lists to search through and it takes more effort. I have the same problem with the bestiary.
They likely did it that way from a manageability perspective.
Because if it was all one page, it would be a b**** to manage from a programmer's view point.If it's broken down into smaller more manageable chunks, it's easier on the programmer and the users to find what they are looking for.
recently I had the problem that only corebook stuff was allowed for a game, an other site had it listed like that but not yours, please consider making a "group" page for everything only form the corebook (classes, feats, spells)
Actually, I've always found them very good at listing which is core and which is 3rd party.
Actually, I've always found them very good at listing which is core and which is 3rd party.
I mean: all of them would be in one place, split off from the mixed things, or be able to see it like that
|
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I mean: all of them would be in one place, split off from the mixed things, or be able to see it like thatActually, I've always found them very good at listing which is core and which is 3rd party.
Not going to happen only because the amount of work that would be required would mean I would have to quit my day job and do nothing but re-org the site. I happen to NEED my day job, the income it provides, and the insurance I get from it lol
|
|
They likely did it that way from a manageability perspective. Because if it was all one page, it would be a b**** to manage from a programmer's view point. If it's broken down into smaller more manageable chunks, it's easier on the programmer and the users to find what they are looking for.
This. Exactly. First, one long page with 9 million items on it, first listed in a table with 9 million rows, and then listed individually in a details section... is.. uhh.. a challenge. I feel for you that its a bit more involved now but this had to happen. Heck we haven't even added in the Ultimate Equipment stuff yet. This had to happen BEFORE we even considered adding in the UE stuff.
Not going to happen only because the amount of work that would be required would mean I would have to quit my day job and do nothing but re-org the site. I happen to NEED my day job, the income it provides, and the insurance I get from it lolI mean: all of them would be in one place, split off from the mixed things, or be able to see it like thatActually, I've always found them very good at listing which is core and which is 3rd party.
sheesh, start a Kickstarter project to get money for the time you work on d20pfsrd instead of being at dayjob. XD
you could also get extra cash this way, enough to make unique drawings for weapons, armor, classes :3
For the manageability problem: Could you have the server just concatenate all those grouped pages into one? That way you could maintain them separately but have it show up as a list?
I don't know how your back-end is set up, so it may be easier said than done.
Just took a look at kobold quarterly #20. The elven archer class, the arrows of arboness (new arrow types) and some monster stats are all Open game content. So, can you add that to the d20 pfsrd site?
Just wanted to say...I find your site very useful. I have most of the books, but it is very nice to be able to(quickly) look up some info I need when I can't remember which book it was in. Thanks for the work and effort you put in on this.
|
|
I cancelled my subscription to KQ so I don't have it to post.
I just wanted to take this opportunity to say THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH!!! Jreyst, d20pfsrd.com is such a great boon to me, I find the site much easier to navigate and find thing on than Paizo's site. Being able to find all the archetypes, traits, etc. all together and easy to compare is such a godsend....I really can't say enough good things about what you guys have done here.
Thank you sir, and if ever we meet I shall buy you a drink.
Machinesmith class if possible please