Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ

Alzrius's page

Goblin Squad Member. Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber. Pathfinder Society Member. 2,050 posts. 70 reviews. No lists. 1 wishlist.


RSS

1 to 50 of 2,050 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

One of the characteristics of many harem shows is that they don't feature an actual harem, per se. That is, they typically feature a cast of three or more girls (having only two is a love triangle, rather than a harem) simultaneously competing for the same guy, rather than a featuring a stable polyamorous relationship between one guy and multiple girls.

Magika Swordsman and Summoner (Magika No Kenshi To Shoukan Maou) is one of the latter.

Magika is a light novel series with eleven volumes to date, and is ongoing. While there is a manga adaptation (which is receiving an official English translation), there's no anime that I'm aware of. At least, not yet. That said, the light novels have been translated into English via the fan community.

Set in the near future, Magika features a world where magic has come back, and completely changed everything. Everyone has at least some magic power, which can be used for defensive purposes, which is important because magic pretty much always trumps non-magic, making things like guns useless. Beyond mere physical enhancement, however, is summoning magic - the ability to bond with an astral entity (virtually always a god or spirit from a mythology), that allows for the use of stronger magical abilities. Only a few people have this, all of them women (since women naturally have greater magical affinity than men).

As a result of this, every country has exalted those who contract with its native mythology, becoming theocracies. The sole exception is Japan, where rather than the native mythology, the summoners contract with the spirits of the Lesser Key of Solomon.

It's against this backdrop that we meet Kazuki Hayashizaki, the only male to receive a summoning contract. Moreover, his contracted spirit isn't one that's among the seventy-two spirits that form the Pillars of Solomon.

It's not a spoiler to reveal that Kazuki's contracted spirit, Leme, is actually the incarnation of the Lemegeton (e.g. Lesser Key of Solomon) itself, as this forms the central premise of the series; Leme lets Kazuki use the powers of up to seventy-two other spirits, but his ability to do so is entirely dependent on how the girls contracted to those spirits feel about him. In essence, his power is directly tied to how many girls are in his harem, and how they feel about him.

It's this contextualization that really helps to ground the series, in terms of making everything adhere to the internal logic it presents. Kazuki, for example, is initially extremely leery of being a "harem king" - as Leme terms him - but given that summoners are needed to fight magic beasts (e.g. animals that have gained too much magic power and mutated) and rogue summoners, he quickly comes to realize that he needs to establish himself with multiple girls if he wants to have enough power to do anything.

Moreover, the eleven volumes (and counting) give the series enough room to spread this contextualization to other areas that a tighter focus would be hard-pressed to answer, such as why Japan's summoners don't use the native Japanese mythology, what mythology America's summoners use, or even what really constitutes a "mythology" in the first place and how that relates to these astral entities. There's some well-considered world-building here, even though it's doled out in small bits over the whole of the novels.

While I wouldn't go quite so far as to call the series lighthearted, it's far from being grim. The adventure portions of the series do stray into drama and tension with credible ability, for example. But the series never loses sight of the fact that it's home is in the harem genre. Even leaving aside the illustrations being focused primarily on beautiful girl after beautiful girl, the series placed a great deal of focus on Kazuki meeting new girls and increasing his "positivity level" - a handy numerical ranking that Leme gives him that lets him see what girls like him and how much - with them.

Overall, Magika is not just one of the better harem series around, but can credibly be called one of the best. Its adventure-focus means that it never gets completely lost in the sexy hijinks, while keeping said hijinks at the narrative forefront of the story and developing them as things progress (by the last couple of novels, Kazuki's relationship with the girls with the highest positivity level are very nearly pornographic). If you're a fan of harem stories, this one should definitely go in your reading list.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Judy Bauer wrote:
Judy Bauer wrote:
I'd be interested to see whether there's been any change in the 19 years since that study was published, given how much more time people now spend reading online content, which is much more "they"-friendly.

Lo! I was just reading Stephen Pinker's The Sense of Style (tl;dr: linguist analyzing writing style advice based on linguistic data and a panel of folks who work on dictionaries), and he says

Quote:
Experiments that measure readers' reading comprehension times to the thousandth of a second have shown that singular they causes little or no delay, but generic he slows them down a lot (Foertsch & Gernsbacher, 1997; M. Liberman, "Prescriptivist Science," Language Log, 2008).

If that's the sum total of what Pinker says about this citation, then he's leaving out quite a bit of context.

The citation here is for a 2008 paper (the M. Liberman citation) that looks at the Foertsch & Gernsbacher 1997 paper and then compares it to a 2007 paper (A. J. Sanford & R. Filik, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(2) 171-178, 2007).

In his paper, Liberman relates that the Foertsch & Gernsbacher paper determined that the singular they didn't impose any extra cognitive load as compared to "stereotype-mismatched pronouns (e.g. "truck driver … she" or "nurse … he")"

Liberman then goes on to compare this to the 2007 Sanford & Filik paper, which looks at "The plural pronouns they and them are used to refer to individuals with unknown gender and when a random allocation of gender is undesirable. Despite this apparently felicitous usage, “singular they/them” should raise processing problems under the theory that pronouns seek gender- and number-matched antecedents."

Liberman notes that Sanford and Filik's data shows the following:

Quote:

For him or her with a singular antecedent, the average was 1380 milliseconds, while for them with a singular antecedent, the average total reading time was 1414 milliseconds — a 34 millisecond difference! This difference was statistically significant, at least when the times were compared segment by segment. But the time for reading all three segments was only about 2.4% slower on average.

In contrast, him or her with a plural antecedent required an average of 1521 msec to read all three segments, while them with a plural antecedent took an average of 1315 msec, or 206 msec faster. That's a difference of about 16%.

In other words, using "they" after having already established the presence of multiple people was faster than using a singular pronoun - whether male or female - after having established the presence of multiple people. Liberman further notes their conclusion:

Quote:

While the use of they as a genderless “singular” referential pronoun in certain contexts certainly occurs and does not seem to cause problems of felicity from the point of view of casual observation, some processing difficulties were nevertheless observed in our eye-tracking study. Earlier researchers (Foertsch & Gernsbacher, 1997) found that with neutral, apparently genderless, antecedents like someone, or a runner subsequent clauses referring to that individual by he or she, or they, revealed no reliable disadvantage in the case of using they. On the surface, this might be taken as compatible with the position that there is indeed no processing disadvantage to using they as a genderless singular. In the present experiment, we increased the sensitivity of the design in two ways. First, we used continuous eye-tracking, enabling more subtle measurement of any possible patterns of disruption. Secondly, we compared the effects of genderless referential plural antecedents with that of genderless singular referential antecedents. On total time for the pronoun region, we observed a strong, conventional, number-mismatch effect, such that plural pronouns created less processing disruption in the context of plural antecedents than in the context of genderless singular antecedents.

This result is compatible with the view that after encountering a plural pronoun (they, them), a search is initiated for a plural antecedent in the mental representation of the discourse and not for one that could be either plural or singular. So where does this leave the singular use of they/them? Since it is in common use, we suggest that although it gives rise to a mismatch, it is rapidly accommodated as an acceptable deviation. This is quite unlike the case with singular pronouns in the context of plural antecedents, because these are not in common use and, we claim, do not make sense without making an inference like “he or she refers to just one of the plurality in the antecedent”.

Most important, however, seems to be Liberman's ultimate conclusion after looking these papers over:

Quote:
But crucially, despite references to questions of usage, these papers are mainly oriented towards a debate among psycholinguists about the nature of pronoun processing, not towards a debate about pronoun usage among providers of writing advice. And as a result, the experiments don't directly address the issue that really matters in most practical cases — how should you refer to a non-referential singular indefinite antecedent ("anyone"; "a student"; etc.) when you need or want to leave sex unspecified? To be relevant to this real usage debate, experiments would need to test they against "he or she" (or "she or he", or "that person", or whatever); and would also need to check systematically for the cognitive load imposed by attempts to use he as a default pronoun.

So the idea that "singular they causes little or no delay, but generic he slows them down a lot," as Pinker notes, is eschewing a very large degree of data, to the point of not accurately representing the results...which don't really speak to the issue of wanting a non-gendered singular pronoun that isn't confusing anyway.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

I've long been of the opinion that the absence of something good in a show doesn't necessarily make it a bad show. There's a difference between an actual instance of failure, in any particular regard, and simply not doing something very well. That's the difference between a series that's genuinely bad versus those that are forgettable in their mediocrity.

This latter category is how I would categorize Linebarrels of Iron (Kurogane no Linebarrel). (I should also note that, in the English title, there really doesn't seem like there should be an "s" in "Linebarrels." That's because not only is there no such sound in the original Japanese, but the actual Linebarrel in the show is unique. But I digress.)

A twenty-four episode series, Linebarrels takes place in the extremely near future. It begins when a perpetually-bullied young man, Kouichi Hayase, is killed when a giant mech falls out of the sky and crushes him. Resurrected by the guilt-stricken (and very beautiful) female pilot, Kouichi finds that his newfound lease on life has not made him into the pilot of that mech - the eponymous Linebarrel - and in doing so dragged him into a war that's just breaking out between KATO-KIKAN (a ruthless terrorist organization determined to rule the world) and a small group fighting against them.

While the initial premise isn't anything to write home about, it's the execution where the series really fails to deliver. I enjoyed the fact that, once Kouichi finds out how much power he's been given, it almost immediately goes to his head, resulting in him lashing out at anyone who opposes him, regardless of the collateral damage, while pontificating about justice. That struck me as more interesting than his instantly becoming an archetypal hero.

Unfortunately, the show never develops that - or really much of anything - to its full potential. Once Kouichi is made to realize the error of his ways, the show largely develops into a situational comedy with periodic action/adventure breaks. Virtually every cliché you can imagine is utilized, such as the villain who self-confidently says that everything is going according to plan no matter what setbacks he suffers, the hero unlocking new powers with his mech when he becomes utterly enraged, several female characters all pining for Kouichi in their own way (the tsundere leading lady, the spitfire female mech pilot, the warm and caring other female pilot, the childhood friend who's good at cooking, etc.), and even a beach episode with a giant octopus monster.

The worst of these is with characters dying (or about to die), only to be revealed to actually have survived/be rescued/be resurrected later on. That particular bait-and-switch is pulled on us several times over the series, to the point where it becomes more unexpected for characters to actually stay dead (which only happens rarely).

The end result is a series that feels not so much bad as simply paint-by-numbers, and so is rightly overshadowed by other series that have done it better. I read on Wikipedia that the anime for this took a large number of creative liberties from the original manga, and while I haven't read the manga, the anime doesn't seem to have benefitted from having gone so far astray from the source material.

Ultimately, Linebarrels of Iron is such a low-impact show that it's not only not very good, but isn't even very bad, either. It's just sorta there, and can be overlooked with absolutely nothing noteworthy being missed for having done so.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

You don't need to worry, the chart you're thinking of using is entirely Open Game Content; that's why it's on that site.

The link you're referring to is slightly antiquated, but still has the 3.5 SRD on it; it's now under the "d20 System Archive" link on that WotC page.

As a note, the page with the defense bonus isn't from the 3.5 SRD anyway, but rather from Unearthed Arcana, which had a lot of its text made Open Gaming Content. As such, you need to include it in your Section 15 of your publication.

To keep it simple, your publication would need to reprint all of the text on this page above the words "END OF LICENSE."


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Thomas Seitz wrote:

Yeah well. Even still.

Did Dean finally punch God in the face?

Spoiler:
Nope. Rather, Dean treated God pretty much the way someone would treat a deadbeat dad who suddenly walked back into their life.

Appropriately enough, God said to Dean flat-out, "Don't confuse me with your dad."


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

I recently finished Doc Martin: Practice Makes Perfect, the novelization of the first season of the BBC hit show Doc Martin.

I was pleasantly surprised by how the author wrote the book, as he unexpectedly downplayed certain elements from the first season while tying others together more tightly than the show's episodic format. Neither of these was overwhelming, but combined with narrative exposition about what the characters were thinking, it made it just different enough from watching the show that it felt like a fresh take on things.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
TaliaKirana wrote:
Yeah, I loved that scene with Rainbow Dash ** spoiler omitted ** that everyone else seems to despise. Thought it was the funniest thing I've seen in quite some time.

People despise that scene? I can understand it being hard to watch if you're a fan of Rainbow (e.g. seeing someone usually so confident acting so insecure), but that aside I thought that it was highly amusing.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

So I have to say, after last week's episode being so incredibly mediocre, this week's turned out to be one of the best in recent memory.

Spoiler:
The fact that the show openly acknowledged that Chuck was God wasn't exactly a revelation, and the episode smartly didn't treat it like one. Instead, it wisely gave us an expose on God's character - brilliantly self-referential by having God want Metatron to edit his autobiography - and it really did a fantastic job.

The show has established for a while now that God no longer cares about his creations, and they played that one up here for all it was worth. The idea of God being sick of everything, not even in an angry way but simply so thoroughly uncaring, is such a great angle. It's not one that I've really seen before in most productions that portray God. The part where Metatron breaks down and tearfully asks God why he left them all, only for God to flatly reply, "because you disappointed me. You all disappointed me," was pure gold.

This also showed us that the character of Metatron still has a lot of depth to him. This episode made reference to him in every aspect we've seen, from his being a lover of stories to an evil God-wannabe to a pathetic human, and even showed that at his core he still cared about humanity. It was great.

This episode showed very well why I'm still excited for the show so long after people say that it's "peaked," and why I'm looking forward to future seasons.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

So it's been confirmed that Supernatural will not only have a season 12, but a season 13 as well, with Jared and Jensen both signing on for both upcoming seasons. Moreover, "The CW president even admitted that he is an avid fan of the show and will continue to renew the series as long as the lead actors will reprise their roles."

Looking forward to it! (Even if this last week's episode was utterly forgettable.)


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Aaron Whitley wrote:
Saldiven wrote:
Aaron Bitman wrote:
Um... I'll give you the sword, but the phoenix didn't fight the basilisk directly. He brought Harry the sword, and when Harry got injured and poisoned in the battle, the phoenix played cleric by saving him. But only Harry did the actual fighting, IIRC.
Fawkes blinded the Basilisk by pecking out its eyes.
Which had the added benefit of removing its ability to turn someone to stone. So at that point the basilisk is essentially a giant venomous snake.

And even then, it was still able to take Harry out (even if it was taken out in the process); he was dying before Fawkes cried on his wound. That's further grist for the "low-level characters" mill.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

And so it begins...

EPIC POETRY BATTLES OF PATHFINDER!


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

On the issue of gaming in the Potterverse, a blog that I like wrote up a two-part series of articles about this. The first deals with the setting's basic assumptions about the magic-using population, while the second deals with how magic works in that setting.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Orfamay Quest wrote:
.... as was discussed in the article i linked:

I know; I've read that article many times. That's why I brought it up here, since your post didn't otherwise mention it and it's a valid point worth noting (especially for anyone who doesn't want to click the link and read the entire article).


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

Orfamay Quest summed it up pretty well. I'd also add that class-level based systems tend to be bad for character conversions anyway, because the segregation of various powers among certain classes at certain levels can wreak havoc on attempting to build a reasonable facsimile of a character that wasn't originally made with those class levels in mind. You'll usually end up with some powers being missing, while other powers that don't reflect the source material end up being part of the build anyway.

The result usually ends up as a character conversion that's only somewhat recognizable, and quite often is sub-par compared to a character of similar level that was made by working with the system, rather than having to fight it to get what you want.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

Another excellent piece of poetry!


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Deadmanwalking wrote:
But it's not satire of the concept that 'pretty women are only good as eye candy', it reinforces that concept to satirize 'Sex Sells' marketing.

Leaving aside questions of putting forward a particular idea as "reinforcing" it in the minds of the readers, I don't believe you're correct. The poem opens and ends with an in-character notation of the people telling the tale admitting that they went for looks over ability, and hence they're what's being ribbed here.

Quote:
I object to that usage of a noxious stereotype to oke fun at something else. I find it in poor taste.

I believe that your premise is incorrect here, and so leads to an incorrect conclusion.

Quote:
Where in the poem does she do anything not based on sex?

Nowhere; that would undercut the context of the poem.

Quote:
You could have a poem that delivers this message. It would have the same first verse, and maybe the same last one. The rest would involve her actually being competent (and maybe people being surprised by that, or refusing to acknowledge it)...but that's not what this poem is like.

Again, I don't agree with your assertion that the only way to poke fun at the underlying stereotypes made with reference to Seoni is to have her character in the poem undertake competent non-sexual actions. Indeed, I believe that would undermine the message, rather than reinforcing it.

Quote:
This poem is absolutely propagating the assumption in question.

There's absolutely nothing within the poem itself that supports that assertion, and quite a bit that contradicts it.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Deadmanwalking wrote:
The problem is that, given that Seoni has, to my knowledge, not slept with anyone ever, and certainly with no more than one or two people (and is in an ongoing comic series where that sort of thing does happen to other people)...that's just as bad.

Hence why it's satire, rather than holding itself to be a true and accurate representation.

Quote:
Assuming a woman (even a fictional character) is promiscuous, and utterly worthless aside from as a sex object, just based on the fact that she's scantily dressed is a large part of the problem with the poem, IMO.

The poem is poking fun at the people who make that assumption, and used Seoni's character (e.g. her looks) as a basis for it, rather than propagating the assumption itself.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

I quite enjoyed this poem, and this thread reminds me of the quote from Wayne Gerard Trotman, “It is impossible to be truly artistic without the risk of offending someone somewhere.”

EDIT: I also think that this poem is actually satirizing Seoni as a character, rather than making a comment about women. There's a reason why the "saucy sorceress" in this poem never once casts a spell. (That and, you know, the entire last stanza.)


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Adjule wrote:
And while I thank you for the link to the 3.0 SRD, Alzrius, that has to be the most atrocious thing I have ever seen. But thank you nonetheless. But if you are looking for a more readable one, this one looks better.

It does indeed. Thanks for finding that, I was pretty sick of relying on those cumbersome .rtf files. They're good for personal archiving, but not so much for quick reference.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Adjule wrote:
Is there a 3.0 SRD out there somewhere?

Yes, there is.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

Another winner! You really have a talent for these!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
rabindranath72 wrote:

You have a good point about the shifting of policy from adventures to rules. I say "shifting" because I recall the main motivation which convinced my group to move to 3e, was Peter Adkison stating that "there won't be any additional rules beyond the three core books, but only setting and adventures"; his idea was essentially to return to the early 1e days. We know that the late 1e stuff was published essentially to save TSR's bacon; and similarly, although the introduction of 3.5, (as stated by Monte Cook) was planned from the start only to fix errata, it actually became a big overhaul (and with all the subtle changes, it's difficult NOT to think they did it to get people to buy the books all over again.)

When Adkison left WotC, apparently the people who took the reins didn't quite agree with his view.

They didn't, but Adkison and co. honestly thought that they would, as said by someone who was there at the time.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
rabindranath72 wrote:
The unbeatable encounter in the module drives home the point that not every monster encounter should be solved with violence, and that fleeing IS an option. Looking at the encounter distribution table in the DMG we also learn that most of the encounters should be challenging, not cakewalks; so the idea of "balance", meaning that all encounters should be beatable, is NOT really part of the game.

There's a great article about encounter design in Third Edition that talks about this - including noting this very encounter - over at The Alexandrian.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

Very clever and very funny! And definitely the sort of thing I'd expect to hear bards singing in the game world!


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

I've written a small (and long overdue!) update to this series of articles, covering the Core prestige classes!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

Hubba Hubba Zoot Zoot!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Dragon78 wrote:
I would like to see a Rarity episode that has nothing to do with her store, fashion, crushes, or social climbing.

Wasn't that what we got in Rarity Investigates! (and for that matter, her role in Gift of the Maud Pie)?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

WOOT! Amazon Japan has just put the tenth volume of Overlord up for pre-order! The book finally releases as of May 30th!


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Arloro wrote:
Sounds like a Scythe Falcon. Is this from Slumbering Tsar? CR 2 Animal. It has Scythe wings which have an ability called dismemberment. Upon a critical hit, instead of multiplying the damage you roll a d6, and cut off the corrosponding limb (1 head, 2 right arm, 3 left arm, 4 right leg, 5 left leg, 6 torso savagely cut).

This sounds like it might be it; some Googling says that this is from the original Creature Collection, which makes me wonder if it was ever updated in the v.3.5 revision of that book, or maybe the compiled Tome of Horrors for Pathfinder.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

So I'm trying to remember a monster that I know I know, but my brain refuses to identify. It was a bird with a very low CR (something like CR 2) that had vorpal wings, allowing it to potentially behead an opponent on a natural 20...or something like that.

Does anyone remember what this is and what book it's from?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
TaliaKirana wrote:

Talk about things I thought would never happen.

Official MLP tabletop RPG announced.

Okay, so I watched the video in the link that Talia posted up above - or rather, I watched the part that was about the MLP RPG (starting at about 42:00 in the video, and going for about a half-hour) - and I have to say I was pleasantly surprised by how much the designers seemed to know about the series, and by some of what they let slip about how the game will be made. It was enough to turn me from being nervous about this to being excited for it.

Some highlights from that interview are as follows:

  • The RPG will be called "Tails of Equestria."
  • It will be released as a hardcover book, not a boxed set.
  • It will not make use of miniatures (that is, this won't require miniatures to play).
  • The character sheets will be for earth ponies, unicorns, pegasi, and "draw your own." Each character sheet will have a space to draw a picture of your character (the three pony races will have a basic image to embellish, and the "draw your own" will have a blank space), as well as a second space to draw your cutie mark.
  • Characters will have the option of starting as a pony that's already obtained their cutie mark, or as a blank flank and discovering their cutie mark during the course of the game.
  • "Nobody can start as an alicorn."
  • Characters will have three stats: Body, Mind, and Charm.
  • As part of character creation, you have a d4 and a d6; you pick which of these are associated with your Body and Mind stats (they didn't say what determines Charm).
  • There's no "class" for characters; what you are is determined by your race and your special talent.
  • Your level of talent is determined by the size of the die you roll. An ordinary unicorn has a d6 for Telekinesis; Twilight Sparkle is described as having "a d12 or d20."
  • Similarly, pegasi automatically receive a d6 in the Fly talent, while earth ponies automatically have their Body die increased to the next die size.
  • Each character chooses a personal talent, as well as a personal flaw.
  • Your Body stat will determine your Stamina points, which are the game's version of hit points.
  • Making an action that's opposed by another creature (e.g. hoof-wrestling) is determined by opposed rolls. Trying to accomplish a task against a situation (e.g. kick down a door) is made by rolling to equal or exceed a target number.
  • The game uses an "exploding dice" mechanic. More specifically, if you roll the maximum value on a die, you may then roll the next larger die, and keep whichever result is better. This can happen cumulatively, so if you roll a 4 on a d4, and then roll a 6 on a d6, you can go ahead and roll a d8, keeping that value if it's higher than your 6 from the d6.
  • The game will include stats for personalities from the show, including the Mane Six, Princess Celestia, and Princess Luna.
  • The game will include an introductory adventure; adventuring will include being sent on missions by the Cutie Map.
  • Supplementary materials will include things such as character sheets and a GM screen.
  • The designers mention that they're willing to receive proposals from RPG writers who want to submit other supplements for publication.

I think this sounds like a lot of fun, and I can't wait to see the finished product!


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

So having just watched the latest episode, did anyone else notice that the show is now disagreeing with itself about the shape of Equestria's western coast?

(I know this is a symptom of having an old and a new official map, but the change to shape of the continent was entirely unnecessary, in terms of making it match what the show has said.)


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

ZUFF! PAN!! SNUH! BORT! POOO! NEWT! MINT! ZAK!


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

I seem to recall that their powers were at least partially based on...

Spoiler:
being made to host pieces of the soul of the demon D'Spayre.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

I really want to know if this fits into the wider continuity of the MCU or the X-Men movies, or is just going to be stand-alone.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Orthos wrote:
That and, at least I surmise, there's some level of solidarity. I would be very very surprised if there were not several Paizo staff members who were part of the community on the other site in question. There's a lot of overlap in the interests, behaviors, politics, and preferences between the two groups.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who sees this.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Drahliana Moonrunner wrote:

How does that saying go again?

"If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem."

-Eldridge Cleaver (thank you Google!)

"If you're not with us, you're against us" goes back much further than that, and has been said in many forms by many people.

"Each man must choose between joining our side or the other side. Any attempt to avoid taking sides in this issue must end in fiasco."

-Vladimir Lenin


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

Also ported from that thread:

thejeff wrote:
Except that of course in most of the described cases there is no "accused". There is no named individual. There is no accused asserting the accuser is a liar. These are not in any meaningful sense "particular accusations". There is no person being punished with social opprobrium. How do we punish the "balding, middle-aged man behind the counter", when that's all we know?

Presuming that we're still discussing that particular Tumblr blog, there is indeed an accused; however, they're kept anonymous so as to accuse the larger sub-section of a particular community as a whole. It's not that "there are the occasional jerk in gaming (just like everywhere else)" it's that "gaming has a white male terrorism problem."

This simply moves the accused from an individual to an entire community, which is indeed then held accountable with social opprobrium. There are reasons why people still think poorly of gamers.

Quote:
They are stories of things that have happened to various women. The only accusation is that this is common enough in the gaming community to be a real problem.

Which indicts the whole for the actions of less than the whole. This is worse than accusing a particular individual, since it maintains that everyone is a particular demographic is part of the problem unless they can put forth that they're somehow exempt from this (which usually invites contempt, as Rysky's post shows).


10 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Chris Lambertz wrote:
Removed a series of folks.

The excised content...IS PEOPLE!


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Dragon78 wrote:
So what are everyone's hopes/ideas/dreams for this season?

In terms of plot development and characterization, I'm not sure I really have any; for the most part, I'm happy to let the show do its own thing in that regard, since - having come to enjoy what the show has put forth thus far - I don't think that they'll make any changes that would be so radical as to undercut what they've done up until now. Watching the characters be themselves, and do what they do, is already enjoyable enough that I'm happy to let them keep doing their thing.

What I am looking forward to is more world-building and revelations regarding the setting's internal logic and consistency. The more we find out about how things work in that world, the more fun I find it to be.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Caineach wrote:
Waiting time between episodes allowed the suspense to build pretty well.

While I do agree that there are some series that work better in small doses over time, rather than binge-watching them - KonoSuba was one of those - there's a very heavy asterisk there in that such designations are entirely personal, speaking to an individual's personal tastes rather than any sort of objective criteria for how the show is "best" viewed.

...at least, I think so.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

So I started watching Erased ("Boku Dake ga Inai Machi") last night. I only planned on watching one or two episodes, but the series hooked me so hard that I ended up watching the entire thing in one sitting. It was just that good.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Tectorman wrote:
I always love it when we get to see them expand their range like that, even if it's just borrowing one of their friends'.

My favorite one of those was seeing Rainbow Dash's impersonation of Twilight in The Lost Treasure of Griffonstone.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
atheral wrote:
I saw it. I was expecting them to play the Magi's gift trope a bit more straight.

I agree; I was waiting for it to come out that Maud had traded Boulder away in order to get a similarly last-minute gift for Pinkie.

Quote:
It was pretty good, I do get the impression they are trying to really wrap up the beginning stories of the Mane 6 this season.

Can you expound on this? I'm not sure what you mean (no spoilers if this is in reference to future episodes, please!).

Quote:
I predict the season ending being a setup to launch Guardians of Harmony.

Spoiler tagged for those who don't know what this is...

Spoiler:
...which I think is all of us, isn't it? Last I heard, all that had been confirmed were some new figures and (I think) a comic series based around this. What it's actually about is still unknown, or at least that's what I'd heard. (My guess is that it'll be the subject of next year's feature film.)


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Dragon78 wrote:
** spoiler omitted **
Freehold DM wrote:
**spoiler omitted **

Spoiler:
Trying to parse Celestia's statement of "The birth of an Alicorn is something Equestria has never seen!" so that it means that there have been natural-born alicorns, they've just been from outside of Equestria, strikes me as being overly parsimonious. Even if we ignore that it's never been clear if Equestria was meant to refer to the geographic area (e.g. the continent) or the political area (e.g. the country), it seems fairly obvious that she's making a statement to emphasize a natural-born alicorn being heretofore unknown, rather than trying to parse that it's something that's never happened there but has happened somewhere else.

Even if that were true, the very next line is Luna saying "it" - which I think we can all agree is a reference to an alicorn being born rather than made - "is beyond even our understanding." Given that there's nothing that looks even remotely like parsing or qualifiers there, that would seem to definitively eliminate any ambiguity in her meaning, which is that there are no natural-born alicorns prior to Cadance and Shining Armor's baby.

(I expect a few people will say something along the lines of "but if it was the circumstances of their own births, then of course Celestia and Luna wouldn't know about that," which strikes me as very flimsy reasoning; it's dubious that they wouldn't remember whether or not they were alicorns during their earliest memories, let alone that nobody would have talked to them about their early years.)

There's also absolutely nothing that I can recall that definitively establishes that Celestia and Luna were born prior to Equestria's founding. The closest that we have is that, at the beginning of the Hearth's Warming Eve play, Spike says "Once upon a time, long before the peaceful rule of Celestia, and before ponies discovered our beautiful land of Equestria, ponies did not know harmony." That's it, and that only establishes that Equestria was founded "long before" the "rule" of Celestia, not when she and Luna were born.

Finally, insofar as The Journal of the Two Sisters goes, I'm honestly somewhat glad that this seemed to fly in the face of it. That book has always been a terrible resource that was not only non-canon, but created more problems than it solved. At this point, there are almost no secondary materials that are reliable; only what's in the show itself can be counted on.

(There are two exceptions to this that I know of. The first is the original map of Equestria, produced as a poster, which is actually shown in the show, which "is shown in Pinkie Pride during Cheese Sandwich's flashback in Cheese Confesses. A portion of the northwestern area of the map is also shown during Daring Don't. The full map appears again near the end of Twilight's Kingdom - Part 2, when the Rainbow Power is first used." Rather ironically, the updated map, from an artbook, is actually non-canon, because it shows that the western coast has changed shape - the so-called "undiscovered west" - so that it conflicts with the map shown in the show itself.

The second exception is early in The Mane Attraction, when Twilight mentions the connections that Pinkie Pie made while "organizing the Ponypalooza Rock Concert," apparently in reference to the chapter book about that same event.)


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
TaliaKirana wrote:
Kind of annoying to not even be allowed to say the titles outside of spoiler boxes.** spoiler omitted **

I can understand that, but I want to mention that I do appreciate it.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
atheral wrote:

It had a few interesting tidbits:

** spoiler omitted **

Spoiler:
I must have blinked...where did we see a changeling?

Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Nuku wrote:
Flutter wrote:
Dragon78 wrote:

This one could have easily been a 5 part episode.

I am getting tired of evil unicorns, when are going to see evil pegasi and earth ponies.

Much like non casters in pathfinder they seem to be a bit underpowered in ponyfinder. As important as it is to a society to be able to grow food, it just doesn't rate as a CR for an evil villain.

Hey now, Ponyfinder gives plenty to earth ponies, and our iconic wizard is an earth pony, though our most popular one is the earth pony fighter, go fig!

Not to say we don't have other ponies too. Our paladin is a unicorn, and a druid pegasus for optimal weather control.

To reiterate, the link that Flutter provided doesn't represent how earth ponies are statted up in the actual Ponyfinder game that Nuku linked to.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

Talia, your enthusiasm is unimpeachable, but I'd like to mention that even episode titles can be spoilers. Please put the titles inside the spoiler blocks going forward.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Bjørn Røyrvik wrote:
Kobold Cleaver wrote:
As long as they aren't stinkin' fake gamer geese...
I was unaware that geese played RPGs.

We just had someone talking about their all-duck group, so are gamer-geese really that surprising?

Besides, it's not the geese that are the problem, it's the fake gamer geese, who are usually frickin' ugly ducklings trying to pass themselves off as special little swans, etc.

EDIT: Yes, I know that ducks aren't geese, or swans. I apologize for showing my mammalian privilege.

1 to 50 of 2,050 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.