|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
Except every other shadow spell that creates phantom weapons gains strength to damage too, and these weapons are real enough to do half damage at minimum. Nothing about this spell in anyway says you do not add strength damage to the natural attacks given by it.
Unless you think Form of the Dragon isn't supposed to add strength bonus to the damage given by the claws, bite and wing attacks given by it.
The specifically states what the damage is, so no Strength modifier to damage.
So someone using long sword only gets 1d8 damage because it specifically states that is the damage of a long sword.
Form of the dragon:
so no strength bonus because it specifically lists the damage.
The spell in question specifically states:
So the claws have a base damage of 1d6 plus caster level slashing damage and of course anything else claws would get because they are claws. Unless you want to argue that every single time a weapon is listed out it has to have all the rules for that weapon listed or it doesn't get anything not stated.
However if I hand you a possession that does not require you to act.
You have passively benefited.
In other words: If I lose something and you find it you did not have to take it from me. You might have stolen it, but it is not a valid argument that because you have it you acted to take it from me.
In order for you to have sex with me you must act.
There is no way for me to simply give you sex -- and if I attempt to give you sex and you are not willing then I am raping you (regardless of if I am drunk or not).
Not all drinking = drunk
You are making an argument about the first when I haven't (and won't).
Yes -- as a matter of fact leavenworth is full of people that thought, "he/she is not drunk enough for him/her to not give consent."
This is a major problem people don't want to admit to because they are uncomfortable at the position they think they might find themselves in. In fact most cases of sexual harassment and rape involve alcohol. In fact in many cases the defendant's whole argument is, "I didn't think she was drunk enough to not give consent" or "but she wasn't that drunk!"
Basically if you want to avoid being charged with rape do not have sex with someone that has been drinking.
Not all drinking is drunk therefore not all sex while drinking is rape, however it is a very thin line and not one that you should put yourself on.
Chengar Qordath wrote:
This happened to a master sergeant I know -- woman got him passed out drunk and then raped him.
1. Is questionable2. Is drunk -> No Consent ∴ Rape
3. Is drunk -> No Consent ∴ Rape
4. Is drunk -> No Consent ∴ Rape
Also we very much are not talking about number 3 with charm magic from the get go:
Charm magic is not by consent -- [b]by very definition it is forcibly changing your opinion[b]. This means your judgement is impaired. You are under the effects of a mind altering substance (in this case a magic spell), which means you cannot (in regards to the person you are charmed towards) give informed consent, because they have already violated you.
Marcus Robert Hosler wrote:
Yes, on a technical level, with no other information.
Consent must be obtained or the act is forced.
Drunk has a legal definition. Consent has a legal definition, and you cannot consent while drunk. If you do not have consent then the act is not willing.
This is a basic point everyone needs to get into their heads.
Does this mean that you didn't do something that put you in the situation? No. But that doesn't excuse the other persons behavior either.
If I leave my house open and you take something from it you have still robbed me. I made it easy but you are still a robber.
Consequently if I get drunk I cannot give consent. If I do not give consent and you do it anyways you are a rapist.
My idiocy does not give you the right to my possessions.
Kain Darkwind wrote:
Voluntarily impairing your judgement does not render your judgements null and void agreed -- however taking advantage of someone with impaired judgement is taking advantage of someone with impaired judgement and that is rape.
Purposefully impairing someone's judgement and then taking advantage of that impairment is a violation of that person and is a rape.
Using drugs or magic either way doesn't change that.
Also prior consent does not imply current consent -- agreeing to something in past does not obligate you to provide consent and does not relieve your partner from having to obtain consent again for a new instance.
Impaired judgement renders you incapable of consent.
K177Y C47 wrote:
Surprised at how far you can be pushed doesn't mean you can be pushed in all cases or to the same point, specifically with a single method (i.e. diplomacy).
As per the skill some requests simply are not possible, therefore (again) we can conclude that not all requests are possible.
In that it is the same as boozing someone up. In the world in which I operate if you booze someone up then sleep with them it is rape, if you use charm person to sleep with them then it is rape.
At least with the booze they could have not drank.
Note how charm person doesn't match that language.
Charm person allows you to do things that you simply do not get to do with diplomacy from the get go.
Jeff W wrote:
You can, but you can also abuse scrolls created at levels lower than your caster level too, which is nice.
It also mixes nicely with the Razmiran Priest archetype for the sorcerer. At 9th level you can cast spells from scrolls using your spell slots and the with the pathfinder savant's scroll master ability you will do so at your own caster level.
Basically you simply keep a large number of divine scrolls and use them as extra spells known.
Reducing spells prepared per day hurts -- always.
However if you are going to mix it with say white mage and go for something a little less powerful and use the exploits that deal damage it's not the worse thing you could do for/to yourself. Especially if you want an arcanist that is more into charisma than intelligence.
provided you aren't into society play the alchemist gains a bonus on making alchemical items and makes them faster than anyone else. So he can build the alchemical cartridges and such that a gunslinger wants during down time and at the end of the day.
Purple Dragon Knight wrote:
Thank you, without derailing here too much, I addressed later in the thread that I wanted to stack against the farmer to start with so that if he was going to be dirt poor so to speak it would be under what I saw as draconian conditions. With the help of a spouse the farmer would be looking to see more like 792.5 gp net a year.
During times of peace and renaissance a gentleman might earn respect among his peers and a place with a noble order through his wit and drive instead of his steady swordarm. A gentleman Knight nevertheless upholds his code and duties with the same zeal that the cavaliers of old did.
Challenge(Ex): A gentleman Knight may expend a point of inspiration to use the cavalier's challenge ability as a cavalier of his level. This ability replaces trapfinding and all instances of trap sense.
The hound of Baskerville does not have access to the varied extracts of other investigators. Instead he relies on the steadfast services of his faithful animal companion.
Animal Companion(Ex): At level 1 a hound of Baskerville gains an animal companion as a druid equal to his level.
A hound of baskerville does not gain the alchemy ability, these abilities replace it completely.
The physician relies on his medical inspiration and more "natural" remedies to cure people in areas where magic has failed or is viewed with suspicion.
Medical Inspiration(Ex): A physician may use his inspiration ability on heal checks for free. A physician may use his intelligence modifier in place of his wisdom modifier on heal checks. In addition when using inspiration on a heal check he gains additional benefits based on what type of heal check he is performing:
First Aid -- The physician heals the patient a number of hit points equal to his inspiration bonus on the skill check.
Long Term Care -- The physician heals each of his patients additional hit points equal to his inspiration roll. He may instead heal an amount of ability damage for one patient equal to his inspiration roll.
Treat wounds from Caltrops, spike growth, or spike stones -- The physician reduces the amount of time required by a number of minutes equal to his inspiration roll.
Treat Deadly Wounds -- The physician heals the patient an additional amount of hp equal to his inspiration check with only a single use of a healing kit. A physician that exceeds the DC by 5 or more may heal an additional amount of hp equal to his intelligence modifier. Finally a physician can spend an additional point of inspiration to be able to treat deadly wounds on a patient a second time during the day. Each time he heals the same patient again in the same day it costs an additional inspiration point.
Treat Poison or Treat Disease -- The patient may use your heal check in place of his save throw against poison or disease.
At level 4 when the physician uses an alchemical item on an ally (including himself) he may spend a point of inspiration to increase the effectiveness of the alchemical item. When the physician uses this ability he makes an inspiration roll. He may increase the duration of the item by an amount equal to this roll in the form of duration the item already has (if the item lasts minutes he increases the duration a number of minutes equal to his roll, if it last rounds he instead increases the duration a number of rounds equal to his roll). He may instead increase the items effectiveness by an amount equal to his inspiration roll (if the item provides energy resistance it increases by an amount equal to his roll, if it provides fast healing it the amount of fast healing is increased by his roll).
At level 7 the when the physician improves an alchemical item for an ally he may also negate any negative side effects that come from using the item. The physician may also attempt to treat ailments other than those normally treatable by the heal skill. He may attempt to remove any of the following conditions from a patient; blindness, deafness, stunned, confused, fatigued, exhausted, nauseated, paralysis, sickened, staggered, or unconscious. The DC for the check is the Caster level of the effect + 10 and takes a full round action.
At level 10 the physician may attempt to treat wounds that would normally be fatal. By expending 5 points of inspiration the physician may attempt to treat someone that has been killed. The DC of the check is 10+the number of rounds the patient has been dead + the amount of negative hit points the patient is currently at. If the physician is successful the patient is revived with 0 hp and one negative level.
At level 13 the physician may attempt to treat permanent negative energy levels or ability drain. The DC for the check is 10 + the caster level of the effect.
This ability replaces Alchemy.
Under A Bleeding Sun wrote:
A trained laborer makes 3 silver/day. Assuming he works 7 days a week he earns 109.5 gold a year. Assuming not a penny of that goes for an kind of expense whatsoever it take 20.5 years to earn enough to buy a potion to alter sex. An unskilled laborer error earns 1 sp a day, so it takes 61.5 years. When you take in the fact very few people are working every day for 20+ years, and the fact that most of people's money goes to Survival I'd say it makes in world sense that someone may be Transgender rather than even bother.
Oh Gods not this again:
Let me help you out here:
Now it's not going to be quickly but it still is not going to take him 20.5 years, even accounting for expenses.
citation, and exact quotes.
Well I guess I can see that -- any trait can certainly be attractive (well, maybe not any trait but I get the idea).
I think it's because I read what was quote of you from Nicos and took that on its own. By itself and the throw away line of "concealing" I read it as "covered" or "not exposed" which let to the sarcasm/snark about being exposed and such.
But again in retrospect it looks more like I missed a beat an misunderstood what you were trying to say.
Ceres Cato It was sarcasm... sorry if I broke the meter.
Why/what does sexiness have to do with anything really?
It's not indicative of intelligence, strength, health, agility, skill, power, success, or anything else with the possible except of personal hygiene.
Honestly it's all about looks which are only skin deep. Of course when you think about it so is live cause if I get the blade under the skin... well...
Honestly I don't care. While I can generally find something amazing about any body (and anybody) that's because people are amazing things mechanically, aesthetically and in sheer ability.
At the end of the day the dress or lack of there is generally only indicative of what the person has on layered (or not) their body with and possibly what their immediate intentions for the future are.
Well you know I HAVE to prove I'm a man by dressing skimpy all the time. That's why I don't go anywhere without my banana hammock.
So of course a woman should be wearing something similar.
Of course sometimes it's cold, or I would like to dress with more clothes but I don't want people to think I'm afraid so all my tuxedos and armor have to expose my banana hammock.
There hasn't been "opposition" -- no one has said, "No this shouldn't be a part of gaming."
There has been a discussion on what "eyecandy" says about our society or how it is presented, and if it is evenhanded or not and a million other things.
But not once did a developer or employee of Paizo come in here and say, "You know what, we will not have any eyecandy or skimpy dressing for any more iconics from here on out."
I can almost guarantee there will be more eyecandy. If for no other reason than Freya, Seona, and all the other iconics are still the core iconics and therefore will be used more than the others in artwork for Paizo.
And on a serious note, if the fact that a company that people have discussed what they would like to see and how what has been affects them and other causes you to think you should be disappointed because you somehow are getting what you want and everyone else is, and somehow that means they are privileged.
No NOW I'm mad. They finally got an equal say. Grow up. For once they have a company that says, "Yeah we can make that happen." What you have gotten your entire life has finally happened for them. They are your equal and now you have to wait your turn.
It's no longer all about the semi-nude female for you to look at. Your tastes are not central and quite frankly this is a good thing.
At least have the good grace to wait your turn.
The basic idea of the thread, "Hey this is what I would like to see more of and it feels like you are over swinging in the other direction." Alright that was fair to be brought up as your opinion.
This last post however? It's crap.
There were a couple in the GM guide.
I'm not expecting a huge amount of them and I know that the iconics will have a default look and outfit of course. But a couple of different outfits here or there wouldn't be a bad thing.
But I do know better than to hold my breath waiting for it.
Well I certainly understand your position. I also appreciate you understand that you need your medication and use it. I know some who keep going on thinking they are better and don't need the medications and then dropping off them only to end worse than they started.
Also you are correct in identifying that choice is a huge part of it.
Another example would be limitless for me or steroid use by professional athletes.
I do understand and appreciate the need for medication to help people though and I am grateful that such medication is available for those that need it.
Crystal Frasier wrote:
Yeah sounds like Divergent or Brave New World, or The giver or any other variation on that theme to me...
I would worry for the person not creeped out by the idea.
Secondary point: Just because it might work for elves doesn't mean it would work for anyone else.
First off hello, great to meet you on these forums. I want to share something personal with you (and of course the general public). It may or may not apply but please take it in the helpful spirit it is offered.
As a CIS white male (I believe that is the correct term) I have had a very privileged and lucky life. This is no one's fault and I do not feel guilty for it.
However my overawareness of just how good I had it had often been a barrier to my own attempts to better understand other people. Ironically it was the fear that I would say something incredibly ignorant or stupid or down right offensive that would frighten me into not saying anything.
Fortunately I am rather gifted and used my awkward silence to listen and observe. What I saw helped me overcome my fear -- I saw other CIS white males make complete jerks of themselves... and people forgive them of it.
It wasn't the awkward questions or misunderstanding of terms or deeply personal nature of the questions that caused the problems though. It was usually the need for the CIS white male (as myself) to try and understand everything from my own viewpoint.
Which is ridiculous -- you can't do that and somethings there simply is no understanding. I guess it's kind of like faith, I can accept and believe something about someone without understanding it (Interestingly this has helped me accept myself more and there are things about me I don't understand and I have been able to find peace with).
The second biggest issue I saw was the need of the person to try and 'correct' or 'defend' when inevitably something got miss-communicated.
In this case people are telling you that you seem to be skirting or not understanding a specific point. They aren't accusing you of wrong doing. The thought or idea might be very foreign to you and therefore it is brought out again not to bludgeon you with it but so you can understand this hard point is very center to what is being discussed.
Now I do not know your race, sex, make up, intentions, or anything else about you other than you are in this thread and trying to learn and talk with others.
I want you to understand I find this extremely admirable and a great trait to have.
I simply want to offer a possible thought to you, or anyone else that might be reading on an issue I have had in the past.
To everyone else -- sorry about making this about me (damn that CIS White Male privilege!).
Oh general thought and point of order:
Paizo, when you get artwork of Iconics I would LOVE to see multiple pictures of the iconics in different outfits.
Seeing how the character dresses in different situations is awesome and helps break people of the thought, "But I have to always where my breast plate" or what not.
It's also fun to see what doesn't change in their clothing. Like the specific jewelry they keep, or such.
Finally the different outfits can help show faster than words ever will important points about cultures.
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:
I would normally second this but instead I will square it as it just sounds awesome.
Falls flat when you consider they could case cure spells in 1st edition too (since they cast as per druids). Also falls even more flat with the introduction of the witch, and there have always been other options for healing as arcane casters through out the editions.
Indeed the separation of magic into arcane and divine is itself a more recent addition to the system.