| Sigil150 |
Hello! I'm mainly making this post to share a little bit of an idea I have with the Starfinder community, and hopefully with Paizo as well if anyone within Paizo happens to see this.
So, as any good sci-fi universe does, Starfinder has a lot of alien species in its universe. Starfinder first edition had more simple rules that allowed for easy creation of playable ancestries that had short and simplistic stat blocks. But translating Starfinder's universe into the Pathfinder Second Edition rule set makes adapting a lot of the playable ancestries from first edition difficult.
Which is somewhat where my idea comes into play. My main idea was to have some sort of Pact Worlds Ancestry Guide of sorts that compiles all the rules for pre-existing ancestries in Starfinder Second Edition that are native to the Pact Worlds but only present in stuff like adventure paths and not major rule expansions (so for example Ikeshti, Shobhads, and Elebrians, but not Contemplatives, Sarcesians, and Astrazoans).
And in addition to having the ones found only in adventure paths, it could also introduce some new and updated ancestries for Starfinder Second Edition that are native to the pact worlds. Some new ones would include things like Formians, Urogs, Ryphorians, Verthani, SROs, and similar Pact Worlds native ancestries.
Driftbourne
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Starfinder Galactic Ancestries comes out at the beginning of April. It has 21 ancestry options, not sure if that's 21 ancestries or also includes versatile heritage and Starfinder heritages for PF2e ancestries. I suspect this will be the most ancestries we get at one time in SF2e
Starfinder Absalom Station comes out around August. Has one SF1e ancestry and one new ancestry.
| Sigil150 |
Starfinder Galactic Ancestries comes out at the beginning of April. It has 21 ancestry options, not sure if that's 21 ancestries or also includes versatile heritage and Starfinder heritages for PF2e ancestries. I suspect this will be the most ancestries we get at one time in SF2e
Starfinder Absalom Station comes out around August. Has one SF1e ancestry and one new ancestry.
Ah I see, I had no clue that those were even a thing. I never saw anything about that on this website, maybe it's just because I'm on mobile. Do you know if it will be including content for/from pre-existing ancestries that are in other books already?
sanwah68
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
It may include some from PF2, but as far as I can tell they are not planning on reprinting the ancestries released from other SF2 sources in Galactic Ancestries.
Other SF2 sources already available include:
Galaxy Guide:
Astrazoan
Contemplative
Dragonkin
Kalo
Sarcesian
Vlaka
Murder in Metal City:
Khizar
Guilt of the Grave World:
Elebrian
Corpse Folk (versatile heritage)
Starfinder Society 2 Players Guide 2025
Ikeshti
Shobad
Driftbourne
|
Driftbourne wrote:Ah I see, I had no clue that those were even a thing. I never saw anything about that on this website, maybe it's just because I'm on mobile. Do you know if it will be including content for/from pre-existing ancestries that are in other books already?Starfinder Galactic Ancestries comes out at the beginning of April. It has 21 ancestry options, not sure if that's 21 ancestries or also includes versatile heritage and Starfinder heritages for PF2e ancestries. I suspect this will be the most ancestries we get at one time in SF2e
Starfinder Absalom Station comes out around August. Has one SF1e ancestry and one new ancestry.
Galactic Ancestries was announced a while ago, but the Absalom Station book was just announced on Friday on the Paizo Live stream. Oddly, the Absalom Station book has a product page already, but it's not listed on the Starfinder Release Schedule.
The Stafinder developers, well over a year ago, has said the goal was to put out new ancestries as frequently as possible, usually 2 per AP or Book. The Galaxy Guide and Galactic Ancestries are the exceptions to try to get more ancestries into SF2e quickly. I don't expect Paizo to be republishing ancestries already published in SF2e, since that list will change frequently, and would take away time from working on new material for the game.
Meanwhile, all the ancestries are or will be in the Archive of Nethys.
| moosher12 |
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Driftbourne wrote:Ah I see, I had no clue that those were even a thing. I never saw anything about that on this website, maybe it's just because I'm on mobile. Do you know if it will be including content for/from pre-existing ancestries that are in other books already?Starfinder Galactic Ancestries comes out at the beginning of April. It has 21 ancestry options, not sure if that's 21 ancestries or also includes versatile heritage and Starfinder heritages for PF2e ancestries. I suspect this will be the most ancestries we get at one time in SF2e
Starfinder Absalom Station comes out around August. Has one SF1e ancestry and one new ancestry.
The cover features a goblin (so space goblin heritage would likely come), a bantrid, and an Izalguun.
Additionally, Formians, moonflower leshies, Azrinarans (Void Elves, formerly drow, likely an elf heritage), and a playable ooze people are confirmed,
I think it's safe to assume at least the Pathfinder core races, Elf, Orc, Leshy, Halfling, and Gnome would be included.
| Sigil150 |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Sigil150 wrote:Driftbourne wrote:Ah I see, I had no clue that those were even a thing. I never saw anything about that on this website, maybe it's just because I'm on mobile. Do you know if it will be including content for/from pre-existing ancestries that are in other books already?Starfinder Galactic Ancestries comes out at the beginning of April. It has 21 ancestry options, not sure if that's 21 ancestries or also includes versatile heritage and Starfinder heritages for PF2e ancestries. I suspect this will be the most ancestries we get at one time in SF2e
Starfinder Absalom Station comes out around August. Has one SF1e ancestry and one new ancestry.
The cover features a goblin (so space goblin heritage would likely come), a bantrid, and an Izalguun.
Additionally, Formians, moonflower leshies, Azrinarans (Void Elves, formerly drow, likely an elf heritage), and a playable ooze people are confirmed,
I think it's safe to assume at least the Pathfinder core races, Elf, Orc, Leshy, Halfling, and Gnome would be included.
Oh, well in that case, I most definitely will be purchasing that book upon it's release. One of the main ancestries I wanted added to 2e was formians, and I had no idea formians were confirmed.
I've liked formians since 1e, I wish they had been given more lore. In most books in 1e formian lore and history seemed entirely nonexistent aside from a few specific events, and I've always wondered what's up with the formians. They used to be always overshadowed by the lashunta.
Driftbourne
|
I've liked formians since 1e, I wish they had been given more lore. In most books in 1e formian lore and history seemed entirely nonexistent aside from a few specific events, and I've always wondered what's up with the formians. They used to be always overshadowed by the lashunta.
Are you referring to PF1e or SF1e? Formians originated in PF1e. In SF1e, they are in the book Interstellar Species, which gave each playable species in it 4 pages, most of which is lore.
| kaid |
Erm, ackschualualy. Formians originated as a D&D creature.
Though that's probably why the lore is sparce. I have a similar issue where bugbears have very little Golarion lore, and it urks me, because I've been curious to see what it'd be like if they got the goblin/hobgoblin treatment.
I think the lore/art/descriptions are different enough for formians to not be an issue. Basically the word formian would basically mean ant like so pretty generic.
| Chocolate Milkshake |
I'm feeling the autism today so here's a list of the SF1e races native to the Pact Worlds system that haven't been added to either game's 2e or confirmed for Galactic Ancestries:
•Anassanoi (The Sun; Not technically native but I think they've been there for a while)
•Dirindi (Arkanen)
•Giants (Golarion; might be complicated lorewise by thr existence of Jotunborn)
•Haan (Bretheda)
•Kanabo (Golarion; basically Hobgoblin Hungerseed)
•Maraquoi (Marata)
•Nuar (Golarion; will probably be folded into Minotaurs)
•Ryphorians (Triaxus)
•Sazarons (Arkanen)
•SRO (Everywhere; confirmed for tech book I think)
•Trox (Nchak)
•Urogs (Dykon)
•Varculaks (Versatile Heritage material but lore suggests the phenomenon originated on Golarion)
•Verthani (Verces; also confirmed for tech book I think)
•Witchwyrds (Golarion; also not native but they've definitely been around)
•Xulgaths (Golarion)
| Squark |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I'm feeling the autism today so here's a list of the SF1e races native to the Pact Worlds system that haven't been added to either game's 2e or confirmed for Galactic Ancestries:
•Anassanoi (The Sun; Not technically native but I think they've been there for a while)
•Dirindi (Arkanen)
•Giants (Golarion; might be complicated lorewise by thr existence of Jotunborn)
•Haan (Bretheda)
•Kanabo (Golarion; basically Hobgoblin Hungerseed)
•Maraquoi (Marata)
•Nuar (Golarion; will probably be folded into Minotaurs)
•Ryphorians (Triaxus)
•Sazarons (Arkanen)
•SRO (Everywhere; confirmed for tech book I think)
•Trox (Nchak)
•Urogs (Dykon)
•Varculaks (Versatile Heritage material but lore suggests the phenomenon originated on Golarion)
•Verthani (Verces; also confirmed for tech book I think)
•Witchwyrds (Golarion; also not native but they've definitely been around)
•Xulgaths (Golarion)
Nuar will be in Absalom Station, along with Gnarefuroids.
Driftbourne
|
I'm courious to see how the Gnarefuroids turn out like, although they first appeared in Mechageddon! as a creature, I think it's the first new ancestry that hasn't been playable before. I'm wondering what size they will be since the ones in Mechageddon! are gargantuan, I'm assuming they will be large. But it will be nice to have a new ancestry that can't be compared to SF1e or Pathfinder ancestries.
| Perpdepog |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
moosher12 wrote:I think the lore/art/descriptions are different enough for formians to not be an issue. Basically the word formian would basically mean ant like so pretty generic.Erm, ackschualualy. Formians originated as a D&D creature.
Though that's probably why the lore is sparce. I have a similar issue where bugbears have very little Golarion lore, and it urks me, because I've been curious to see what it'd be like if they got the goblin/hobgoblin treatment.
Formians are extraplanar beings from a plane of law in D&D, IIRC, so them being aliens in PF is already a fair departure from their D&D lore, too.
Also, bugbear is in a similar boat; D&D didn't coin the term by any stretch. I'd also be down to see bugbears get a brush-up to their lore. Creatures called bugbears tend to have pretty diverse backgrounds. (My personal fave are the ones from Shadow of the Weird Wizard where they are all fey cursed to lose their eyes, which they have since replaced with silver coins minted in Hell, and thus need to kidnap people and drag them down there in order to trade for replacements when their eyes get tarnished.)
| moosher12 |
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Watching the STF Conline, and apparently Breneris (the otter folk), Dwarves, Elves, Novians (mini suns?), Talphi (A molefolk on Vesk 4), and Orocorans are confirmed for Galactic Ancestries. Poppets are confirmed NOT there.
Greys are explained to be "Not yet, but popular." Which if some of you remember a few old threads about the greys, makes me wonder if they'll be getting an Ikeshti-style thematic makeover. They said they wanted to focus on alien species that are more uniquely Starfinder first, though.
| Perpdepog |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Watching the STF Conline, and apparently Breneris (the otter folk), Dwarves, Elves, Novians (mini suns?), Talphi (A molefolk on Vesk 4), and Orocorans are confirmed for Galactic Ancestries. Poppets are confirmed NOT there.
Yep; novians are little sun-people from Starfinder Enhanced. I'm pleased but not super surprised to hear Novians are making a return even after showing up so late in 1E's lifecycle. They're fun little guys who really fit the particular flavor of gonzo Starfinder has been cultivating.
I hope they get feats that let you make yourself larger or smaller while manipulating your density or something.Greys are explained to be "Not yet, but popular." Which if some of you remember a few old threads about the greys, makes me wonder if they'll be getting an Ikeshti-style thematic makeover. They said they wanted to focus on alien species that are more uniquely Starfinder first, though.
That makes me really, really happy to hear. My first and so far only Starfinder character I got to play with was a grey. I'd love to make them in the new edition with new, and likely more interesting, lore behind them.
| Chocolate Milkshake |
Watching the STF Conline, and apparently Breneris (the otter folk), Dwarves, Elves, Novians (mini suns?), Talphi (A molefolk on Vesk 4), and Orocorans are confirmed for Galactic Ancestries. Poppets are confirmed NOT there.
Greys are explained to be "Not yet, but popular." Which if some of you remember a few old threads about the greys, makes me wonder if they'll be getting an Ikeshti-style thematic makeover. They said they wanted to focus on alien species that are more uniquely Starfinder first, though.
I don't know what people were saying about the ayy lmaos, but the approach I was thinking of was to highlight the existence of grey exiles who'd had their memories erased. That way we could have a plausible origin story for grey PCs while still keeping their society and motives under wraps for later.
Also, in my list above I realized I forgot uplifted bears. I'm wondering whether they'll be folded into awakened animals or remain their own thing.
| moosher12 |
I'd imagine they'd be folded into awakened animals. As for Greys, the big problem with greys is they had the Ikeshti problem of being a bit uncomfortable in theme at times. And as a result, there was a period where Paizo said they were unlikely to come back. So making them a more acceptable brand of evil will likely be their due.
| griefninja |
I'd love to see the Entu become playable in 2e. I wonder how they'd work. The image in my mind is something like the Venom symbiote from Marvel, even though the entu are more specifically fungus instead of generic alien slime. They could be a versatile heritage you apply to any ancestry for the host, and Awakened Animal being the go-to for uplifted species like those batfolk. They could also be their own full ancestry with heritages based on their host like animal, sentient, and independent colony. Normally, I'm not a fan of various "animal people" but PF's Awoken Animals are a really clean catch-all way of handling the idea.
| kaid |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Watching the STF Conline, and apparently Breneris (the otter folk), Dwarves, Elves, Novians (mini suns?), Talphi (A molefolk on Vesk 4), and Orocorans are confirmed for Galactic Ancestries. Poppets are confirmed NOT there.
Greys are explained to be "Not yet, but popular." Which if some of you remember a few old threads about the greys, makes me wonder if they'll be getting an Ikeshti-style thematic makeover. They said they wanted to focus on alien species that are more uniquely Starfinder first, though.
Funny thing about poppets is basically SRO could easily be Poppets of SF2. Your animated transformer robot toy gains a soul and becomes an SRO.
| Chocolate Milkshake |
I'd imagine they'd be folded into awakened animals. As for Greys, the big problem with greys is they had the Ikeshti problem of being a bit uncomfortable in theme at times. And as a result, there was a period where Paizo said they were unlikely to come back. So making them a more acceptable brand of evil will likely be their due.
Was there some reveal about their motives I'm not aware of or are alien abductions off-limits now?
| moosher12 |
No reveals were needed, all information that was problematic could already be found in the Alien Archive entry featuring them.
More info of this old conversation can basically be found in this old thread
But essentially, an old Discord post from devs insinuated that greys had a real chance of being cut, especially since at the time, reptoids were confirmed cut, and Ikeshti's had retcons applied to their lore. So we were expecting greys would either be cut or get the Ikeshti treatment.
| Perpdepog |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
No reveals were needed, all information that was problematic could already be found in the Alien Archive entry featuring them.
More info of this old conversation can basically be found in this old thread
But essentially, an old Discord post from devs insinuated that greys had a real chance of being cut, especially since at the time, reptoids were confirmed cut, and Ikeshti's had retcons applied to their lore. So we were expecting greys would either be cut or get the Ikeshti treatment.
Rooting for the latter, myself. I like how Ikeshtis turned out in 2E quite a lot; they feel much more like people now, ones capable of thinking about themselves and their societies, which they really didn't previously.
Driftbourne
|
No reveals were needed, all information that was problematic could already be found in the Alien Archive entry featuring them.
More info of this old conversation can basically be found in this old thread
But essentially, an old Discord post from devs insinuated that greys had a real chance of being cut, especially since at the time, reptoids were confirmed cut, and Ikeshti's had retcons applied to their lore. So we were expecting greys would either be cut or get the Ikeshti treatment.
I just want to point out that the thread linked to had several posts removed by Paizo, so the first post in that thread is not the OP.
| Chocolate Milkshake |
No reveals were needed, all information that was problematic could already be found in the Alien Archive entry featuring them.
More info of this old conversation can basically be found in this old thread
But essentially, an old Discord post from devs insinuated that greys had a real chance of being cut, especially since at the time, reptoids were confirmed cut, and Ikeshti's had retcons applied to their lore. So we were expecting greys would either be cut or get the Ikeshti treatment.
I see. Comparing alien abductions to SA seems like a massive stretch to me, but knowing how the writers are, to die on that hill is to die in vain.
| moosher12 |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Well, it's less the abduction itself, and more that the abductions of greys themselves are very invasive. People being captured in 'paralytic' abductions. Being sedated, stripped, experimented on, and left with new additions to their body they never asked for, as happens to the victim in this Iconic Encounter story. In the case of this, they are comatose, but otherwise, you typically have little to no memory of the ordeal when you survive according to the Alien Archive.
Abductions would probably still be there, but I would not be surprised if the nature of the abductions were taken toward a less dark route, with a more conventional horror aspect instead.
| Justnobodyfqwl |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I think it's worth mentioning that the idea that abduction equals assault and any moral argument against Greys are NOT what Jenny or any Starfinder dev said.
The biggest thing Jenny allegedly said is the strike against Greys in a discord server: they're just too generic! She said they dev team would probably want to do any number of aliens that they're passionate about and are unique to Starfinder before they do Greys.
It's kind of a shame tbh, because I think that's one of the biggest STRENGTHS of Greys. There are so few universally recognized aliens compared to universally recognized fantasy ancestries. The pre-existing attachment people have to funny little big-headed Greys with ray guns is actually a huge draw!
| griefninja |
I wonder how Space Goblins will be handled. Now that 2e has ancestries and heritages instead of races and subraces, I could see Space Goblins going either way. They could be either a whole new ancestry, with Space themed heritages, or just a single heritage for the existing goblins. Them being a bit taller and more intelligent already makes them similar to hobgoblins as well, so either way I doubt there'd be room for a Space Hobgob. It would be kinda funny if the 2E debut of bugbears as a player option was in a SF book instead of a PF book.
| Squark |
I wonder how Space Goblins will be handled. Now that 2e has ancestries and heritages instead of races and subraces, I could see Space Goblins going either way. They could be either a whole new ancestry, with Space themed heritages, or just a single heritage for the existing goblins. Them being a bit taller and more intelligent already makes them similar to hobgoblins as well, so either way I doubt there'd be room for a Space Hobgob. It would be kinda funny if the 2E debut of bugbears as a player option was in a SF book instead of a PF book.
Hobgoblins and Space Goblins are still very distinct. Space Goblins continue their goblin-y antics but IN SPAAAACE, while Hobgoblins have two civilizations in Near Space (with a fair number of Space Goblin Citizens, admittedly)- The Gideron Authority and Marixah Republic, which are on the brink of war with each other.
| moosher12 |
Space goblins were canonically an evolutionary offshoot of normal goblins as according to 1E books. But I feel they'd be a heritage. Mostly because it'd be easier to handle to let the new dominant heritage have access to all the normal goblin feats, then to have to give a whole new race a different list, because while you can reprint some goblin feats to the space goblin, you're not gonna have the page space to reprint them all, meaning that if it's a different ancestry, then it will lose access to all the uncoverted goblin feats, which would be problematic.
I'm also hoping that Azrinaran Elves get the same treatment as being a heritage.
(On top of Azrinaran Elves, I hope we get an Asana Elf heritage.)