Irontruth wrote:
If it's not your theory, you could stop defending it any time, but you've now spent 3 days defending it.... so trying to claim that it isn't your theory sounds really hollow.
Saying that your wild speculation has less support than direct statements in the email that every news outlet picked up 7 years ago is pointing out the flaws in YOUR theory. Not supporting the other.
“Irontruth” wrote:
A consensus opinion is just an argument ad populem.
And the opinion of an historian is just the speculation of a industry outsider trying desperately to be relevant on the internet.
“Irontruth” wrote:
Feel free to present the definitive evidence you keep saying exists. Your failure to do so though is speaking volumes though.
My “failure to do so?” As stated before, I’m not here to engage in the narrative you are trying to construct.
You know the emails I’m referring to and the quotes that support the consensus opinion the other poster was asking about. You even quoted around them yourself. I’m not going quote for quote with you.
Why is this so important to you?