
![]() |

I've had this come up a couple times now, especially as these later scenarios are fairly full of difficult-to-obtain treasure bundles where in some it's near impossible to get all ten - for example, in 1-19 there's a bundle that's tied to having someone at the table get a critical success on a Society check - this will be a missed bundle over 50% of the time.
However, what troubles me is the Grand Archive Meticulous Appraisal Service Boon where a GA player can spend 2 Fame to get an extra TB if some were missed. I've had it come up twice now, and it's almost impossible for the GA player to refuse this to everybody else at the table without feeling bad, but it's also the case that, especially at low levels, a single TB is hardly worth 2 Fame.
I feel like this is intended to create situations where the GA player gets to feel great that they're saving the day for the party, but that hasn't happened yet. In practice the cost of this Service often isn't worth it, and both times the player kinda begrudgingly spent the Fame. Everybody at the table can say "No hard feelings if you choose not to" but in reality nobody likes to feel like they're being the bad guy.
I don't like this - it either shouldn't have a cost or should work like a slottable Faction boon - the GA player could choose to slot this at the start of the session and the extra TB will be gained at the end if needed. That, I think, would have the intended effect - if you slotted this boon you are a hero at the end of the scenario if it was necessary, and if you didn't slot it, there's no pressure.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

There's still the open issue of 'do you need to have an open/unused slot to use a service boon'. So its equally wasted either way under some interpretations.
So far at the tables where I've played/GMd its always been the GA player(s) to offer, rather than anyone asking "Any GA player", but I can see with increased awareness of the boon, that might change.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

... but it's also the case that, especially at low levels, a single TB is hardly worth 2 Fame ...
I'll happily concede the point that no one should feel compelled to to spend Fame (or other resources) because other players expect it. But, I wanted to come back to the value of that 2 fame expenditure.
There's an all factions boon, available at tier 0 (ie, as soon as you have any fame) that kind of sets the bar for gp value for boons. The Wayfinder all factions boon. For 2 Fame, you can own a level 2 magic item worth 28 gold. You'd have to be 8th level before a single treasure bundle gets to 30gp.
Meticulous Appraisal is a Tier 2 boon for Grand Archive members. Which means you need to have a 30 reputation (which means you earned 30 fame) and are probably half way through 3rd level. Assuming you spent a few fame on other things AND you are banking 25 fame for that emergency Raise Dead -- That means you'll likely be 4th level before you want to consider using Meticulous Appraisal. Your treasure bundles there are worth 10 gp each. So maybe not as valuable as the Wayfinder boon, but if you multiply that by 6 players, you've given 60gp back to the table. Which is pretty useful.
If you compare that to the other boon I see a lot of people using, Storied Talent (Horizon Hunters, Tier 2). That costs you 4 Fame. Granted, you only have to buy it once and slot it. A normal third level character could earn 1.6 gp per session (trained success, lvl 1 task) and the Storied talent player can earn 4 gp per session (trained success, lvl 3 task). Net 2.4 gp per session difference. Jumps to a 3.2gp per session difference at 4th level.
So Storied Talent is looking at roughly 10 sessions to match the 30gp of the wayfinder boon. But since he paid 4 fame, they really need 20 sessions to break even against that mark -- assuming they always get a success. Takes longer if you fail a few dice rolls.
Compare it to Meticulous Appraisal. The HH Storied Talent player will take roughly four sessions to make up the 10 gold he lost from one treasure bundle at fourth level (again, depending on dice rolls). The GA Meticulous Appraisal player gets to keep that treasure bundle AND still make an Earn Income check.
Agreed, no one should feel pressured to spend their resources because the table didn't get a treasure bundle. But I don't think Meticulous Appraisal is a losing trade by any stretch. Even as low as fourth level.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

While I very much appreciate the sentiment of the OP, I think the problem lies with the players, not the system.
Healers can sometimes be put into similar situations. Whom to heal and how, and if?
In the end, players that put pressure on other players purely for their own gain should be talked to by an event organizer. It is not cool and not what the OPF and game stands for.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not everybody has the same level of teamwork, especially with something there which is optional. If a Grand Archive uses the boon in the event of incomplete rewards, fine but otherwise I won't lose sleep and they can't be blamed for that.
Like I said in another topic, players should start to budget not having all the treasure bundles. As long the healer as a good reason to withhold the spellcasting, nor I'd blame that.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I, for one, think the Meticulous Appraisal boon is definitely worth it. I don't think it's entirely fair to compare it only to the Wayfinder boon, as that one, by itself is obviously very good. As someone above pointed out, it compares positively to the Storied Talent boon, not to mention it affects the whole table.
I've actually doled out more Meticulous Appraisals as a PC than I've received (which means I've had a highly disproportionate amount spent on this given that most tables I've played at have 6 people). I'd agree, pressuring a low-level PC to use this boon isn't a great idea, but pointing out *that it exists* is probably worth it, as Faction Boons are not necessarily something everyone knows about, and not necessarily this one in particular.
As a closing, yeah, this sounds like a player issue... not an issue with the boon itself. Beyond this, it's supposed to be "Explore, Report, Cooperate", right? If you're either a) too stingy to want to spend your fame to help the table, or b) heavily depending on others to spend their fame to help you while not contributing your expendable resources as well, then I'd argue that you're not really PFS'ing right to begin with.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

I do feel I might have contributed to the problem last week, when I (as GM) reminded a GA player about the existence of the boon in public rather than via a private channel. I just didn't want to have to redo chronicles after the GA player remembered an hour or two later.