Compilation of Rules Clarifications and Errata

[Unikatze]

The Devs are usually very active at answering rules specific questions and clarifying print errors before an official errata is released.

The problem I've found is sometimes these answers are hidden withing pages and pages of posts and comments and are not easily accessible.

So I'm putting together a list of clarifications, comments or fixes that the Devs have addressed at some point, so that it can be compiled in a sort of FAQ.
Nanmaniac from pf2.easytool.es has also agreed to add them to his site once we've compiled enough.
So for example, if you go to Sun Blade, it will specify that the text is wrong, and on a failure it does not deal full damage like the CRB says, because Mark Seifter clarified it here https://paizo.com/threads/rzs42t39?Sun-Blade-Confusion#7

So, if any of you know of more clarifications, either in forums or blogs, please post them below and I'll add them to the list.
Here's the list, but you might need to request access if you want to edit it yourselves.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hYULac1-WVy0AELJvdoUVG0T9zQx7im_8yG ii6vpA2M/edit?usp=sharing

[Syri]

Oh, that link's broken! Let me fix that for you: Click here for the spreadsheet
You've set the link so that anyone can edit, so we don't need to request access.

I also changed the spreadsheet's title from "Official Blog Comments" to "Paizo Staff Comments", as not all of these clarifications are sourced from blogs, and we don't want to give the false impression that an off-the-cuff answer from a single developer is necessarily official. They can misspeak or be misinterpreted, and/or even be overruled when the game design team as a whole later confers together to check and see if prior interpretations have brought up any new concerns they hadn't fully considered before; formal errata documents that they all agree upon, get revised by Paizo's editing team, and finally publish are what's official.

[Aratorin]

Shouldn't this be in the rules forum?