| Bref |
I am usually told I look like a young Hugh Laurie. Sadly I do not have a pic of a hot model to demonstrate
| Bref |
and speaking of butts, that film I linked to has mine in it. so if it ever plays in NY again you ahve been warned!
| Bref |
| Cуровую зиму |
Bref
Seriously? You think that would phase me? That's cute but not even a 1 on a scale of 10. When working in finance or at club there are a hundred worse alpha man comments that I don't even bother me because I am so used to them. No worries, your still my favorite goblin.
| Douglas Muir 406 |
mind, this is a pair whose *least* NSFW song is probably "Sex With Ducks". So, heads up on that.
Meanwhile, unrelated to anything, this made me smile: http://thugkitchen.com/
Okay, going to bed. If you guys come up with a plan of action to do stuff, I'll be happy to tell you what happens tomorrow morning.
| Cуровую зиму |
And Zimu, for some reason that makes me wonder if you've ever listened to Garfunkel and Oates.
Maybe a little, hard to miss it when it's part of Americana.
Wait I am thinking of simon and garfunkel/hall and oates.
| Douglas Muir 406 |
Garfunkel and Oates are... okay hang on a sec.
Here are a couple of the cleaner ones.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=groaPrY41Rk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilOx2Jmm1r4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJRzBpFjJS8
They're just starting to break out of the "post clever things on YouTube" niche -- the short one has been getting small roles on TV, the tall one has a solo career that's starting to take off, and their latest CD actually got produced and published. (But *I* was a fan back when nobody knew about them!!!)
| Cуровую зиму |
The dice roller seems to kindly favor me here recently, not bad rolls and in my 1st Ed game my lowly Cleric/Ranger just dropped six out of nine gnolls surrounding her in four rounds.
So .... future hit points
1d6 + 2 ⇒ (6) + 2 = 8
| Jax Naismith |
Nice rolling! Sorry for the long delay in response! Part of it is only checking once yesterday the other part is having accidentally cleared my cache which logged me out of Paizo and as a result the bookmark I use didn't say: "Gameplay (X unread posts)" it just said Gameplay.
| Judge Tohram Quasangi |
Lol - I did that as well and was very surprised that I had no posts one evening. When I clicked to post a comment and it wanted me to log in, I suddenly realized what had happened.
| Dren of the Dark Tapestry |
With this thread, I was checking twice a day, for a while you guys were posting about 50+ times per day. It's settled down now to a normal state, although I wish we were posting a little more :].
| Jax Naismith |
Maybe lesser shadows that take half from mundane and full from magic weapons? Yeah, yeah? :D For once, Jax can tear into something!
| Cуровую зиму |
Zimu's force missile and Bref's attack are too much for the shadow. Its insubstantial form shreds like tissue paper and dissipates, leaving only a wave of cold and a thin, diminishing shriek in your minds.
One down...
Your mention of tissue paper and 'one down' and black toilet paper in Japan made me think of Bref as the spokes goblin for 'Shadow brand TP' - for when your discerning goblin needs to make poo 'art'.
| Judge Tohram Quasangi |
No clue, I just consider him to be at 11 Str (-6 from full). Since Eidolon's cannot die, they simply get sent back to their home plane and then can be resummoned the following day at 1/2 hp. I assume that if he was drained all the way, he would get banished home for 24 hours. As far as the ability drain, my assumption is that he can recover 2/day while resting, or 1/day while travelling. I doubt the 4/day for constant care would be applicable as what LE/NE character is going to provide constant long term care to an Eidolon.
| Jax Naismith |
LE/NE characters who are slaves to the whims of Asmodeus' champions, that's who. Once we get out of this dungeon, I'm sure we can convince some servants to provide constant care for Morsum as long as Judge is awake.
| Bref |
Logic no good here Bloodlicker!
Also I think that Nat 20 should represent Bref taking the hit on purpose and shaking it off, and gaining an extra level for awesomeness.
| Bref |
| Douglas Muir 406 |
This is pretty cool!
Hmm.
At low levels, that feat is sick overpowered. You already have Acrobatics +11. So, if something hits you for 10 points of damage, you only have to roll a 4 to avoid the damage. You'll bounce 10' away -- that's a wash, could be good or bad, depending -- and then you're staggered for one round. Staggered means you can move /or/ attack, but you still get a 5' step, so unless you're avoiding 10 or more points of damage you'll be right back in the combat.
Now, because melee damage tends to rise faster than skills, this will become less awesome at high levels (though still pretty sweet). Also, once you start getting iterative attacks, the Staggered condition becomes more of a PITA. But even at high levels it's still a good feat, and at low levels it's almost stupid. If you took this as your 3rd level feat, you'd immediately have a 50% chance of avoiding a melee attack doing 18 points of damage, and attacks doing 8 or less points of damage you could auto-ignore.
It's obviously a nice thematic fit with the whole Bouncy Manic Goblin thing, but it looks kind of broken to me.
Doug M.
| Jax Naismith |
Bref wrote:This is pretty cool!Hmm.
At low levels, that feat is sick overpowered. You already have Acrobatics +11. So, if something hits you for 10 points of damage, you only have to roll a 4 to avoid the damage. You'll bounce 10' away -- that's a wash, could be good or bad, depending -- and then you're staggered for one round. Staggered means you can move /or/ attack, but you still get a 5' step, so unless you're avoiding 10 or more points of damage you'll be right back in the combat.
Now, because melee damage tends to rise faster than skills, this will become less awesome at high levels (though still pretty sweet). Also, once you start getting iterative attacks, the Staggered condition becomes more of a PITA. But even at high levels it's still a good feat, and at low levels it's almost stupid. If you took this as your 3rd level feat, you'd immediately have a 50% chance of avoiding a melee attack doing 18 points of damage, and attacks doing 8 or less points of damage you could auto-ignore.
It's obviously a nice thematic fit with the whole Bouncy Manic Goblin thing, but it looks kind of broken to me.
Doug M.
The feat does mention you have to round up. So if an attack does 6+ points of damage, he won't be able to engage that target that turn.
Edit: Ouch, is only useful in large open areas as well. He can pick the direction of the movement but it still provokes attacks and causes damage if he hits an enemy/wall/object.
| Bref |
:P
dont worry about FRA's because goblin here is taking the Vital Strike chain!
| Douglas Muir 406 |
The feat does mention you have to round up. So if an attack does 6+ points of damage, he won't be able to engage that target that turn.
You do have to round up, so that's a point.
Ouch, is only useful in large open areas as well. He can pick the direction of the movement but it still provokes attacks and causes damage if he hits an enemy/wall/object.
1d4 of damage when you may be avoiding 15 or 20? I didn't even bother mentioning that. In fact, a tactically cunning player could choose to take the movement in a direction that's blocked, eating the d4 damage in order to stay in place.
Doug M.
| Jax Naismith |
Jax Naismith wrote:
The feat does mention you have to round up. So if an attack does 6+ points of damage, he won't be able to engage that target that turn.
You do have to round up, so that's a point.
Jax Naismith wrote:Ouch, is only useful in large open areas as well. He can pick the direction of the movement but it still provokes attacks and causes damage if he hits an enemy/wall/object.1d4 of damage when you may be avoiding 15 or 20? I didn't even bother mentioning that. In fact, a tactically cunning player could choose to take the movement in a direction that's blocked, eating the d4 damage in order to stay in place.
Doug M.
Yeah, I'd be more worried about the stagger + knocked prone and/or opportunity attacks.