Direct contradiction in FAQ on two-handed weapons in one hand

[James Risner]

Gauss wrote:

even the Devs have stated that they appear to contradict each other.

I'd bet a dinner anywhere in Indianapolis at GenCon on me this isn't true. Why am I confident? Because I vividly remember the exact opposite.

[Gauss]

At least in one instance SKR stated that there is a language issue that should be looked at by the Dev team.

Here Mark Seifter states he is uncomfortable with the inconsistent Lance FAQ.

There may be others but I don't want to spend more time digging.

No, I didn't find a specific statement by a Dev that they appear to contradict each other, I found statements of that there is a language problem and one of inconsistency.

But I am not spending all day trying to find every reference by every dev on this topic. Nor am I searching through my PMs with Devs because that would be inappropriate to present as evidence. It is possible the statement I am remembering was in a PM with a Dev.

The two above quotes should be adequate to show that yes, the Devs have indicated that there may be a problem here that needs looking at.

Now we just need the FAQ hits so that it is on the list of things to address.

[KingOfAnything]

Alright, I'll click the FAQ button. I'd be just fine if this question was summarily marked as 'answered in FAQ', though.

[James Risner]

I'd say that by virtue of the problem wasn't corrected in 4 years, it isn't inconsistent. They have, on several occasions, fixed contradictory information. So if they believed it conflicted, it'd been fixed by now.

I'm clicking your FAQ because the issue comes up, not because I feel there is a conflict.

[Gauss]

Thanks King, James. (hehehe, see what I did there? :P)

[Ravingdork]

Not FAQing as there is no direct contradiction. FAQing in this instance really only invites opportunity for a nerfing. This one is best left alone.