PbP Community MTS II - Blood under Absalom GM Discussion Thread [spoilers]


GM Discussion

401 to 450 of 549 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | next > last >>
4/5

I read it as the trap goes off, whether on the sliding PCs or the walking cautious ones. Either way they are close enough to the scrum to get the attention of the elementals with the glitterdust, and initiate combat.

1/5

@shifty -

Does the mausoleum count as a building for the purpose of Favored Terrain?

Grand Lodge 2/5 5/5 *

My party just rang the gong successfully and is progressing towards the slip and slide.

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

@NN - Urban (buildings, streets, and sewers), and Underground (caves and dungeons).

1/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Shifty wrote:

@NN - Urban (buildings, streets, and sewers), and Underground (caves and dungeons).

Excellent, now I don't have to retcon the party finding the trap. Thanks.

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

Elemental wave reporting:
HERE

Output/Results
HERE

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Reporting
I have added each GM (including backups) to the Delegated Reporter list. This allows you to simply issue chronicles and report the data like a normal session.

Event name: PbP Community Multi Table Special II
Event number: 85936

If you have any issues/dramas/etc please let me know.

Boon rolls
Each table is entitled to boon rolls.
Each GM & Player may participate.
A boon is won on a 1 or a 20 on a d20.
If a boon is won, the winner needs to roll 1d3.
Please send me just the thread link to the win.
I will post in that thread, and get the boon to the player/gm.

4/5

Boon Roll - GM first or last?


I'm sorry - I am confused by that last overseer message. What does GM- M5 info mean?

My group (who has slowed to a crawl) was already past M1, but not yet to M5. Do they just continue, or am I meant to jump them to M5?

(I am working with little coffee in the veins, so excuse me if I am just missing it...)

4/5 5/55/55/55/5 *****

That is the link where your group can report successes in M5.

Just slide them down the chute, man! Wheeee!

Grand Lodge 2/5 5/5 *

My group has an oracle... with dismissal. And the elementals have abysmal will saves. This is going rather quickly. I somehow suspect once they finish off the first wave that the second wave may be 1 round.

Grand Lodge 2/5 5/5 *

Out of curiosity, will we be skipping the 'everyone rolls until a 20 shows up' part at the end or do you have some sort of alternate conclusion in mind?

Scarab Sages 3/5 5/5 *

As a player I have a question that might be best for Shifty to rule on. What happens if I use a teleportation effect to try and just bypass these elementals and touch the guy?

I'm assuming the scenario wants us to hit things for a bit, so I don't want to screw anything up. Especially if the scenario doesn't have a way to handle players doing that, but I feel like if my character has the means to do it and end the contest, he'd certainly try.

Grand Lodge 2/5 5/5 *

One of my players asked that. I just warned them that they may start the remaining encounters early and all-together.

4/5 5/55/55/55/5 *****

The Man Behind the Curtain wrote:
Out of curiosity, will we be skipping the 'everyone rolls until a 20 shows up' part at the end or do you have some sort of alternate conclusion in mind?

There is an alternate conclusion. We have an adaption of the scenario for PbP:

PBP Conversion Document wrote:
Overseer Posts Overseer text in both columns on page 46 - skipping the Roll a natural 20 roll race between the two overseer sections. Instead the Overseer should roll against a list of tables and pick a “winning” table at random. Then the Overseer should pick a PC name from the “winning” table and insert it into the second part of the overseer text. Example “From the throng of warriors, a single arm reaches forth and <insert PC name here> touches the Emissary. Slowly, he opens his eyes...”.

So, we're not rolling. Shifty is.

Hmm

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

@GM Kashka - Boon Roll, historically it is GM first.

@GM Fuzzfoot - I was posting up the link early so it can be easily found when you get there, not that you are expected to be there. Please progress as normal :) There's always these super quick groups speeding along so I need to get these things in ahead of them. As it is, three tables have already whumped their first wave.

@Sir Godfrey - this question comes up every time, everything from teleport, to D'Doors, to Invis and running. I'm taking it as an assumption that his amazing tardis-like elemental sphere and rune-etched steps on the dais are "plot magick'd" to prevent such chicanery. Similar to how there are current over 100 Pathfinders and 60 Elementals (ranging from Small to Elder) in that room right now. The only way this works is with some handwave, otherwise the blast effects and crossfire would be wasting junior Pathfinders left and right, in the same way the second wave would also be being hit...

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

GM Boons

GM Boons are out. Please check your emails - if nothing received, please let me know.

Player Boons
For those of us not currently at a table:
Overseer
Andrew Torgerud
Evil Minion
GM Evil
GM Erich
IHiYC
6d20 ⇒ (7, 8, 8, 15, 6, 6) = 50
(Sorry!)

1/5

So ah...I just notice that the DC for Tier 5-6 blind trap is 12, but 14 for Tier 3-4 and 20 or Tier 8-9. What should it be for Tier 5-6, obviously not 12.

Grand Lodge 2/5 5/5 *

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I've got one boon winner at my table:

Jin-Goro's Boon

1/5

N N 959 wrote:
So ah...I just notice that the DC for Tier 5-6 blind trap is 12, but 14 for Tier 3-4 and 20 or Tier 8-9. What should it be for Tier 5-6, obviously not 12.

I caught this too, N N 959. I went with 16.

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Shifty wrote:

Elemental wave reporting:

HERE

Output/Results
HERE

Count is 6/12

Once we hit 9/12 the first wave for all tables is destroyed, and the players not already engaged with the second wave can move to the second wave.

IF in the meantime someone defeats their SECOND wave, please report the name of the person who got the final hit to me ASAP.

There is no 'third wave' :)

Lantern Lodge 4/5 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

And I have a player win a boon

Grand Lodge 2/5 5/5 *

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Player at my table who took out wave 2 was Jin-Goro Gallonica. Via Dismissal. He waved his hand and it went away.

Should I hold for the rest of the tables to catch up?

Dark Archive 4/5 5/55/5 ****

Xukong also won a boon. (Link)

Grand Lodge 2/5 5/5 *

Oh, as a note, I submitted my Elemental results under my standard alias of DebugAMP rather than this alias name. So if you're wondering whose results those are... hi!

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain...

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

The Man Behind the Curtain wrote:

Player at my table who took out wave 2 was Jin-Goro Gallonica. Via Dismissal. He waved his hand and it went away.

Should I hold for the rest of the tables to catch up?

Nope - that kicks us all forward! :)

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

@Aero - Boon sent
@Tyranius - Boon sent

4/5 5/55/55/55/5 *****

I have a winner too -- Sheela.

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

@HMM - Boon sent :)

Scarab Sages 3/5 5/5 *

So uh... our GM hasn't done an in character post since Friday, and an OOC post on Saturday was the last we've heard of him. We actually never got to do anything with the elementals and missed that entire part.

If he doesn't get in touch with us by the end of today I will probably come asking for a substitute so we don't miss the finale.

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Wave reporting:

Monk defeated/Sucess report link

Current count output

8 = Code white
17 = Code grey
24 = Code black

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

@Sir G - Noted. I had a look at the chat logs and the timing, unfortunately by the time all the OOC and Diplomacy checks had taken place some of the other tables just rolled through blisteringly fast.

If your GM isn't on deck in the next 12 hours let me know, but I suspect this fight will be on for a few days :)

4/5

The Room should not have been pushed forward by one "blistering" table.

scenario p.42 wrote:
Once 75% of the tables have vanquished the first wave of elementals, the Overseer GM announces that contestants have broken through the wall of elementals.

they shouldn't have been allowed to move to the platform yet.

Sovereign Court 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I have a boon Winner

Azadeh Talat

Also I must be a bad GM lol, I think my Player's post rate dropped off.....Or I check too often.

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

The scenario is funkily written.

scenario wrote:


When each table has defeated the first wave of elementals, the Table GM should send a runner to inform the Overseer GM of their victory while the rest of the table moves directly into combating the second wave.

So once they drop their first wave, they move on to the Second wave.

Then,

scenario wrote:

Once 75% of the tables have vanquished the first wave of elementals, the Overseer GM announces that contestants have broken through the wall of elementals.

But also says:

scenario wrote:
To break through, each group needs to defeat the second wave of elementals in its subtier.

So 75% first wave defeat shuffles all remaining groups up to the second wave.

Where the problem arises is that some groups mowed the first wave rapidly, and then following the instructions first paragraph engaged and dropped the second wave. This is another funky instance where the scenario could use some editing.

I don't think they anticipated rapid tables blitzing the waves so quickly, but it seems to happen frequently in PFS so it might be another thing best left out of future scenarios.

***

On that note, there will be some bright sparks (100% chance) who will also come up with "but we just have to touch the guy" concept and start running around trying to bypass the defenders and touch the Emissary.

Until he drops all the magic around him, they can't touch him... hands go through etc

He only becomes 'real' when he triggers his lightglobe schtick

In the meantime, it should be looking like THIS - There are presently no less that 110 duking it out on that platform or thereabouts.

Sovereign Court 5/5

That's a very old movie. lol

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
nightdeath wrote:
That's a very old movie. lol

I am firmly of the opinion that this whole scenario was written on a weekend long booze-fuelled bender watching a series of late 70's to mid 80's Martial Arts flicks interspersed with the back catalog of Hal Needham films (Cannonball Run etc)

It would explain not only the content but all the errors too.

Sovereign Court 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I wonder if I'll be the first instance of a GM who has no players as oppposed to a table who had lost its GM? :"P

Grand Lodge 2/5 5/5 *

Well, the monk encounter should be viable with only a couple remaining players... assuming you have any at all.

Grand Lodge 2/5 5/5 *

I think each table is required to finish their final elemental before they can move onto the monk encounter, even if a table triggers the final encounter early. Keep me updated of the overall pace of the finale. I'd rather not have my table cause a sudden end to the scenario before everyone else has a chance to experience it. I'll slow down my pace a bit if needed. Or make sure that when I 'send a runner' to 'inform the overseer of a success' that he might 'trip' on the way 'there.'


Not complaining, just an observation:

I think the problem isn't (just) the scenario, but the translation to PbP.

I think the race through each wave or section is more even paced at a convention because tables can only move so fast. You may have fast and slow variations, but the difference between them will not be huge.

With PbP, my group has been slow through the entire mausoleum when compared to the pace set by the overall progress, but they have been pretty spot-on for a normal PbP scenario. So if they post 2-3 times a day, that would be a fast PbP rate by most standards. But I have seen some groups in these specials hit a rate of 2-3 per hour. They are just going to churn through a whole lot more action, and in this case, there isn't really anything to slow them down.

I think if the special were written for this format, they'd have done some things differently, but at this point, we will just try to hang on!

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

GM Fuzzfoot wrote:

Not complaining, just an observation:

I think the problem isn't (just) the scenario, but the translation to PbP.

I think the race through each wave or section is more even paced at a convention because tables can only move so fast. You may have fast and slow variations, but the difference between them will not be huge.

I dunno, I have run YoTSL and BuA a few times now in both PbP and F2F and player speed is vastly different. I recall on one BuA we still had some people having long and involved chats about what they are going to wear at the Opera and metagaming so hard that the curtains came down during their first round of actual combat. Players stop and debate rules, have side chatter, take ten minutes to make a decision as they equivocate, and the higher the level of players the slower they get to take a turn due to the complexity. In Runecarved Key a couple of weeks ago we had such a mismatch of table speeds I had to check with the GM's if they were running the correct encounters.

Now aside from the dithering, PbP removes a lot of the barriers to time, so that is over to the players, but the time is infinite so people have to take actual action - I appreciate where it was coming from but maybe a Diplomacy check and a conversation with the Elementals was not the most 'forward charging' move, and that's what specials are about - hard charging and active decision making. On my tour around I see an awful lot of OOC Q&A that could have been avoided - there is a distinct lack of 'contingency posting'.

What I mean by contingency posting is that Players can speed things up by giving if/then information in the post, rather than ask a question and await an answer then post an action - which takes significantly more time. In a normal game, ask/reply/do can add one to two days to the resolution of an action. If they are worried about a variable, they can really help out by posting an if/then post.

Anyhow, its a special and yeah we need to remain flexible I suppose :)

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

Monks.

1 down, 23 to go!

4/5 5/55/55/55/5 *****

Great sword guy got a crit, and managed to hit vs the blur. The second monk is providing the group far more of a challenge, though. Those scorching rays are terrifying!

Hmm

4/5 5/55/55/55/5

nightdeath wrote:

I have a boon Winner

Azadeh Talat

Boon sent.

I have issued the boons to everyone I have been told has won one, and have posted in the applicable discussion thread. Keen to get them done quickly now rather than as a massive admin job later...!

1/5

The Man Behind the Curtain wrote:
I think each table is required to finish their final elemental before they can move onto the monk encounter, even if a table triggers the final encounter early.

Is this true? If so, I have some major retconning to do.

Also do they keep fighting monks one at a time, or do they start rolling for 20's after they defeat the one monk?

EDIT: As a data point, my group has been on pace or pretty much the entire scenario, however, they did not even have a chance to engage the 1st wave before the 2nd wave was defeated. In fact, they defeated Judge Heng early. *shrug*

Grand Lodge 2/5 5/5 *

My table just happened to have an oracle with dismissal. As a result, the 2nd wave was done in a single round. Save or bye. It apparently chose bye. This sort of thing has happened to me in face to face specials as well and honestly is just an issue with specials in general. I don't mind success being determined quickly, but I do get a bit annoyed with how it prevents other tables from experiencing sections of the scenario. I would not at all mind if the overseer just sent a runner and/or PM to say "pause, we're going to give other tables time to experience this section."

Honestly, this is my first time being on the 'causing' end of this problem rather than 'receiving' end, but I've been there both in PbP and F2F specials.

N N 959 wrote:
Is this true? If so, I have some major retconning to do.

I'm not entirely certain. That section is a bit awkwardly worded and that was just my interpretation of it. In some ways its contradictory since it says to finish the second wave in the same breath as saying to move onto the final act. I'd suggest avoiding retcons unless you think that the players are losing part of the experience.

1/5

The Man Behind the Curtain wrote:
I'd suggest avoiding retcons unless you think that the players are losing part of the experience.

Given my player table also skipped past the elementals at the last announcement, I'm hoping I did it correctly.

My concern about skipping if not suppose to, would be more about giving the players a free pass. I can tell you that my PC is happy to see the three HUGE elementals go bye-bye.

4/5 5/55/55/55/5 *****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Yeah, I wouldn't retcon. It could be interpreted either way. Let's just do the finale and be done!

Hmm

1/5

Works for me.

401 to 450 of 549 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Organized Play / GM Discussion / PbP Community MTS II - Blood under Absalom GM Discussion Thread [spoilers] All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.