Renee Montoya Returns. And Oracle. And Wally West. And...


Comics


Greg Rucka and Cully Hamner doing two new issues of Renee Montoya as the question as part of DC's Convergence event. Details are here.

Also, Gail Simone and Jan Duursema doing an Oracle and Nightwing Story. A Stephanie Brown Batgirl story. A Wally West story. A Ryan Choi story. Even Damian's back in a Batman and Robin story.

Looking forward to seeing Renee again.


Ryan Choi? Isn't he dead?


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Freehold DM wrote:
Ryan Choi? Isn't he dead?

Comic books.


Freehold DM wrote:
Ryan Choi? Isn't he dead?

Apparently not. And it seems that the pre-Flashpoint DCU has survived in some sort of reality bubble or some such.


And this surprises you?

I may just have to buy some of these. Just to register support for the old world.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I loved Ryan Choi. I loved the sea that a super hero could have a new person take up the mantle without the horrid death of the predecessor. I loved the philosophy parts of the comic. I hated how one of the few Asian superheroes was treated by the "fans".

Dark Archive

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Until this pre-Flashpoint reality becomes the new norm for a few years, I'm not buying into it. DC's gotten my hopes up too many times, only for them to be dashed.


Misroi wrote:
Until this pre-Flashpoint reality becomes the new norm for a few years, I'm not buying into it. DC's gotten my hopes up too many times, only for them to be dashed.

Yeah, I agree. I'm still going to pick up some of this stuff to enjoy what once was and what might be again, some day down the road.


Freehold DM wrote:
I loved Ryan Choi. I loved the sea that a super hero could have a new person take up the mantle without the horrid death of the predecessor. I loved the philosophy parts of the comic. I hated how one of the few Asian superheroes was treated by the "fans".

I have a few thoughts on this:

1) The Atom (the Ray Palmer version with the shrinking belt, as opposed to the Golden Age fighting midget) is pretty iconic.

But "he" hasn't been able to stay in print in a solo series since the 60's, when comic book reading is this country was still widespread, spinner racks were everywhere, and the exile to the specialty shops had yet to happen.

The Atom is kind of similar to Wonder Woman (though her sales have never been as bad). Iconic, everyone knows who the character is, no one particularly wants to buy it. Hawkman is kind of similar.

The "wow" button was a lot easier to push with earlier generations. Now people just don't get into a guy that... shrinks as opposed to moving planets, wielding the power cosmic, or having universal level plot protection (the Batgod).

Seems to me I can think of about 5 or 6 attempts at an Atom monthly. This isn't the first time the Atom's identity has been changed. They even made "Swords and Sorcery" Atom. That didn't sell either.

2) Philosophy in a comic book is niche. Real niche. The comic buying public is smaller as I have said, and yet the fraction of that public that digs philosophy is no larger than it ever was.

3) Why exactly do they have to change the race of a character to make it diverse? If you want to use a Chinese person, why pick on Ray Palmer's gig? You can't make a whole new character?

Maybe that is harder than it looks for DC though. Most of their new characters just don't sell.

It is exceedingly rare for a new character to survive publication, let alone remain popular. It ebbs and flow, but Wolverine is about the only "new" character I can think of (originating after 1970 or so) that has made it to the gold standard.

Ms. Marvel (She is called "Captain Marvel" now? Lame, Marvel needs to do the right thing and let that name go un-trademarked or whatever it is. There is only one Captain Marvel, and his nickname is "The Big Red Cheese.") and characters like Nova and She Hulk have runs for a couple of years, then they go back to limbo or background status.

4) Gail Simone. As nearly as I can tell, the only time I liked her writing was when she wrote Secret Six. She had a knack for the characters and her plots and dialogue fit them.

You can't stick her on just any title and get something that works. I can't imagine what she would do with Fantastic Four or Batman.

Just for fun, imagine her writing Green Lantern.

5) Want to make the Atom work? Or at least be interesting? Find someway to blackmail Alan Moore and get him to sign on to do it for a year or two.

Only thing is only God or Cthulhu would know what you would get.

It would be interesting, but heaven help who tried to follow him on that book.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

If ray died and came back as an Asian man, you might have a point, but he stepped away from the role for a while to get his head right, and another person stepped in. He *is* another character, and one that isn't a stereotype, something both companies have has an issue with with respect to Asian characters. Iirc, he was LOOKING for ray.

Dark Archive

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

For another character like this, you only need point to Jaime Reyes. He had a relatively successful run, but I'm not sure he was ever able to step out from Ted Kord's shadow. I think one thing that helped distinguish Jaime is that while he used the Blue Beetle name, his powers and style was completely different. Ted was a Batman clone who was more happy-go-lucky, mostly due to a far less tragic backstory. Jaime? He's closer to Hal Jordan.


Interesting perspective, mis. One of the most balanced statements I've read.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

If it gets Clark and Lois back together, I'm all for it.

Dark Archive

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Amen, jemstone. In my head, they've never been apart.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
sunbeam wrote:

3) Why exactly do they have to change the race of a character to make it diverse? If you want to use a Chinese person, why pick on Ray Palmer's gig? You can't make a whole new character?

Maybe that is harder than it looks for DC though. Most of their new characters just don't sell.

To me, the approach they took with Ryan Choi seems a valid one to increasing the diversity of a publisher's line-up of superheroes. It's not the only approach, they could, as you said, make up a whole new character. I understand the arguments against legacy characters that are of different race, gender, orientation, etc. than the originals, but I'm up for both approaches co-existing, personally.

Choi taking over the role is also in keeping with the traditions of the DCU, which has along history of legacy characters, characters who take on the mantle of earlier characters. So in a way, Ryan Choi is no different than Wally West, or John Stewart, or Kyle Raner, or Hal Jordan, or Barry Allen, or Tim Drake, or Cassie Cain, or Stephanie Brown, or Kate Kane, or Kendra Saunders, etc. etc.

This is a bit less common at Marvel, but, hey, Miles Morales, awesome character.

sunbeam wrote:
It is exceedingly rare for a new character to survive publication, let alone remain popular. It ebbs and flow, but Wolverine is about the only "new" character I can think of (originating after 1970 or so) that has made it to the gold standard.

If you mean a character known outside of comics fandom, yes, there's not many. I'd add John Stewart in there. If you mean in terms of characters known to comics fans, there have been plenty, actually.

sunbeam wrote:
Ms. Marvel (She is called "Captain Marvel" now? Lame, Marvel needs to do the right thing and let that name go un-trademarked or whatever it is. There is only one Captain Marvel, and his nickname is "The Big Red Cheese.") and characters like Nova and She Hulk have runs for a couple of years, then they go back to limbo or background status.

There was a previous Captain Marvel in the Marvel U, who first appeared in the 60s, so this isn't that new a thing. Carol, whose origin is connected to him, took on his mantle. She's a legacy character in that sense. (Also, not the first woman to be named Captain Marvel - there was Monica Rambeau back in the 80s).

Quite honestly, I'd take Marvel's current Captain Marvel (Carol Danvers) over DC's/Fawcett's Captain Marvel any day of the week. Marvel's decision to turnKelly Sue DeConnick loose on the character was a great one. And the Carol Corps is a wonderful. As is the new inheritor of the Ms. Marvel moniker, Kamala Khan. The Big Red Cheese is fun, but I'll take a superhero who's become something of a feminist icon, and a superhero who has added some much needed diversity to Marvel, both of whom are great and well-written characters, any day of the week.

I guess I'm not seeing any sign of lameness here.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
KSF wrote:
This is a bit less common at Marvel, but, hey, Miles Morales, best character.

Fixed that spelling for you.


Misroi wrote:
For another character like this, you only need point to Jaime Reyes. He had a relatively successful run, but I'm not sure he was ever able to step out from Ted Kord's shadow. I think one thing that helped distinguish Jaime is that while he used the Blue Beetle name, his powers and style was completely different. Ted was a Batman clone who was more happy-go-lucky, mostly due to a far less tragic backstory. Jaime? He's closer to Hal Jordan.

Man, I loved the original Blue Beetle run with Jaime (never bothered with the New52 one. Haven't touched single DC book since the reboot.)

I wasn't super-familiar with Ted, though. Most of my experience with him was in the more humorous Formerly Known As/I Can't It's Not the Justice League series.


I also left out Renee Montoya in my list of legacy characters, to bring things back around to my original post.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
jemstone wrote:
KSF wrote:
This is a bit less common at Marvel, but, hey, Miles Morales, best character.
Fixed that spelling for you.

No argument from me. Love Miles, love Bendis' work on the book, and Pichelli's work, and now Marquez's work.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Kalshane wrote:
Misroi wrote:
For another character like this, you only need point to Jaime Reyes. He had a relatively successful run, but I'm not sure he was ever able to step out from Ted Kord's shadow. I think one thing that helped distinguish Jaime is that while he used the Blue Beetle name, his powers and style was completely different. Ted was a Batman clone who was more happy-go-lucky, mostly due to a far less tragic backstory. Jaime? He's closer to Hal Jordan.

Man, I loved the original Blue Beetle run with Jaime (never bothered with the New52 one. Haven't touched single DC book since the reboot.)

I wasn't super-familiar with Ted, though. Most of my experience with him was in the more humorous Formerly Known As/I Can't It's Not the Justice League series.

Ted Kord, who was himself the replacement for Dan Garret, back before DC bought the character.

Jaime was actually closer to the original, getting powers from the scarab rather than relying on gadgets.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

One of the things I hope to see with the Convergence event is a return to heroes who are heroes because they can make a difference. Every hero in the DCU having "some defining moment of tragedy" gets old really fast. Yes, it's an imperfect world, and yes, sometimes the experience of a great loss motivates people to do good deeds... but often times, people do good not because of what they've lost, but because what they can help other people gain. Ted Kord, Ralph Dibny, any of the Flash Family, you name it - these are all heroes who do what they do not because of the bad things that have happened to them, but because of the good things they can do for other people. Even with the addition of a murder mystery to Barry Allen's backstory (which wasn't originally there), Barry still does the right thing not because of his "moment of darkness," but because he recognizes, rightly so, that these powers give him the ability to help people.

And honestly, as much as I do enjoy several of the New52 titles (Swamp Thing, for instance), one of the things I miss the most about the pre-52 DCU is the heroes who are heroes because they want to be, not because they're perpetually ten years old, watching their parents get gunned down in an alley. :(


Speaking of replacement characters, two issues in and I am enjoying the heck out of the new Thor.

Great work by writer Jason Aaron and artist Russell Dauterman. A Viking goddess superhero flying around, hitting frost giants with a magic hammer? Yes, please.

Dark Archive

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
KSF wrote:
I also left out Renee Montoya in my list of legacy characters, to bring things back around to my original post.

Also known as "The Best Thing to Come Out of 52, Hands Down."


thejeff wrote:

Ted Kord, who was himself the replacement for Dan Garret, back before DC bought the character.

Jaime was actually closer to the original, getting powers from the scarab rather than relying on gadgets.

Oh, I knew who Ted was. (And Jaime's pre-New52 run definitely made sure you were aware of the Blue Beetle legacy.) I'm just saying I didn't read much with him in it outside of the aforementioned humorous mini-series.


Ted to me will always be the one and only blue beetle. I liked Jaime enough in young justice TV series, but the character was given a raw deal death. In keeping with his characterization, yes, but still.


Freehold DM wrote:
Ted to me will always be the one and only blue beetle. I liked Jaime enough in young justice TV series, but the character was given a raw deal death. In keeping with his characterization, yes, but still.

Whose death? Ted's? In the comics or on Young Justice? In the latter all we know for sure is it took both Deathstroke and Sportsmaster working together to take him down, which is pretty impressive, all things considered.

I agree his comic book death was pretty crappy.


Comic book death. It was interesting, but the raw dealers are superman, wonder woman and the rest of the justice league. His death was noble in its own way, but still...


Which DC Captain Marvel are we talking about.

There's only one I know about...the REAL Captain Marvel...the one and only...Shazam!

If it weren't for foolish trademark laws, everyone would still know him as such.

He predates Marvel (it wasn't known as marvel till DECADES later), and their Captain Marvel by a LOOONG shot.

He was created in 1939/1940.

Of course, he's no stranger to copyright and trademarks...DC didn't originally own Captain Marvel, but had to buy the rights. They originally pursued the creators by calling him a copy of Superman (though to tell the truth, he was outselling superman...which is perhaps why the original suit came about).

Still, if you want to go by who should REALLY be called Captain Marvel by all rights...it should be...Shazam!


GreyWolfLord wrote:

Which DC Captain Marvel are we talking about.

There's only one I know about...the REAL Captain Marvel...the one and only...Shazam!

If it weren't for foolish trademark laws, everyone would still know him as such.

He predates Marvel (it wasn't known as marvel till DECADES later), and their Captain Marvel by a LOOONG shot.

He was created in 1939/1940.

Of course, he's no stranger to copyright and trademarks...DC didn't originally own Captain Marvel, but had to buy the rights. They originally pursued the creators by calling him a copy of Superman (though to tell the truth, he was outselling superman...which is perhaps why the original suit came about).

Still, if you want to go by who should REALLY be called Captain Marvel by all rights...it should be...Shazam!

And then there's Captain Marvel, I mean Marvelman, I mean Miracleman.

And if anyone here hasn't read the Alan Moore Miracleman stories, they're being reprinted after a long time out of print. Get them.


GreyWolfLord wrote:

Which DC Captain Marvel are we talking about.

There's only one I know about...the REAL Captain Marvel...the one and only...Shazam!

If it weren't for foolish trademark laws, everyone would still know him as such.

He predates Marvel (it wasn't known as marvel till DECADES later), and their Captain Marvel by a LOOONG shot.

He was created in 1939/1940.

Of course, he's no stranger to copyright and trademarks...DC didn't originally own Captain Marvel, but had to buy the rights. They originally pursued the creators by calling him a copy of Superman (though to tell the truth, he was outselling superman...which is perhaps why the original suit came about).

Still, if you want to go by who should REALLY be called Captain Marvel by all rights...it should be...Shazam!

I've never really found the character that interesting. I thought he was well-used in Kingdom Come, and in the Giffen/DeMatteis/Maguire Justice League. And I watched the live-action show as a kid, but he doesn't resonate for me. (Unlike, by contrast, the current Captain Marvel at Marvel.)

You obviously dig the character a lot. What is it that you like about him so much? What makes him work for you?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Geez. I'm not the one you addressed, but I'll answer your question. Well with what I think about it.

People say "Shazam," and they have no idea why they say it or where it comes from. Captain Marvel is iconic, just like Batman, Superman, Spider Man, Captain America, the Hulk, Wonder Woman...

The character still has the record for most sales per month (was close to 5 million issues if you added up all the titles he appeared in).

To be honest, Captain Marvel was probably a more popular character than Superman from some time in the 40's to the time the Marvel Family was cease and desisted. It's been a long time but you can google up the legal antics from the 50's. I think knowledgeable people think in retrospect Fawcett could have won a legal battle against DC, but elected not to fight it out.

Now Captain Marvel has a "world" and peeps just like Superman. The wizard Shazam, Uncle Dudley, the Lieutenant Marvels, Tawky Tawny, Captain Marvel Jr (he who Elvis styled his hair after), Mary Marvel, whoever the guy at WHIZ radio was, and a whole lot more. He kind of had some accoutrements like the magic subway train, the Rock of Eternity, the statues of the Seven Deadly Enemies of Man, probably more that didn't stick in my memory.

Captain Marvel's enemies are great, at LEAST as good as Batman's or Flash's, and probably better in total than what Superman had. Doctor Sivana (as Grant Morrison noted he is the template for all other mad scientists), Kull, IBAC, Mister Atom, Black Adam, Mr. Mind, Captain Nazi, give me a while and I'll think of some more.

Now I'd like to state that most of what I am talking about is the original Fawcett run of the Captain, before the publication stoppage.

It's not my theory (though I believe it), but Captain Marvel the original one, just doesn't translate to the modern era. Too much humor, too much goofiness, he had things like Hoppy the Marvel Bunny for pete's sakes.

Attempts to reimagine him in the modern day usually don't really work. If you read the original Fawcett version (DC has or had some hardcover reprints), then read something like Geoff Johns' version of the character you are really put off. Or at least I was.

But the guy is iconic. The gimmick (a kid who becomes a superpowerful champion, the "World's Mightiest Mortal") has been used a few times I know of: Prime, the 2nd incarnation of Mar-Vell in Marvel comics with Rick Jones and the Nega Bands (who says comic book writers don't have a sense of humor?).

Funny thing is that some of the creative guys still get the character. The version in the cartoons Brave and the Bold and Young Justice was well in the spirit of the original character.

In the end, all I can say is read the original stories (40's and early 50's) with an idea for appreciating them with a sensibility not confined to a particular era.

If you do that modern incarnations of the character really just don't seem like The Big Red Cheese, rather just some kind of variant Superman.


sunbeam wrote:
Much detail about the original Captain Marvel.

Thanks for answering and laying out his history. I knew most of the generalities, including the details about CC Beck's work and the tone of the earlier stuff. But thanks for going into deeper detail.

So for you, it's a combination of the specific supporting cast and rogue's gallery, primarily pre-DC, and the nature of the stories (more innocent and humorous?), and the central gimmick? Do I have that right?

Thanks for typing all of that out. If I ever get the opportunity, I'll look at some of the earlier stuff. I'm not much of a fan of the flying, muscly strong guy superhero archetype (outside of Megaton Man, which is a parody). Though I am a big fan of the first two Christopher Reeve Superman movies, and I like Supers in certain stories. (The idea of the Last Son of Krypton probably hooks me more deeply than Kid Becomes Powerful Superhero.) From DC, Flash, Green Arrow, and to a lesser extent Batman are more the ones I can dig, in terms of male superheroes. Generally, I'm more of a Marvel girl, with my comic roots going to Claremont's Uncanny X-Men and New Mutants. So I'm probably looking for different things out of the genre.

Jeff Smith did some work on Captain Marvel a couple years ago. I think that might have the sort of sensibility you prefer for the character. Shazam!: The Monster Society of Evil Four issue mini-series. Might be worth a look if you haven't read it yet.


As sunbeam stated.

One of the problems with Captain Marvel is in yesteryear, comics were consumed by adults and children, and Captain Marvel was directly marketed towards children.

In some ways, when you really explore it, Captain Marvel was much more complex a character than Superman, and maybe even Batman.

Here you have a child, that can become one of the most powerful figures in the universe...which is the dream of many children. However, when you really look at him, he is still a child with all the child's fallibilities.

What's more, is when he became a child, he was more vulnerable in ways than Clark Kent, Bruce Wayne, or any adult, as only a child could be.

Which is something kids can relate to, but sometimes we forget that as adults.

AS comics seem to be more marketed towards adults these days then kids (how many kids do you see at the comics shops these days vs. adults?). The locations where kids would get comics (convenience stores, grocery store magazine racks, etc) largely do not carry them anymore.

And perhaps that's the problem with Captain Marvel to a degree in this modern day, it's more a character that is a child's dream, and one that many adults don't relate to.

However, when you get to the core character, I think there can be a LOT more complexity within Captain Marvel then many other characters.

Many of his foes are not the typical foes a Superman would engage in, but ones which directly attack his weaknesses (his mental and emotional states, the physical state when he's not an adult, etc) and originally (early on, before the modern age) some of his comics could be seen as being written deeper then his contemporary comicbooks.


If you'd like a really good take on the character of Captain Marvel/Shazam, watch the episodes of Justice League/Justice League Unlimited that he appeared in. His childlike idealism and his enthusiastic attempts to do the right thing - rather than the necessarily "mature" thing - are part of what really defined his character before his modern revamp. He really takes the League to task on what it means to be a hero and why he wanted to be one in the first place. (hint: It was to make a difference, as I mentioned hoping to see a return to with Convergence, up-thread)


Yeah, I read that redo of the Monster Society. The biggest problem I had with it was that it was pretty definitely in the camp that Captain Marvel was a different person, or at least personality than Billy Batson.

That seems like hair splitting, but that question has been around as long as the character. Sometimes it is like Billy Batson is in an adult's body, other times it is more like they are two different people.

Curiously there was never any argument about Mary Batson and Freddy Freeman. Both were pretty clearly the same person in new bodies.

For me to really like a comic it does absolutely have to have a supporting cast. I really think of the enemies as part of the cast honestly. You kind of have to have a world around the character.

To me the classic Superman is the 1960's version. You had kryptonite, Krypto, Kara Zor-El (Linda Lee), Lex Luthor, Brainiac, Batman at times, the Justice League, Lois Lane, Perry White, the Daily Planet, Lori Lemaris, the Legion of Super Heroes, the bottle city of Kandor, Lana Lang still around some, Jimmy Olsen... god Jimmy Olsen is his own book. A shame you can't have a character like that in the modern era.

Maybe kind of camp and juvenile but it was such a rich world, and it has been mined and homaged a lot. I've always thought the biggest problem with Wonder Woman is that she never really had that. And she's been retconned and rebooted so many times it is hard to say what is associated with her world.

But yeah, Captain Marvel, at least the version I like is a very lighthearted kind of thing. He doesn't belong with the likes of the Killing Joke, Arkham Asylum, or any of this mega serious totally dark stuff.

Basically if any hero uses the word "Blood" or "War" in his name Captain Marvel doesn't belong there.


And just for the heck of it, here is a link to the cover of the last issue of the Marvel Family, the last appearance of the characters till DC did one of a number of reboots in the early 70's:

http://dc.wikia.com/wiki/Marvel_Family_Vol_1_89

I like the way the writers and artists chose to go out. Kind of a ghost in the machine kind of thing.


jemstone wrote:
If you'd like a really good take on the character of Captain Marvel/Shazam, watch the episodes of Justice League/Justice League Unlimited that he appeared in. His childlike idealism and his enthusiastic attempts to do the right thing - rather than the necessarily "mature" thing - are part of what really defined his character before his modern revamp. He really takes the League to task on what it means to be a hero and why he wanted to be one in the first place. (hint: It was to make a difference, as I mentioned hoping to see a return to with Convergence, up-thread)

liked him in justice League, public enemies and in young justice most of all. Didn't care for other incarnations in the slightest.

Scarab Sages

Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
Kalshane wrote:
Man, I loved the original Blue Beetle run with Jaime (never bothered with the New52 one. Haven't touched single DC book since the reboot.)

I gave the reboot a year. I bought about three quarter of the comics. Within 6 months, 6 had been cancelled and replaced with nothing spectacular. After a year, I had dropped everything except Action, Superman, Supergirl, and Legion of Super-Heroes & Legion Lost (both of which have been cancelled).

I miss the real DC Universe.


Freehold DM wrote:
liked him in justice League, public enemies and in young justice most of all. Didn't care for other incarnations in the slightest.

Captain Marvel on Young Justice was excellent. I also enjoyed his appearance on JLU.

This may be the first time I've seen anyone say anything positive about Public Enemies.

On a more general note, I think DC can do some interesting, mature stuff with Captain Marvel when they acknowledge the reality of this being a child in a super-powered body and what that entails, though it doesn't necessarily have to be dark. (And I agree DC has gotten way too committed to "dark and gritty" lately. One of the things I like about The Flash show is that they're not ashamed to allow a super-hero story to be fun, even if the show has some darker elements, particularly with Wells.) I've also seen some excellent (pre-New52, of course) interactions between Captain Marvel and Superman that explore the differences between them, and actually humanize Superman quite a bit.

Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Entertainment / Comics / Renee Montoya Returns. And Oracle. And Wally West. And... All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Comics