
Darthslash |
I'm floored at how vague this description is, it had our group arguing almost angrily last night.
Situation
Base Acrobatics DC*
Move through a threatened area Opponent's Combat Maneuver Defense
Move through an enemy's space 5 + opponent's Combat Maneuver Defense
* This DC is used to avoid an attack of opportunity due to movement. This DC increases by 2 for each additional opponent avoided in 1 round.
According to the wording of this action, you can only move 'Through' an enemies threatened square and avoid the AOO with acrobatics.
You can't move away from an enemy and avoid the AOO with acrobatics! And this floored me. Why allow you to move 'Through' an enemy's threatened square but not out of a threatened square with acrobatics?
OOOOOOOOOO
OOOOO23OOO
OOOOOAOOOO
OOOO1OOOOO
OOOBOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOO
O=Empty Square
1,2,3=Player 1, 2 and 3
A=Enemies starting square
B=Enemies ending square after using acrobatics.
So according to the rules, the enemy rolls his acrobatics check against player's 1 CMD, but players 2 and 3 get AOO's Vs. the enemy.
Please tell me, is this how it really works??? According to the wording it is.

Darth Grall |

You seem rather upset. From one Darth to another, chill.
Secondly, you are meant to move out of those squares. There are FAQs on the matter. And those FAQs mention "leaving squares threatened by enemies", so the RAI is very clear on the matter.

Faelyn |

Pretend?!? Did you just say Pretend??? Ooookay, I'll just pretend my weapon says it does 10d10 damage instead of 1d8 too.
Matter of fact, I can make the game way easier for me if I pretend the rules say different things.
That's a great way to keep people from trying to help you with your question.
In reference to your question... Rule #1 to Pathfinder... is the common sense rule. The implication is that one can use Acrobatics to avoid AoO's with movement. Even though the skill doesn't specifically say "into" or "out" of a threatened area... through is a generalized term to encompass the idea.
Reference these rules for additional. It doesn't specify moving into, out of, or through threatened areas.

Xaratherus |

First, let's take a look at what exactly it is that provokes:
Moving out of a threatened square usually provokes attacks of opportunity from threatening opponents. There are two common methods of avoiding such an attack—the 5-foot step and the withdraw action.
So it's the act of leaving a square, not entering it, that provokes.
Now, to look at the wording of Acrobatics, it states that you move through a square without provoking. "Moving through" could consist potentially of three parts: Entering the square, being in the square, and then leaving the square.
Entering the square doesn't provoke; being in the square doesn't provoke (simply from being in it); exiting the square does.
Thus, in the case of Acrobatics, you're avoiding provocation from leaving a square. And you can do that without moving into it.