![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![Michael Sayre Private Avatar](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/private/Private-MichaelSayre.jpg)
Spellslinger 1/Sorc 19
Spellslinger 1/Witch 19
Spellslinger 1/Magus 19.....
All the bonus and flavor. None of the restrictions
.....
Profit
Yeah, Spellslinger was one of those archetypes that wasn't very well thought through since you can grab the entire utility of the archetype with a one level dip. And since it doesn't specify arcane spells (other than in the name of the ability) you can technically pair this one level dip with any casting class, even druids and clerics.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![Michael Sayre Private Avatar](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/private/Private-MichaelSayre.jpg)
That wouldn't fly in my table. I'd actually make a FIAT ruling that only wizard spells can be focused through the arcane gun, as that is the clear RAI.
I absolutely agree with you Lazar, as I had to do the same thing just recently with a player who was trying to pair it up with cleric levels.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Brambleman |
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Nemitri |
![Camper](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PathfinderCover5.jpg)
LazarX wrote:That wouldn't fly in my table. I'd actually make a FIAT ruling that only wizard spells can be focused through the arcane gun, as that is the clear RAI.I absolutely agree with you Lazar, as I had to do the same thing just recently with a player who was trying to pair it up with cleric levels.
You want to nerf something that is already sub-par at best?
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
Ssalarn wrote:You want to nerf something that is already sub-par at best?LazarX wrote:That wouldn't fly in my table. I'd actually make a FIAT ruling that only wizard spells can be focused through the arcane gun, as that is the clear RAI.I absolutely agree with you Lazar, as I had to do the same thing just recently with a player who was trying to pair it up with cleric levels.
For a Blasting Wizard style, which is what the Spellslinger is intended for, it's hardly sub par.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Dragonamedrake |
![Silver Dragon](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/SilverDragon7.jpg)
Well your welcome to houserule it all you want (personally I think its fine... Dipping is common in melee.... why is this different). It still works that way
I think most of the responses here are knee-jerk reactions. The Archetype isnt that great to begin with and a gun toating witch is just cool... I always picture him like the cover art from the Dark Tower series. He even has a crow (Familiar).
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
mbauers |
![Belkar Bitterleaf](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/Avatar_Belkar.jpg)
I like the spellslinger as an in route to a theurge build. Thinking of yourself as a striker rather than primary caster makes the class a lot easier to digest.
Yep, I want to make a Cleric with Rune Domain (gets scribe scroll), Spellslinger/Cypher Mage, Mystic Theurge.
Low BAB, but I'm wondering if it would matter with touch attacks and high weapon enhancement with the arcane gun.