Applying Metamagic Feats to Magic Missle


Rules Questions

Shadow Lodge

Hi all! I think I know the answer to this, but it's a slow Saturday so I thought I'd ask the masses for confirmation.

When applying a metamagic feat to a spell like Magic Missile (which can have multiple targets) I think the metamagic is only applied once.

For example I have PFS character who has the Toppling Spell Metamagic feat. I can, I think, only trip one opponent, even if I have 5 missiles at my disposal.

I make this assumption based on other things working the same way (like Evocation Specialized wizards only adding their damage to one missile not to all missiles).

So, am I right or am I overly limiting myself? And I'm looking for a RAW response as this is for PFS. In a home game of course you can work it out with the GM. Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

The Exchange

As far as I am aware, Metamagic affects all facets of the spell equally. Toppling spell would be able to trip multiple opponents, or you can have 5 attempts versus one, or any combination. Each missile gets the toppling effect.


RAW, it looks to me like Toppling Spell's effect is per target, not per spell or per missile. So, if you hit five different targets, then you'll make five trip checks; or if you hit one target with five missiles, then you'll make one trip check. If I understand correctly.

The Exchange

Oh yeah. Derp. I need to read the effect before I go spouting off. You're right, Fredrik.


Could be worse. Earlier today, I had to eat crow for thinking that it was a general rule that you didn't have to meet the prereqs for a bonus feat. (I mostly play rangers.) We all have our derps. ;)

Silver Crusade

I agree with Fredrik on this one, just based on the wording of Toppling Spell.

Shadow Lodge

OK then. Apparently I've been doing it wrong. :)

To follow up, what do you think about this one then? Same thing?

Dazing Spell

I have a concept going...


Even I have my 'derp' moments. I utterly hate them.

And I agree with what has been said about the RAW of Toppling Spell. However, I feel that it is against intent. Perhaps some day a developer will comment on the RAI of it.

- Gauss


Euan wrote:

OK then. Apparently I've been doing it wrong. :)

To follow up, what do you think about this one then? Same thing?

Dazing Spell

I have a concept going... :)

Same thing. Except with a level increase of +3, and they get a Will save to negate the effect. I'm just theorycrafting here -- I haven't used it or anything -- but it doesn't look to me like it would be worth it.. unless..

If you're trying to incapacitate a bunch of minions, and you have something like the Magical Lineage trait to keep the level down, then maybe. But I'd give it a really skeptical scrutiny before committing.

Silver Crusade

I'm agreeing with Fredrik again, both in thinking that Dazing Spell seems to affect everyone it damages, and also in thinking it's usually not going to be worth the 3 level cost.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Applying Metamagic Feats to Magic Missle All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.