RSS Facebook Twitter Email
Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society

PFS module play and GM rating

Pathfinder Society

Search Thread

Search this Thread:

Grand Lodge 1/5

Does running a PFS module such as The Godsmouth Heresey rate as running only one scenario towards a GMs star rating.
Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/55/5 **
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber
Andrew Daley wrote:
Does running a PFS module such as The Godsmouth Heresey rate as running only one scenario towards a GMs star rating.

Counts as 2

5/5

Special Modules such as master of the Fallen Fortress and We Be Goblins are an exception, as they only count as one scenario towards GM rating.
Lantern Lodge 4/5

I ran "We Be Goblins!" last October, and there's "GM ranking: +2" noted in the online reporting page, which would indicate counting as two toward GM rating, as per other Sanctioned Modules.
5/5
Stephen White wrote:
I ran "We Be Goblins!" last October, and there's "GM ranking: +2" noted in the online reporting page, which would indicate counting as two toward GM rating, as per other Sanctioned Modules.

Someone mentioned that would be corrected by IT. Maybe it never got beyond discussion.

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/55/5 **
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber
Diego Winterborg wrote:
Someone mentioned that would be corrected by IT. Maybe it never got beyond discussion.

When I asked, Mike said he was not going to correct it and it did not worry him.

Scarab Sages 1/5

Many thanks.
Grand Lodge 4/5

There is too much programming involved to separate those two modules from the rest for purposes of GM star rating. There are better things on my request list for IT to take care of.

If someone wants to game the system, then they will. I am trying to rely on the integrity of the GMs. Hopefully that trust isn't violated.
Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/5 RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 8
Michael Brock wrote:
If someone wants to game the system, then they will. I am trying to rely on the integrity of the GMs. Hopefully that trust isn't violated.

I hope people don't assume I'm gaming the system when I run a WE BE GOBLINS game day for April Fools at my local store.

Grand Lodge 4/5
WalterGM wrote:
Michael Brock wrote:
If someone wants to game the system, then they will. I am trying to rely on the integrity of the GMs. Hopefully that trust isn't violated.
I hope people don't assume I'm gaming the system when I run a WE BE GOBLINS game day for April Fools at my local store.

Not at all.

5/5
Dragnmoon wrote:
Diego Winterborg wrote:
Someone mentioned that would be corrected by IT. Maybe it never got beyond discussion.
When I asked, Mike said he was not going to correct it and it did not worry him.

I stand corrected.

1/5
2 people marked this as a favorite.
WalterGM wrote:
Michael Brock wrote:
If someone wants to game the system, then they will. I am trying to rely on the integrity of the GMs. Hopefully that trust isn't violated.
I hope people don't assume I'm gaming the system when I run a WE BE GOBLINS game day for April Fools at my local store.

I plan to fully exploit this loophole and gain my 4-star status in 50 short years running the free scenario every year!! MUHUHAHAHAHA!!!

Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / PFS module play and GM rating All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Pathfinder Society
What's the point of PFS ?
Last post: by Sir Belmont the Valiant, II